arrow left
arrow right
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
						
                                

Preview

UWY-CV-5028TK :SUPERIOR COURT NANCY BURTON :JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY V. :COMPLEX LITIGATION DAVID PHILIP MASON :OCTOBER 31, 2023 Y’S PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CARMOD MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT sition to Defendant Carmody’s Plaintiff Nancy Burton herewith files her oppo First Count (Defamation) of the Motion for Summary Judgment wit h regard to the Book §17-44 et seq. Substitute Fifth Amended Complaint. Practice follows: The First Count alleges in Paragraph 45 as ly and publicly circulated and Defendant Carmody and Ms. Winters have wide g plaintiff, accusing her falsely published false and defamatory sc reeds targetin inter alia of ‘using the law to brea’ k the law’; although plaintiff timely demanded ns, neither Carmody nor Winters retraction of the false and offensive publicatio complieParagraph 46¢ alleges: of the cease and desist order, said Prior to the Zoning Commission’s issuance harassing plaintiff and interfering Mason, Carmody, Gibbons and others took to rehome most of her goats in the with her ability to carry out her objective to ing publication of defamatory following ways, among others . ..e. Instigat published on online media channels falsehoods about plaintiff and the goats as ty and malice and discourage goat operated by Susan Winters to incite negativi adoptions. reference herein her Affidavit Plaintiff attaches hereto and incorporates by m of La’ w in Opposition to Motion with Exhibit List and Exhibits and Memorandu e is no genuine issue of for Summary J udgment. Based on the foregoing, ther ment as a matter requires a trial and Plaintiff is entitled to udg j material fact that of law. NANCY BURTON THE PLAINTIFF — 147 Cross Highway Redding CT 06896 Tel. 203-928-3952 NancyBurtonCT@aol.com CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion for Summary Judgment was or will be immediately be delivered electronically on or before October 31, 2023 to the following, being counsel of record to all parties of record: Philip T. Newbury, Jr. Howd & Ludorf, LLC 100 Great Meadow Road, Suite 201 Wethersfield CT 06109 pnewbury@hl-law.com Kimberly Bosse, Esq. James N. Tallberg, Esq. Karsten & Tallberg, LLC 500 Enterprise Drive, Suite 4 Rocky Hill CT 06067 kbosse@ktlawfirm.com jtallberg@kt-lawfirm.com Steven J. Stafstrom, Jr., Esq. Pullman & Comley, LLC 850 Main Street, P.O. Box 7006 Bridgeport CT 06601 stafstrom@pullcom.com AA