Motion for Sale of Property in U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual , plaintiff, et al VS Stanley J. Meyer Sr. , defendant, et al| Trellis.Law

On March 16, 2023 a Miscellaneous was filed involving a dispute between Capacity But Solely As Owner Trustee For, Morgan Stanley Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-Rpl1, U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual, and Henderson, Benjamin J., Henderson, Darlene A., Meyer, Stanley J. Sr., South Carolina Department Of Revenue, for Common Pleas in the District Court of Lee County.

Preview
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
COUNTY OF LEE
CASE NO. 2023-CP-31-00053
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its
individual capacity but solely as owner trustee MASTER IN EQUITY’S ORDER AND
for Morgan Stanley Residential Mortgage Loan JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND
Trust 2020-RPL1 SALE
(Deficiency Judgment Waived)
Plaintiff,

-vs-

Stanley J. Meyer Sr. (Deceased); Darlene A.
Henderson; Benjamin J. Henderson; South
Carolina Department of Revenue

Defendant(s).

TO:
Theodore von Keller, Esquire
B. Lindsay Crawford, III, Esquire
B. Lindsay Crawford, IV, Esquire
Charley S. FitzSimons, Esquire
Jason Hunter, Esquire
Brittany Morrison, Esquire
Crawford & von Keller, LLC.
PO Box 4216
1640 St. Julian Place (29204)
Columbia, SC 29204
Email: court@crawfordvk.com

Stanley J. Meyer
209 Baskin Avenue
Bishopville, SC 29010

South Carolina Department of Revenue
300-A Outlet Pointe Blvd.
Columbia, SC 29210

Darlene A. Henderson
3315 Royal Colwood Court
Sumter, SC 29150

Benjamin J. Henderson
3315 Royal Colwood Court
Sumter, SC 29150
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
Stanley J. Meyer
3315 Royal Colwood Court
Sumter, SC 29150

Pursuant to Rule 53 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter "SCRCP"), the

above-entitled matter was referred by Order of Reference to the undersigned Master in Equity to make

appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law, with authority to enter a final judgment in the

cause. Any appeal from the decision of the Master in Equity shall be directly to the South Carolina

Court of Appeals.

Pursuant to the said reference, a hearing was held and from the evidence presented, I find and

conclude as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT:

1. The Lis Pendens was filed on March 16, 2023.

2. The Summons and Complaint were filed on March 16, 2023.

3. Service was made upon the Defendants named in the Complaint as is shown by the proof of

service filed herein.

4. The Defendants, Stanley J. Meyer, Darlene A. Henderson, Benjamin J. Henderson are in

default as shown by Affidavit filed herein.

5. According to an Affidavit filed herein, no Defendant in default is in the military service of the

United States of America, as contemplated under the Service Members Civil Relief Act.

6. The Defendants were notified of the time, date and place of hearing in this matter.

7. For value received, Stanley J. Meyer made, executed and delivered a Note, dated April 23,

2008, promising thereby to pay to the order of Citifinancial, Inc. the sum of $126,486.81, with

interest at the (initial) rate of 4.9992 % per annum. Other terms and conditions are stated in the note,

which is of record herein.

8. To better secure the payment of the Note described above, Defendant Stanley J. Meyer made,
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
executed and delivered to Citifinancial, Inc.. a Mortgage, in writing dated April 23, 2008, covering

real property in Lee County, which is the same as that described in the Complaint. The Mortgage

was recorded on April 24, 2008 and is of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Lee

County in Book 431 at Page 294.

9. Thereafter, CFNA Receivables LLC fka CFNA Receivables Inc. successor by merger to

CFNA Receivables Inc. fka CitiFinancial Inc. assigned said Mortgage to CitiFinancial Servicing

LLC by assignment dated November 16, 2017, and recorded December 1, 2017, in Book 546 at

Page 276.

10. Thereafter, CitiFinancial Servicing LLC assigned said Mortgage to Wilmington Savings

Fund Society FSB as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust A by assignment dated

November 16, 2017, and recorded December 1, 2017, in Book 546 at Page 277.

11. Thereafter, Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage

Loan Trust A assigned said Mortgage to 1900 Capital Trust III by US Bank Trust National

Association not in its individual capacity but solely as Certificate Trustee by assignment dated

May 30, 2019, and recorded June 19, 2019, in Book 562 at Page 272.

12. Thereafter, 1900 Capital Trust III by US Bank Trust National Association not in its

individual capacity but solely as Certificate Trustee assigned said Mortgage to Morgan Stanley

Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC by assignment dated February 18, 2020, and recorded April 3,

2020, in Book 573 at Page 19.

13. Thereafter, Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC assigned said Mortgage to

Morgan Stanley Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-RPL1 by assignment dated November

20, 2020, and recorded December 16, 2022, in Book 606 at Page 259.

14. Thereafter, Morgan Stanley Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-RPL1 assigned said

Mortgage to U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
owner trustee for Morgan Stanley Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-RPL1 by assignment

dated March 16, 2023, and recorded April 4, 2023, in Book 610 at Page 260.

15. This Mortgage constitutes a first lien mortgage.

16. That the Plaintiff has the legal right to enforce the negotiable instrument secured by the

Mortgage and is the real property in interest as defined by Rule 17(a) of the South Carolina

Rules of Civil Procedure.

17. The titleholder of record of the subject property as of the filing of the Lis Pendens in this

action was Stanley J. Meyer, who was the original mortgagor.

18. Payment due on the Note has not been made as provided for therein, and the Plaintiff, as the

holder thereof, has elected to accelerate payment of the entire indebtedness and has placed the Note

and Mortgage in the hands of its attorney of record herein for collection. The Note provides that in

the case of default and the need for collection, the attorney is entitled to attorney’s fees, reasonable in

an amount not less than 15% of what is showing.

19. Having specifically considered each of the following: the nature, extent and difficulty of the

services rendered; the time and labor devoted to the case, including reviewing the various loan

documents, performing the title search, preparing, filing and serving the pleadings, preparing for the

hearing, including preparing the judgment and other documents requested by the Court, attending the

hearing, preparing for and having someone attend the sale, and preparing any post-sale documents

requested by the Court; the professional standing of the Plaintiff's attorney; the fee customarily

charged in this jurisdiction for similar services; and the beneficial results obtained for the Plaintiff, I

find that the sum of $3,150.00 is a reasonable attorney's fee for the Plaintiff's attorney for services

performed and anticipated to be performed until final adjudication of the within action, under the

terms of the Note and Mortgage. Services anticipated to be performed until final adjudication

contemplates completion of this matter within a reasonable time and does not include exceptional,
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
unanticipated circumstances delaying conclusion beyond the normal time.

20. The amount due and owing on the Note and Mortgage, with interest at the rate provided in

the Note, and other costs and expenses of collection, including attorney's fees, secured by the Note

and Mortgage, is as follows:

a. Principal Balance due as of November 5, 2021 $113,975.70
b. Interest from 10/05/2021 to $10,396.26
05/05/2023 at 4.99920 % per annum
c. Advancements to Escrow (insurance/taxes/any $5,409.69
other properly chargeable advancements)
d. Corporate Advances $2,307.00
e. LESS: $0.00
f. Late Charges $0.00
g. Costs of collection prior to hearing $997.06
h. Attorney’s Fee (as referenced above) $3,150.00

Total Debt secured by note and mortgage, including interest to date: $144,888.09

Interest after the date of judgment at the rate of 4.99920 % per annum, pursuant to the terms

of the note and mortgage, on the judgment debt should be added to such judgment debt to comprise

the amount of the Defendant’s debt secured by the mortgage through the date to which such interest

is computed.

21. The Plaintiff is seeking foreclosure of its mortgage and has, in the Complaint or subsequently

thereto in writing, expressly waived the right to a personal or deficiency judgment pursuant to Rule

71(b), SCRCP.

22. That Stanley J. Meyer is, upon information and belief, deceased; Stanley J. Meyer died on

July 15, 2021; and that, upon information and belief, Stanley J. Meyer died testate.

23. That the plaintiff has information as to the devise(s) and/or possible heirs-at-law of Stanley J.

Meyer since an estate for said decedent has been filed in the Office of the Probate Court for Lee

County, Estate No. 2021-ES-31-00117 that for that reason, Darlene A. Henderson and Benjamin J.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
Henderson are made party-defendants herein; and that any interest claimed by said known and

unknown Defendants is junior and subordinate to the Plaintiff's mortgage.

24. The following Defendant(s) claim or may claim lien/liens upon or interest in the subject

property; and in the event there is a surplus from the sale of the subject property, the validity, priority

and amount of any such junior lien claim will be determined at a hearing subsequent to the sale, in

accordance with Rule 71(c), SCRCP. The said Defendant(s) and such claim(s), interests, or lien(s)

is/are as follows:

a) efendant South Carolina Department of Revenue may have or claim to have an interest in
the subject property by virtue of certain tax lien filed against Darlene Henderson, in Lee
County Records as follows: Tax Lien # 3517543851. Said tax lien(s) is /are junior and
subordinate to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

b) Defendant South Carolina Department of Revenue may have or claim to have an interest
in the subject property by virtue of certain tax lien filed against Darlene Henderson, in
Lee County Records as follows: Tax Lien # 3519225234. Said tax lien(s) is /are junior
and subordinate to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

c) Defendant South Carolina Department of Revenue may have or claim to have an interest
in the subject property by virtue of certain tax lien filed against Darlene Henderson, in
Lee County Records as follows: Tax Lien # 3519688750. Said tax lien(s) is /are junior
and subordinate to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

d) Defendant South Carolina Department of Revenue may have or claim to have an interest
in the subject property by virtue of certain tax lien filed against Darlene Henderson, in
Lee County Records as follows: Tax Lien # 583204. Said tax lien(s) is /are junior and
subordinate to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

e) Defendant South Carolina Department of Revenue may have or claim to have an interest
in the subject property by virtue of certain tax lien filed against Darlene Henderson, in
Lee County Records as follows: Tax Lien # 930763. Said tax lien(s) is /are junior and
subordinate to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

25. The loan is not applicable for the Home Affordable Modification Program as that program

sunset on December 31, 2016.

26. The attorney for the Plaintiff, in compliance with The Supreme Court of South Carolina

Administrative Order Re: Mortgage Foreclosures Actions, 2011-05-02-01, has certified that after

completion of the foreclosure intervention process, the Mortgagor(s) does not qualify for loan
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
modification or other means of loss mitigation, in accordance with any standards, rules or guidelines

of the Mortgagee applicable to the mortgage loan, and the parties have been unable to reach any

other agreement concerning the foreclosure process; and, that notice of the denial of loan

modification or other means of loss mitigation, including notice that the Mortgagor(s) has/ve 30 days

from the date of mailing of notice of denial of relief to file and serve an answer or other response to

the Mortgagee’s summons and complaint, has been served on the Mortgagor(s) by mailing such

notice to all known addresses of the Mortgagor(s); and, that more than 30 days have elapsed since the

mailing of the notice described above, and no response has been received by the Mortgagee.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:

I, therefore, conclude as follows:

27. The Plaintiff has offered exhibits and the Court has accepted them.

28. The Plaintiff’s mortgage is declared to be a first lien against the subject property and the

subject collateral and any interest held by the aforementioned Defendant(s) is junior and subordinate

to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

29. The Plaintiff should have (judgment on its note, which shall be entered immediately, and it

should have) judgment of foreclosure of its mortgage; and the mortgaged property should be ordered

sold at public auction after due advertisement.

30. The Plaintiff's lien constitutes a first lien on the Mortgaged Property.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

31. That there is due to the Plaintiff on its note and mortgage the sum of $144,888.09,

representing the Total Debt due to the Plaintiff as set out in the aforementioned paragraph, together

with interest thereon at the rate provided above to the date hereof.

32. That the amount due in the preceding paragraph (the "Total Debt" as set forth in the

aforementioned paragraph, and later accrued interest and costs) shall constitute the total judgment

debt due to the Plaintiff and shall bear interest hereafter at the rate of 4.99920% per annum, pursuant
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
to the terms of the note and mortgage.

33. That the judgment amount shall be subject to increase to permit the Plaintiff to recover

additional costs, commission and expenses, including but not limited to the deposit made in

compliance with § 14-11-310, South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976. Such additional costs,

commissions and expenses may be established by affidavit and shall be adjudicated by the Court

without further hearing. The judgment may also be increased to include supplemental compensation

for attorney's services not contemplated by the initial attorney's fee award. Jurisdiction over the

attorney's fee award and total debt is reserved to the undersigned to facilitate the assessment and

payment of any such costs and/or supplemental compensation.

34. That the Defendant, Stanley J. Meyer, is liable for the aforesaid debt and shall, prior to the

date and time of the sale of the subject property, hereinafter described, pay to the Plaintiff, or the

Plaintiff's attorney, the amount of the Defendant's debt as aforesaid, together with the costs and

disbursements of this action.

35. The following defendants have no further interest in the property which is the subject of this

action and the Register of Deeds is hereby ordered to release said liens in so much as they pertain to

the property which is the subject of this action:

a) Defendant South Carolina Department of Revenue may have or claim to have an interest
in the subject property by virtue of certain tax lien filed against Darlene Henderson, in
Lee County Records as follows: Tax Lien # 3517543851. Said tax lien(s) is /are junior
and subordinate to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

d) Defendant South Carolina Department of Revenue may have or claim to have an interest
in the subject property by virtue of certain tax lien filed against Darlene Henderson, in
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
Lee County Records as follows: Tax Lien # 583204. Said tax lien(s) is /are junior and
subordinate to the lien of the Plaintiff herein.

36. That on default of payment prior to the date and time of the sale, the mortgaged premises,

and the subject collateral, hereinafter described, shall be sold by the Master in Equity at public

auction, at the Lee County Courthouse, in the County and State aforesaid, at 11:00 AM on the next

convenient sales day hereafter, on the following terms, that is to say:

a) FOR CASH: The Master in Equity shall require a deposit at the conclusion of the bidding

5% of the amount of the bid, in cash or equivalent, as evidence of good faith, the same to be

applied on the purchase price in case of compliance with the bid, but in case of non-

compliance within thirty (30) days, the same to be forfeited and applied to the costs and then

to the Defendant's debt.

b) Interest on the balance of the bid shall be paid to the day of compliance at the rate of

4.99920 % per annum.

c) The sale shall be subject to taxes and assessments, existing easements and easements and

restrictions of record.

d) Purchaser to pay for the deed and the cost of recording the deed.

37. That if the Plaintiff is the successful bidder at the said sale, for a sum not exceeding the

amount of costs, expenses and the indebtedness of the Plaintiff in full, the Plaintiff may pay to the

Master in Equity only the amount of the costs and expenses, crediting the balance of the bid on the

Plaintiff's indebtedness.

38. That a personal or deficiency judgment being waived, the bidding will not remain open after

the date of sale, but compliance with the bid may be made immediately.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
39. That, in addition to all notices to the property owner(s) which are required by the SCRCP or

other law, in a case involving property owner’s SCRCP 55 default, or any other case or circumstance

where property owner(s) would not ordinarily receive a copy of the Order of Foreclosure and/or the

Notice of Sale, the party seeking foreclosure (Foreclosing Party) shall, within 5 (five) days of the

execution of this Order cause this Order and the Notice of Sale (if available) to be served by US Mail

upon said property owner(s). An affidavit of such service shall be filed with the Clerk of Court

expeditiously. In cases where the Notice of Sale is executed later in time than the Order, service shall

be accomplished separately, and shall be sent no later than 5 (five) days from receipt by the

Foreclosing Party.

40. That the Master in Equity, by advertisement according to law, shall give notice of the time

and place of sale and the terms thereof; and that s/he will execute to the purchaser, or purchasers, a

deed to the premises sold. The Plaintiff, or any other party to this action, or any other person may

become a purchaser at such sale. Upon such sale being made, should the successful bidder, or his

assignee, fail to comply with the terms thereof within thirty (30) days after the date of sale, then the

Master in Equity may re-advertise the premises for sale on the next, or some other subsequent, sales

day, at the risk of the highest bidder, and so from time to time thereafter until a full compliance shall

be secured.

41. That the Master in Equity shall apply the proceeds of the sale as follows:

FIRST: To the payment of the amount of the costs and expenses of this action,

including any Guardian Ad Litem fee or fees of attorneys appointed under Order of Court; and

NEXT: To the payment of the amount to the Plaintiff, or the Plaintiff's Attorney, of

the amount of the Defendant's debt and interest or so much thereof as the purchase money will pay

on the same; and

NEXT: Any surplus will be held pending further Order of this Court pursuant to
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
Rule 71(c), SCRCP.

42. That it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, in the event the successful

bidder is other than the Defendant(s) in possession herein, upon the presentation of this Order or a

Writ of Assistance the Sheriff of Lee County is hereby directed to eject and remove from the

premises the occupant(s) of the property sold, together with any and all personal property located

thereon, and to put the successful bidder, or his assigns, in full, quiet and peaceable possession.

43. That it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that each Defendant(s) named

herein, and all persons whomsoever claiming under him, them or it, be forever barred and foreclosed

of all right, title, interest and equity of redemption in the said mortgaged premises so sold, or any part

thereof.

44. That it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the deed of conveyance

made pursuant to this judgment and said sale shall contain the names of only the Plaintiff, the first-

named Defendants Stanley J. Meyer, who were the titleholders of the mortgaged property at the time

of the filing of the Lis Pendens, and the Grantee; and that the Clerk of Court/Register of Deeds is

hereby authorized to omit from the indices pertaining to such conveyance the names of all parties not

contained in said deed.

45. That the Master in Equity shall retain jurisdiction to do all necessary acts incident to this

foreclosure, including, but not limited to, the issuance of a Writ of Assistance, disposing of any

surplus funds pursuant to Rule 71(c), SCRCP, and hearing any issues involving appraisal proceedings

under § 29-3-680, et seq., South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976.

46. That it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, if the Plaintiff or the

Plaintiff's representative does not appear at the scheduled sale of the mortgaged property, hereinafter

described, the Master in Equity (or the sale officer designated herein) shall pull the property from

sale; and in the event that the sale is nevertheless conducted, then such sale will be null, void and of
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
no force and effect. In such event, the sale will be rescheduled for the next or some subsequent sales

day.

47. That after the Order Confirming Sale and Disbursements has been issued and filed, the

Master in Equity shall direct the Clerk of Court/Register of Deeds to release of record the mortgage

lien being foreclosed, which mortgage lien is/are described in the Findings of Fact hereinabove.

48. That the following is a description of the premises herein ordered to be sold:

THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL ESTATE TO-WIT: ALL THAT CERTAIN PIECE,
PARCEL OR LOT OF LAND, WITH IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, CONTAINING 6828 ACRE,
MORE OR LESS, SITUATE LYING AND BEING IN THE CITY OF BISHOPVILLE, COUNTY
OF LEE, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, AND BEING BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: ON THE NORTHEAST BY BASKIN AVENUE OF SAID CITY AND MEASURING
THEREON ONE HUNDRED SEVENTYFIVE (175.00) FEET, MORE OR LESS; SOUTHEAST
BY LANDS OF JORDAN AND MEASURING THEREON ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY (170.00)
FEET, MORE OR LESS; SOUTHWEST BY LANDS OF WHITE AND MEASURING THEREON
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE (175.00) FEET, MORE OR LESS; AND NORTHWEST BY
LANDS OFFLAYER AND MEASURING THEREON ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY(170.OO)
FEET MORE OR LESS. SAID PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY REPRESENTED
AND DELINEATED ACCORDING TO A PLAT THEREOF PREPARED BY FRANKLIN D.
COOPER, JR. RLS DATED JULY 13, 1993 AND RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK A1 AT PAGE 197
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT FOR LEE COUNTY, S. C, LESS, HOWEVER
0.083 OF AN ACRE AS SHOWN ON PLAT PREPARED BY FRANKLIN D. COOPER, JR RLS
DATED DECEMBER 26, 1994 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK C-1 AT PAGE 1 IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK OF COURT FOR LEE COUNTY, S.C.

BEING THE SAME FEE SIMPLE PROPERTY CONVEYED BY DEED FROM TONY W. SMITH
TO STANLEY J. MEYER SR, DATED 05/15/1996 RECORDED ON 05/24/1996 IN BOOK K-7,
PAGE 84 IN LEE County RECORDS, STATE OF SC.

TMS #: 030-09-00-020-000

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
FORM 4
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
COUNTY OF LEE
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE NO. 2023-CP-31-00053

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual
capacity but solely as owner trustee for Morgan Stanley
Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-RPL1
PLAINTIFF
vs.
Stanley J. Meyer Sr. (Deceased); Darlene A. Henderson;
Benjamin J. Henderson; South Carolina Department of
Revenue
DEFENDANTS
Submitted by: Crawford & von Keller, LLC Attorney for Plaintiff
P.O. Box 4216, Columbia, SC 29240
Email: www.crawfordvk.com

DISPOSITION TYPE (CHECK ONE)

JURY VERDICT. This action came before the court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried
and a verdict rendered.
DECISION BY THE COURT. This action came to trial or hearing before the court. The issues
have been tried or heard and a decision rendered. See page 2 for additional information.
ACTION DISMISSED (CHECK REASON): Rule 12(b), SCRCP; Rule 41(a), SCRCP (Vol. Nonsuit);
Rule 43(k), SCRCP (Settled); Other – ______________________
ACTION STRICKEN (CHECK REASON): Rule 40(j) SCRCP; Bankruptcy;
Binding Arbitration, subject to right to restore to confirm, vacate or modify arbitration award;
Other – _________________________________
STAYED DUE TO BANKRUPTCY
DISPOSITION OF APPEAL TO THE CIRCUIT COURT (CHECK APPLICABLE BOX):
Affirmed; Reversed; Remanded; Other – ______________________
NOTE: ATTORNEYS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING LOWER COURT, TRIBUNAL, OR
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY OF THE CIRCUIT COURT RULING IN THIS APPEAL.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: See attached order (formal order to follow); Statement of Judgment by the Court:
ORDER INFORMATION

This order ends does not end the case.
Additional Information for the Clerk: Order For Judgment of Foreclosure.

INFORMATION FOR THE JUDGMENT INDEX
Complete this section below when the judgment affects title to real or personal property or if any amount should be
enrolled. If there is no judgment information, indicate “N/A” in one of the boxes below.
Judgment in Favor of Judgment Against Judgment Amount To be Enrolled
(List name(s) below) (List name(s) below) (List amount(s) below)
n/a $
$
$
If applicable, describe the property, including tax map information and address, referenced in the order: 209 Baskin Ave,
Bishopville, SC 29010, TMS #: 030-09-00-020-000
The judgment information above has been provided by the submitting party. Disputes concerning the amounts contained in this
form may be addressed by way of motion pursuant to the SC Rules of Civil Procedure. Amounts to be computed such as interest
or additional taxable costs not available at the time the form and final order are submitted to the judge may be provided to the
clerk. Note: Title abstractors and researchers should refer to the official court order for judgment details.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
E-Filing Note: In E-Filing counties, the Court will electronically sign this form using a separate electronic signature page.

The Honorable Stephen Bryan Doby, Master in Equity for Lee Judge Code Date
County
Clerk of Court Office Use Only
SCRCP Form 4C (02/2017) Page 1

This judgment was entered on the _____________ day of _________, 2023 and a copy mailed first class or placed in the
appropriate attorney’s box on this the _____________ day of _________,2023 to attorneys of record or to parties (when
appearing pro se) as follows:

B. Lindsay Crawford, III (SC Bar# 6510)
Theodore von Keller (SC Bar# 5718)
B. Lindsay Crawford, IV (SC Bar# 101707)
Charley S. FitzSimons (SC Bar# 104326)
Jason Hunter (SC Bar# 101501)
Brittany Morrison (SC Bar# 104902)
Crawford & von Keller, LLC
P.O. Box 4216
1640 St. Julian Place (29204)
Columbia, SC 29240
Phone: 803-790-2626
Email: court@crawfordvk.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Court Reporter:

E-Filing Note: In E-Filing counties, the date of Entry of Judgment is the same date as reflected on the Electronic File
Stamp and the clerk's entering of the date of judgment above is not required in those counties. The clerk will mail a copy
of the judgment to parties who are not E-Filers or who are appearing pro se. See Rule 77(d), SCRCP.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING DECISION BY THE COURT AS REFERENCED ON PAGE 1.

This action came to trial or hearing before the court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision rendered.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
Stanley J. Meyer
209 Baskin Avenue
Bishopville, SC 29010

South Carolina Department of Revenue
300-A Outlet Pointe Blvd.
Columbia, SC 29210

Darlene A. Henderson
3315 Royal Colwood Court
Sumter, SC 29150

Benjamin J. Henderson
3315 Royal Colwood Court
Sumter, SC 29150

Stanley J. Meyer
3315 Royal Colwood Court
Sumter, SC 29150
ATTORNEY(S) FOR THE DEFENDANT(S)

____________________________________
CLERK OF COURT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2023 Jun 28 4:14 PM - LEE - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2023CP3100053
Lee Common Pleas

Case Caption: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual , plaintiff,
et al VS Stanley J. Meyer Sr. , defendant, et al
Case Number: 2023CP3100053

Type: Master/Order/Foreclosure & Sale and Form 4

So Ordered

s/S. Bryan Doby, Lee County Master-in-Equity
3070

Electronically signed on 2023-06-28 14:27:39 page 16 of 16

Case Info

Judge

Clerk Of Court C P, G S, And Family Court Track Judge’s New Case

Case No.

(Subscribe to View)

Document Filed Date

June 28, 2023

Case Filing Date

March 16, 2023

County

Parties

Capacity But Solely As Owner Trustee For Plaintiff
Crawford, B. Lindsay III Attorney for the Plaintiff
Dillon, Kiera Courtney Attorney for the Defendant
Henderson, Benjamin J. Defendant
Henderson, Darlene A. Defendant
Meyer, Stanley J. Sr. Defendant
Morgan Stanley Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-Rpl1 Plaintiff
South Carolina Department Of Revenue Defendant
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Plaintiff

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Miscellaneous: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual , plaintiff, et al VS Stanley J. Meyer Sr. , defendant, et al

Preview

Related Topics

Case Info

Parties