arrow left
arrow right
  • SWEET-DONATO, WENDY vs. IN RE: THE JAMES E. SWEET AND JUDIT GRACE BENSON-SWEET TRUST AGREEMENT U/A/D 1/12/2010 Other - Matters not falling within the Other civil Subcategories document preview
  • SWEET-DONATO, WENDY vs. IN RE: THE JAMES E. SWEET AND JUDIT GRACE BENSON-SWEET TRUST AGREEMENT U/A/D 1/12/2010 Other - Matters not falling within the Other civil Subcategories document preview
  • SWEET-DONATO, WENDY vs. IN RE: THE JAMES E. SWEET AND JUDIT GRACE BENSON-SWEET TRUST AGREEMENT U/A/D 1/12/2010 Other - Matters not falling within the Other civil Subcategories document preview
  • SWEET-DONATO, WENDY vs. IN RE: THE JAMES E. SWEET AND JUDIT GRACE BENSON-SWEET TRUST AGREEMENT U/A/D 1/12/2010 Other - Matters not falling within the Other civil Subcategories document preview
  • SWEET-DONATO, WENDY vs. IN RE: THE JAMES E. SWEET AND JUDIT GRACE BENSON-SWEET TRUST AGREEMENT U/A/D 1/12/2010 Other - Matters not falling within the Other civil Subcategories document preview
  • SWEET-DONATO, WENDY vs. IN RE: THE JAMES E. SWEET AND JUDIT GRACE BENSON-SWEET TRUST AGREEMENT U/A/D 1/12/2010 Other - Matters not falling within the Other civil Subcategories document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 63522973 E-Filed 10/31/2017 09:10:55 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: THE JAMES E. SWEET AND JUDITH GRACE BENSON-SWEET TRUST CASE NO. 2016 CP 000778 AGREEMENT U/A/D 1/12/2010 / MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION BY JUDITH GRACE BENSON-SWEET The Respondent, JUDITH GRACE BENSON-SWEET, as Trustee of The James E. Sweet and Judith Grace Benson-Sweet Trust Agreement dated January 12, 2010, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby moves to dismiss the Petition filed on behalf of Wendy Sweet-Donato and Greg G. Sweet, and, as grounds therefore, would show the Court as follows: 4 A Civil Court action in Florida is commenced by filing a complaint which lists the Petitioners versus the Respondents. This Amended Petition violates the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Petitioners have filed a pleading in the same format despite the fact that their initial petition was dismissed. See Fla.R.C.P. 1.100(c). 2 This Petition is also deficient as a pleading as it violates Fla.R.C.P. 1.110 (b). The pleading must state “a short and plain statement on the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends. . . " ww, “a short and plain statement of the ultimate facts. . .” and “a demand for judgment for the relief to which the pleader deems himself or herself entitled.” One cannot read this Petition to understand what relief these Petitioners are seeking and they should be required to specify each manner of relief they seek. 3 This Petition fails to state a cause of action for an accounting as these Petitioners have no vested interest in the Trust pursuant to its terms since all assets of the Trust remain in a fully revocable and amendable Grantor Trust. Florida law does not allow these Petitioners mandatory accountings given the terms of the Trust and the Petitioners are not qualified beneficiaries under the Florida Trust Code. 4 Despite the fact that Petitioners petition was previously dismissed without prejudice, for the very same deficiencies raised in the within motion, Petitioners have made only slight changes to their petition by adding new paragraphs 3 and 4, and by combining what were previously paragraphs 25 and 26 of the original petition into paragraph 27 of the amended petition. 5. Petitioners amended petition fails to address the deficiencies originally recognized by the Court, therefore requiring both another motion to dismiss and a motion to strike, which was filed contemporaneously herewith. 6. Petitioners conduct has caused the Respondent to incur counsel fees to address the very same issues previously reviewed by this Honorable Court, with an Order in favor of the Respondents. WHEREFORE, the Respondent, JUDITH GRACE BENSON-SWEET, as Trustee of The James E. Sweet and Judith Grace Benson-Sweet Trust Agreement dated January 12, 2010, prays that this Court will dismiss the Amended Petition, and order that the Petitioners reimburse the Respondent for all counsel fees incurred in filing the within motion. /s/ Patrick J. Reilly, Esquire PATRICK J. REILLY, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 0125109 Snyder & Reilly, Trial Lawyers 355 West Venice Avenue Venice, Florida 34285 Telephone: (941) 485-9626 Facsimile: (941) 485-8163 Primary Email: pat@snyderandreilly.com and valerie@snyderandreilly.com Counsel for Respondent, JUDITH GRACE BENSON-SWEET CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been electronically filed on this © | day of October, 2017 with the Clerk of the Court via the E-Filing Portal System which will simultaneously email the same to Holly M. O’Neil, Esquire, Counsel for the Petitioners, One North Clematis Street, Suite 500, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; honeill@broadandcassel.com and eomalley@broadandcassel.com, by utilizing the Designation of Electronic Mail Address registered with the E-Filing Portal System. /s/ Patrick J. Reilly, Esquire PATRICK J. REILLY, Esquire