Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023
Supreme Court of The State Of New York
Justice Kathy King
60 Centre Street
New York, NY 10007
To the court,
ADA Christina Ante originally contacted the court for a postponement on September 5th, 2023. It
turns out that I have a doctors appointment on that date that would delay a long time if I had to
postpone that appointment with a primary care doctor. I cannot come to court on September 5th
and will reject any attempt to hold this court date without me.
Also, please take note that I have filed a complaint with the US Attorney, Criminal Division. The
motion itself is illegal and will be used as the accusatory intrament in a criminal matter filed with
the US Attorneys Office. This court has repeatedly failed to acknowledge real facts and real
crimes against me while making predetermined decisions.
The New York County District Attorney’s Office, regardless with the actual District Attorney,
exists a criminal pattern of a slew of cases against me based from the first one in 1995m when I
was illegally arrested for unlawful eviction, covered by Genovese-Gambino members related to
persons from my hometown influencing NYPD and the District Attorney’s Office. They can not
do this again in your court, therefore Motion 11 Decision-Order is moot.
Related to the corruption within the New York County District Attorney’s Office intentional
failure to acknowledge the corruption and crimes against me by helping to engineer housing
cases having NYPD and their investigative unit troll me to wherever I work to block income, to
construct a a slew of housing cases and easily influence lower court judges to engage and
contacting state Judges with frivolous falsehoods about me, resulting in a steered, engineered
Order and Decisions from the lower Court. They cannot do this again in your court, or even
Federal Court, therefore Motion 11 Decision-Order is moot.
The fact of the matter is that there is a Judgement by Confess in State Supreme Court in Kings
County. It is based on the landlord at 192 Crescent Avenue in the Bronx, overcharging me rent
while also constructed a housing case to evict me while the mafia through Anna and Paul
xxxxxx thwarted and blocked income by pitting me against other people.
The Judgement by Confess is also related to the harassment and crimes of this landlord
crosswire my landline phone helping Anna and Paul xxxxxx, while they engaged the same
mafia, in a premeditated way to cause severe bodily injuries to my head by telling falsehoods to
an exboyfreind, Matthew Levy and a convicted felon, Peter Lapadora, that I was talking to the
FBI about actual drug deals going down involving the mafia, then projecting that it is me that has
the “relationship” with this person to evade supreme criminal felony assault charges, and while
concurrently getting help from Peter Lapadoras family members, Peter Benza, a Union NJ
1 of 6
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023
Prosecutor. And therefore, any and all housing cases against me are illegal, specifically the
content of certain Decisions and Orders, from 52 Hamilton Place v. xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx, and most
importantly, 237 West 105th Street LLC v. xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx
Simply put, the document itself for the Decision Order of Motion 11 is an illegal document,
designed for predetermination, and is the accusatory instament against 119 South Street and the
attorney that reps them, and this defendants co-defendants by confess, New York County District
Attorney, Dr. Allan Matarasso, Steven T Greenberg c/o Greenberg Cosmetic Surgery and
Dermatology, and Lenox Hill Hospital.
Lastly, even in Judge Ronnie Abrams court in US District Court, I was not made knowledgeable
of the connection of Charlie Sahadi projecting lies for Anna xxxxxx and Paul xxxxxx, through
the mafia, until the case was dismissed. Charle Sahadi, harassed me about having a boyfriend
that is a gangster, while I was being trolled by one in Sept 2020, when the facts are that gangsters
are affiliated with Anna Pilato Aramans family, and crooked cops that my younger brother Paul
Armaan is associated with.
There is no way I will accept this organized crime decision-order coming from the platform of
the legal government in State Court. The decisions rendered here through Judges are to be
considered highly illegal and the most unethical.
Please postpone the court date to at least the week of September 10, 2023. I also need more time
to make a motion or order to show cause. It would behoove the DAs office to think about this,
since the Genovese family power is associated with Rudy Guiliani and other attorneys Arthur
Nalbandian, attempting to coerce me to let “Guliani, a close friends of Trump, to help me”. I
have nothing to do with Trump in any way. Giuliani claims to knock down mafia is, that he
knocked down other mafia families for Genovese so that they are in power. He is a criminal and
a hypocrite. Guiliani helped Genovese and Gambino profile me as an escort as retaliation for
their paranoia of narcotics, and use by brother with mental health problems to cover up for their
family members, Anna Pilato xxxxxx.
Dated: August 31, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx, Plaintiff pro se
Cc: Judge Ronnie Abrams, and US Attorney Criminal Division.
2 of 6
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023
United States Attorney's OEce
. Soutkern.District of New York
Civilian Complaint T1nit
Criminal Division
CMIian Complaint Form
investigative agencies
The U.S. Attoniey's OEce represents thé Government in legal proceedings and works closely with
States Attomey's OEoe is charged with enforcing the federal oriminal
th,e FBL The Criminaf Division of the United
acluding
District which includes the Bronx, Dutchess, New York, Orange, Patnam, Rockland,
aws within the Southern of New York,
Mlivan and Westchester counties.
plaint. Perseia/Entity Being Com laimed About:
P rson g This Co
Name Name
A Address
Phone Coimty Phone
County
we receive from concerned members of the public prevents us frosa responding
Although the volume of information
to every be assured we wBI carefuHy.eensider
that ‰ie informatten ydu have provid d us to
adividually complaint,
Jetermine whether there is a matter for this U@ce to invesegate. If we determine that tour· complaintraises a matter
and that further information Trom you is necessary for sur investigation,
within the jurisdletion of this Office to investigate
rou wiH be contacted. This Office does not resolveindividusI censumer complaints.
VÃTURE OF ALLEGED ChlMINAL VIOLATION(B):
Tax Frand Terrorf¾m/National Seenrity . __.Internet Fraud
___Healthcare/Medicare Fraud
- ___Drugs
__Publis Corrupffon/Frand/Waste Organized Crime . . __Corporate.Fraud
(for ser or forced . -
__Computer Environmental Crime Human Trafficking laber)
Crhaes/Reeking
__Child Pornography/Exploitation MortgagdBank/Credit Card/ATM Fraud 4s Mentity Theft
Other (pIease explain) V\ Ùbi
. Seearities Frand
Does this Complaint P.ertain to an Ongoing Case? Yes __ N N T
If Yes, Please Provide the FoHowing Case Info afian:
Docket Number (if known): C . .
Case Title and V
Please describe the violation of federal criminal laws that you would like to bring to our attention. IWelude as
clearly
the places and nature ofincident, and conta-ctinformation for any witnesses
ach information as.possible, including dates,
send o¦d documen
3 of 6
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023
Are You e of Êy er VI (s
1 tiÁ of this ge Crim ?
Are on
Yes No Not 8ure
No Not Sure
Yes
Please stŒther Victim(s):
If Yes,
in this Matter? ___Yes No
Are You Represented by an Attorney
Please Provide Attorney Contact Info:
If Yes,
Phone:
Name:
Address:
this Matter? Yes _No
Have You Filed a Lawsuit Concerning
Please·Provide the Followin Case Information: . ..
If Yes,
Number: 7
Case Title and Doeket
Name and Address of Court: C
Status of Court Case (pending, dismissed, settled): 4M4 . .
abo,ut.this Matter with this flice Any Other Federal, State or Local
Havelau Previons]y Filed a Complaint
_No If Yes, Date Filed: t fd- 7 3 C)
_ . Ageney(s)? Yes
Contae.t Person: AMyr . .Agency: N Y 45>a c r,e.J
S.tatus of Previous Complaint:
under the laws of the United States of America that an of
or state) under penalty of perfmy
I declare (or certify, verify,
* to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
inf ®o true, correct and complete
the foregoing
Signature:
F eented on this Date: 2 3
REGARDING THE PRESERVATION OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS:
EdPORTANT NOTE
statute of limitation that might apply to any claim you
a complaint to this OfHee has no effect on any
Jubmitting
Office you have not commenced a lawsuit or other legal proceeding,
have. a complaint to this
nay By submitting believe
or lawsuit the subject of your complaint. If you
ad this Office has not initiated an investigation regarding
seek to sue for or other relief, you should contact a private
your rights have been violated and you money
hat
. .
ittorney.
complaint form to: United States Attorney's Office
dail this completed
Southern District of New York . .
Civilian Complaint Unit (Criminal Division)
Attn:
.
One St. Andrew's Plaza
- New York, NY 10007
a a
a
4 of 6
FILED: NEW INDEX NO.
NO. 8OO003
800003/2022
|FILED : NEW YORK
YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK 07
CLERK 08/31/2023
/21/2 023 05:35
12 : 55 PM
PlÈ
INDEX 2022
NYSCEF
NYSCEF DOC.
DOC. NO.
NO. 166
154 RECEIVED NYSCEF:
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2O23
08/31/2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT: HON. KATHY J. KING PART 06
Justice
---------------------------____________Ç INDEX NO. 800003/2022
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx
MOTION DATE 05/02/2023
Plaintiff,
MOTION SEQ. NO. 011
- y -
STEPHEN T. GREENBERG, ALAN MATARASSO, LENOX
HILL HOSPITAL, 119 SOUTH STREET MANAGEMENT
LLC C/O LUCIA BARLETTA, PINO MANICA, FRANCESCO DECISION + ORDER ON
MANICA, CHRISTINA MANICA, NEW YORK COUNTY MOTION
DISTRICT ATTORNEY,
Defendant.
___________________________..______________Ç
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 011) 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40,
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49,,50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68,
69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 92, 102, 104, 105, 106,
107, 108, 109, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152
were read on this motion to/for RENEW/REARGUE/RESETTLE/RECONSIDER .
Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiff, xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx, moves to renew, reargue and
revoke the Court's decision/order dated March 26, 2023. Defendants Stephen T. Greenberg, MD
s/h/a Stephen T Greenberg c/o Greenberg Cosmetic Surgery and Dermatology, 119 South Street
Management, LLC c/o Lucia Barletta, Pino Manica, Francesco Manica and Christina Manica, Dr.
Alan Matarasso, and the New York County District Attorney oppose the motion.
CPLR § 2221(d)(2) provides that a motion for leave to reargue "shall be based upon matters
of fact or law allegedly overlooked or misapprehended by the court in determining the prior
motion"
motion, but shall not include any matters of fact not offered on the prior (see James v
Nestor, 120 AD2d 442, 443 [1st Dept 1986]).
The Court agrees with defendants, in opposition, and finds that plaintiff failed to meet her
burden for leave to reargue as set forth in the CPLR, since her moving papers consist solely of
800003/2022 xxxxxx, xxxxxxxxx vs. GREENBERG, STEPHEN T. Page 1 of 2
Motion No. 011
1 of 2
5 of 6
FILED: NEW INDEX NO.
NO. 800003/2022
800003/2022
(FILED: NEW YORK
YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK 07
CLERK 08/31/2023
/21/2023 05:35
12 : 55 PM
P$
INDEX
NYSCEF
NYSCEF DOC.
DOC. NO.
NO. 166
154 RECEIVED NYSCEF:
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2023
08/31/2023
self-serving characterizations of the Court's reasoning for denial of the March 26, 2023 motions,
and does not identify any law that the Court misapplied or any facts that the Court overlooked or
misapprehended. The Court notes that "reargument is not designed to afford the unsuccessful
party successive opportunities to reargue issues previously decided ... or to present arguments
asserted"
different from those originally ( Matter of Setters v AI Props. & Devs. (USA) Corp., 139
AD3d 492, 492 [1st Dept 2016], quoting William P. Pahl Equip. Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27
[1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks omitted] ; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-68
[1st Dept 1979]).
CPLR §2221(e) provides that an application for leave to renew must be based upon
additional material facts which existed at the time the prior motion was made, but were not then
known to the party seeking leave to renew, and therefore, not made known to the court. Here,
plaintiff presents the same facts and identical arguments that she made in support of her motions
defendants'
(Motion Seq. Nos. 6, 7 and 9) and in opposition to motions (Motion Seq. Nos. 1, 2, 3
5, and 8). Said facts and arguments were considered in the Court's decision/order dated March
26, 2023, thus, renewal is not warranted.
Based on the foregoing, plaintiff's motion is denied in its entirety.
This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.
7/20/2023
DATE KATH . .K G,J.S.C.
CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE
800003/2022 xxxxxx, xxxxxxxxx vs. GREENBERG, STEPHEN T. Page 2 of 2
Motion No. 011
2 of 2
6 of 6
Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023 Supreme Court of The State Of New York Justice Kathy King 60 Centre Street New York, NY 10007 To the court, ADA Christina Ante originally contacted the court for a postponement on September 5th, 2023. It turns out that I have a doctors appointment on that date that would delay a long time if I had to postpone that appointment with a primary care doctor. I cannot come to court on September 5th and will reject any attempt to hold this court date without me. Also, please take note that I have filed a complaint with the US Attorney, Criminal Division. The motion itself is illegal and will be used as the accusatory intrament in a criminal matter filed with the US Attorneys Office. This court has repeatedly failed to acknowledge real facts and real crimes against me while making predetermined decisions. The New York County District Attorney’s Office, regardless with the actual District Attorney, exists a criminal pattern of a slew of cases against me based from the first one in 1995m when I was illegally arrested for unlawful eviction, covered by Genovese-Gambino members related to persons from my hometown influencing NYPD and the District Attorney’s Office. They can not do this again in your court, therefore Motion 11 Decision-Order is moot. Related to the corruption within the New York County District Attorney’s Office intentional failure to acknowledge the corruption and crimes against me by helping to engineer housing cases having NYPD and their investigative unit troll me to wherever I work to block income, to construct a a slew of housing cases and easily influence lower court judges to engage and contacting state Judges with frivolous falsehoods about me, resulting in a steered, engineered Order and Decisions from the lower Court. They cannot do this again in your court, or even Federal Court, therefore Motion 11 Decision-Order is moot. The fact of the matter is that there is a Judgement by Confess in State Supreme Court in Kings County. It is based on the landlord at 192 Crescent Avenue in the Bronx, overcharging me rent while also constructed a housing case to evict me while the mafia through Anna and Paul xxxxxx thwarted and blocked income by pitting me against other people. The Judgement by Confess is also related to the harassment and crimes of this landlord crosswire my landline phone helping Anna and Paul xxxxxx, while they engaged the same mafia, in a premeditated way to cause severe bodily injuries to my head by telling falsehoods to an exboyfreind, Matthew Levy and a convicted felon, Peter Lapadora, that I was talking to the FBI about actual drug deals going down involving the mafia, then projecting that it is me that has the “relationship” with this person to evade supreme criminal felony assault charges, and while concurrently getting help from Peter Lapadoras family members, Peter Benza, a Union NJ 1 of 6 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023 Prosecutor. And therefore, any and all housing cases against me are illegal, specifically the content of certain Decisions and Orders, from 52 Hamilton Place v. xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx, and most importantly, 237 West 105th Street LLC v. xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx Simply put, the document itself for the Decision Order of Motion 11 is an illegal document, designed for predetermination, and is the accusatory instament against 119 South Street and the attorney that reps them, and this defendants co-defendants by confess, New York County District Attorney, Dr. Allan Matarasso, Steven T Greenberg c/o Greenberg Cosmetic Surgery and Dermatology, and Lenox Hill Hospital. Lastly, even in Judge Ronnie Abrams court in US District Court, I was not made knowledgeable of the connection of Charlie Sahadi projecting lies for Anna xxxxxx and Paul xxxxxx, through the mafia, until the case was dismissed. Charle Sahadi, harassed me about having a boyfriend that is a gangster, while I was being trolled by one in Sept 2020, when the facts are that gangsters are affiliated with Anna Pilato Aramans family, and crooked cops that my younger brother Paul Armaan is associated with. There is no way I will accept this organized crime decision-order coming from the platform of the legal government in State Court. The decisions rendered here through Judges are to be considered highly illegal and the most unethical. Please postpone the court date to at least the week of September 10, 2023. I also need more time to make a motion or order to show cause. It would behoove the DAs office to think about this, since the Genovese family power is associated with Rudy Guiliani and other attorneys Arthur Nalbandian, attempting to coerce me to let “Guliani, a close friends of Trump, to help me”. I have nothing to do with Trump in any way. Giuliani claims to knock down mafia is, that he knocked down other mafia families for Genovese so that they are in power. He is a criminal and a hypocrite. Guiliani helped Genovese and Gambino profile me as an escort as retaliation for their paranoia of narcotics, and use by brother with mental health problems to cover up for their family members, Anna Pilato xxxxxx. Dated: August 31, 2023 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx, Plaintiff pro se Cc: Judge Ronnie Abrams, and US Attorney Criminal Division. 2 of 6 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023 United States Attorney's OEce . Soutkern.District of New York Civilian Complaint T1nit Criminal Division CMIian Complaint Form investigative agencies The U.S. Attoniey's OEce represents thé Government in legal proceedings and works closely with States Attomey's OEoe is charged with enforcing the federal oriminal th,e FBL The Criminaf Division of the United acluding District which includes the Bronx, Dutchess, New York, Orange, Patnam, Rockland, aws within the Southern of New York, Mlivan and Westchester counties. plaint. Perseia/Entity Being Com laimed About: P rson g This Co Name Name A Address Phone Coimty Phone County we receive from concerned members of the public prevents us frosa responding Although the volume of information to every be assured we wBI carefuHy.eensider that ‰ie informatten ydu have provid d us to adividually complaint, Jetermine whether there is a matter for this U@ce to invesegate. If we determine that tour· complaintraises a matter and that further information Trom you is necessary for sur investigation, within the jurisdletion of this Office to investigate rou wiH be contacted. This Office does not resolveindividusI censumer complaints. VÃTURE OF ALLEGED ChlMINAL VIOLATION(B): Tax Frand Terrorf¾m/National Seenrity . __.Internet Fraud ___Healthcare/Medicare Fraud - ___Drugs __Publis Corrupffon/Frand/Waste Organized Crime . . __Corporate.Fraud (for ser or forced . - __Computer Environmental Crime Human Trafficking laber) Crhaes/Reeking __Child Pornography/Exploitation MortgagdBank/Credit Card/ATM Fraud 4s Mentity Theft Other (pIease explain) V\ Ùbi . Seearities Frand Does this Complaint P.ertain to an Ongoing Case? Yes __ N N T If Yes, Please Provide the FoHowing Case Info afian: Docket Number (if known): C . . Case Title and V Please describe the violation of federal criminal laws that you would like to bring to our attention. IWelude as clearly the places and nature ofincident, and conta-ctinformation for any witnesses ach information as.possible, including dates, send o¦d documen 3 of 6 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2023 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 800003/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2023 Are You e of Êy er VI (s 1 tiÁ of this ge Crim ? Are on Yes No Not 8ure No Not Sure Yes Please stŒther Victim(s): If Yes, in this Matter? ___Yes No Are You Represented by an Attorney Please Provide Attorney Contact Info: If Yes, Phone: Name: Address: this Matter? Yes _No Have You Filed a Lawsuit Concerning Please·Provide the Followin Case Information: . .. If Yes, Number: 7 Case Title and Doeket Name and Address of Court: C Status of Court Case (pending, dismissed, settled): 4M4 . . abo,ut.this Matter with this flice Any Other Federal, State or Local Havelau Previons]y Filed a Complaint _No If Yes, Date Filed: t fd- 7 3 C) _ . Ageney(s)? Yes Contae.t Person: AMyr . .Agency: N Y 45>a c r,e.J S.tatus of Previous Complaint: under the laws of the United States of America that an of or state) under penalty of perfmy I declare (or certify, verify, * to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. inf ®o true, correct and complete the foregoing Signature: F eented on this Date: 2 3 REGARDING THE PRESERVATION OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS: EdPORTANT NOTE statute of limitation that might apply to any claim you a complaint to this OfHee has no effect on any Jubmitting Office you have not commenced a lawsuit or other legal proceeding, have. a complaint to this nay By submitting believe or lawsuit the subject of your complaint. If you ad this Office has not initiated an investigation regarding seek to sue for or other relief, you should contact a private your rights have been violated and you money hat . . ittorney. complaint form to: United States Attorney's Office dail this completed Southern District of New York . . Civilian Complaint Unit (Criminal Division) Attn: . One St. Andrew's Plaza - New York, NY 10007 a a a 4 of 6 FILED: NEW INDEX NO. NO. 8OO003 800003/2022 |FILED : NEW YORK YORK COUNTY COUNTY CLERK 07 CLERK 08/31/2023 /21/2 023 05:35 12 : 55 PM PlÈ INDEX 2022 NYSCEF NYSCEF DOC. DOC. NO. NO. 166 154 RECEIVED NYSCEF: RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2O23 08/31/2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. KATHY J. KING PART 06 Justice ---------------------------____________Ç INDEX NO. 800003/2022 xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx MOTION DATE 05/02/2023 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 011 - y - STEPHEN T. GREENBERG, ALAN MATARASSO, LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, 119 SOUTH STREET MANAGEMENT LLC C/O LUCIA BARLETTA, PINO MANICA, FRANCESCO DECISION + ORDER ON MANICA, CHRISTINA MANICA, NEW YORK COUNTY MOTION DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Defendant. ___________________________..______________Ç The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 011) 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49,,50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 92, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152 were read on this motion to/for RENEW/REARGUE/RESETTLE/RECONSIDER . Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiff, xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx, moves to renew, reargue and revoke the Court's decision/order dated March 26, 2023. Defendants Stephen T. Greenberg, MD s/h/a Stephen T Greenberg c/o Greenberg Cosmetic Surgery and Dermatology, 119 South Street Management, LLC c/o Lucia Barletta, Pino Manica, Francesco Manica and Christina Manica, Dr. Alan Matarasso, and the New York County District Attorney oppose the motion. CPLR § 2221(d)(2) provides that a motion for leave to reargue "shall be based upon matters of fact or law allegedly overlooked or misapprehended by the court in determining the prior motion" motion, but shall not include any matters of fact not offered on the prior (see James v Nestor, 120 AD2d 442, 443 [1st Dept 1986]). The Court agrees with defendants, in opposition, and finds that plaintiff failed to meet her burden for leave to reargue as set forth in the CPLR, since her moving papers consist solely of 800003/2022 xxxxxx, xxxxxxxxx vs. GREENBERG, STEPHEN T. Page 1 of 2 Motion No. 011 1 of 2 5 of 6 FILED: NEW INDEX NO. NO. 800003/2022 800003/2022 (FILED: NEW YORK YORK COUNTY COUNTY CLERK 07 CLERK 08/31/2023 /21/2023 05:35 12 : 55 PM P$ INDEX NYSCEF NYSCEF DOC. DOC. NO. NO. 166 154 RECEIVED NYSCEF: RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2023 08/31/2023 self-serving characterizations of the Court's reasoning for denial of the March 26, 2023 motions, and does not identify any law that the Court misapplied or any facts that the Court overlooked or misapprehended. The Court notes that "reargument is not designed to afford the unsuccessful party successive opportunities to reargue issues previously decided ... or to present arguments asserted" different from those originally ( Matter of Setters v AI Props. & Devs. (USA) Corp., 139 AD3d 492, 492 [1st Dept 2016], quoting William P. Pahl Equip. Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks omitted] ; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-68 [1st Dept 1979]). CPLR §2221(e) provides that an application for leave to renew must be based upon additional material facts which existed at the time the prior motion was made, but were not then known to the party seeking leave to renew, and therefore, not made known to the court. Here, plaintiff presents the same facts and identical arguments that she made in support of her motions defendants' (Motion Seq. Nos. 6, 7 and 9) and in opposition to motions (Motion Seq. Nos. 1, 2, 3 5, and 8). Said facts and arguments were considered in the Court's decision/order dated March 26, 2023, thus, renewal is not warranted. Based on the foregoing, plaintiff's motion is denied in its entirety. This constitutes the decision and order of the Court. 7/20/2023 DATE KATH . .K G,J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE 800003/2022 xxxxxx, xxxxxxxxx vs. GREENBERG, STEPHEN T. Page 2 of 2 Motion No. 011 2 of 2 6 of 6