arrow left
arrow right
  • EYEMART EXPRESS LLC  vs.  THEOPHILUS TACKIE et alEMPLOYMENT document preview
  • EYEMART EXPRESS LLC  vs.  THEOPHILUS TACKIE et alEMPLOYMENT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC—17-0886] EYEMART EXPRESS, INC. § 1N THE DISTRICT COURT 0F § Plaintiff § § v. § 191“ JUDICIAL DISTRICT § THEOPHILUS TACKJE § Defendant § DALLAS COUNTY, Tx On this day came on to be heard Intervenor Third Party Plaintiff Westchester Fire Insurance Company’s Agreed Motion for Continuance and the Court after considering same is of the opinion that Motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case be removed fi‘om the trial docket on November 26, case reset for non-jury triai 0n atMam. and all W 2018, this is , deadlines in the Court’s November 22, 20 I 7 Pre-Trial Order are extended to run from the new trial date. Signedthis lsmdayofOIS. I?CL, “mi 4:5}, ‘ ' Presiding Judge AGREED: {I Michael P. M Duray, Attorney for Third Party PlaintiffWestchester Fire Insurance mg. David R. Schlottman, Attorney for Plaintifnyemart Express, 222-‘1/ Ronald 4NWL/f P. Wright, Attorney for Inc. Company (ulfemk‘m\ Defendant Theophilus Tackle