Preview
ELECTRONICALLYV'CEIVED - 10/12/2023 1:09 PM - ByLDria Portillo, DEPUTY
F I LE D
AWN
SUPERIOR couaT 0F CAUFORNIA
COUNTY 0F SAN Beaumomo
SAN Benumomo ctsmlcr
NOV 0 7 2023
J LES.
OOOQONM
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
‘\
LUZ GOMEZ and PHILIP HUGHES, Case No. CIVSBZZO7056
11 individually, and on behalf of all others
Assigned to Hon. David Cohn
similarly situated,
12
l
ORDER GRANTING
|
13
Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR FINAL
PLAINTIFFS’
APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
V.
14
Date: November 7, 2023
15 4400WE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. d/b/a Time: 9:00 a.m.
PATTERN JOBS; RADIAL, INC.; and METRO Dept; 826
16 AIR SERVICE, INC.
17
Defendants.
Date Action Filed: April 7, 2022
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
i
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
Gomez v. 4400 WE Technologies, lnc., Case No. CIVSBZ207056
QRDER OF FINAL APPROVAL AND JUDGMENT
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD:
AWN The Motion of Plaintiffs’ Luz Gomez and Philip Hughes for Final Approval of Class Action
Settlement (“Motion”) came on regularly for hearing before this Court on November 7, 2023, at 9:00
a.m. Consistent with this Court’s Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,
entered on July 21, 2023, the Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”), attached as Exhibit l to the
Declaration of Carolyn Hunt Cottrell in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval, and
due and adequate notice having been given to all Class Members as required in the Preliminary
Approval Order, and the Coun having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and
10 otherwise being fully informed and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED,
ll ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:
12 l. All terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Settlement.
13 2. The Settlement Class is certified for settlement purposes only as to the following
l4 Settlement Class: All individuals engaged by Pattern as independent contractors or non-exempt
15 employees in the State 0f California, including those who performed services for Radial, Metro, or
l6 those assigned to work at a facility operated by Radial or Metro, or at any other facility in California,
l7 from December 9, 2017, through July 21, 2023 (“Class Period”). The Aggrieved Employees are all
18 individuals engaged by Pattern as independent contractors or non-exempt employees in the State 0f
l9 California, including those who performed services for Radial, Metro, or those assigned to work at a
20 facility operated by Radial or Metro, or at any other facility in California, from October 5, 2020,
2| through July 2 l, 2023 (“PAGA Period”).
22 3. The “Released Parties” are Defendants and their past or present officers, directors,
23 shareholders, employees, agents, principals, heirs, representatives, accountants, auditors, attorneys,
24 consultants, insurers, and their respective successors and predecessors in interest, assigns, subsidiaries,
25 affiliates, parents, and the third-party facilities in California where Settlement Class Members and
26 Allegedly Aggrieved Individuals worked shifls through Pattcm’s technology platform and their past
27 and present parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, assigns, and their present and
28 former officers, agents, shareholders, fiduciaries, plan administrators, employees, attorneys, insurers,
I
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
Gomez v. 4400 WE Technologies, Ina, Case No. CIVSBZ207056
Preview
ELECTRONICALLYV'CEIVED - 10/12/2023 1:09 PM - ByLDria Portillo, DEPUTY F I LE D AWN SUPERIOR couaT 0F CAUFORNIA COUNTY 0F SAN Beaumomo SAN Benumomo ctsmlcr NOV 0 7 2023 J LES. OOOQONM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ‘\ LUZ GOMEZ and PHILIP HUGHES, Case No. CIVSBZZO7056 11 individually, and on behalf of all others Assigned to Hon. David Cohn similarly situated, 12 l ORDER GRANTING | 13 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR FINAL PLAINTIFFS’ APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT V. 14 Date: November 7, 2023 15 4400WE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. d/b/a Time: 9:00 a.m. PATTERN JOBS; RADIAL, INC.; and METRO Dept; 826 16 AIR SERVICE, INC. 17 Defendants. Date Action Filed: April 7, 2022 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT Gomez v. 4400 WE Technologies, lnc., Case No. CIVSBZ207056 QRDER OF FINAL APPROVAL AND JUDGMENT TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD: AWN The Motion of Plaintiffs’ Luz Gomez and Philip Hughes for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (“Motion”) came on regularly for hearing before this Court on November 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Consistent with this Court’s Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, entered on July 21, 2023, the Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”), attached as Exhibit l to the Declaration of Carolyn Hunt Cottrell in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval, and due and adequate notice having been given to all Class Members as required in the Preliminary Approval Order, and the Coun having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and 10 otherwise being fully informed and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ll ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 12 l. All terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Settlement. 13 2. The Settlement Class is certified for settlement purposes only as to the following l4 Settlement Class: All individuals engaged by Pattern as independent contractors or non-exempt 15 employees in the State 0f California, including those who performed services for Radial, Metro, or l6 those assigned to work at a facility operated by Radial or Metro, or at any other facility in California, l7 from December 9, 2017, through July 21, 2023 (“Class Period”). The Aggrieved Employees are all 18 individuals engaged by Pattern as independent contractors or non-exempt employees in the State 0f l9 California, including those who performed services for Radial, Metro, or those assigned to work at a 20 facility operated by Radial or Metro, or at any other facility in California, from October 5, 2020, 2| through July 2 l, 2023 (“PAGA Period”). 22 3. The “Released Parties” are Defendants and their past or present officers, directors, 23 shareholders, employees, agents, principals, heirs, representatives, accountants, auditors, attorneys, 24 consultants, insurers, and their respective successors and predecessors in interest, assigns, subsidiaries, 25 affiliates, parents, and the third-party facilities in California where Settlement Class Members and 26 Allegedly Aggrieved Individuals worked shifls through Pattcm’s technology platform and their past 27 and present parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, assigns, and their present and 28 former officers, agents, shareholders, fiduciaries, plan administrators, employees, attorneys, insurers, I [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT Gomez v. 4400 WE Technologies, Ina, Case No. CIVSBZ207056