On July 23, 2009 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hanson, Velta,
and
Teti, Alma,
for Negligence - Other Negligence
in the District Court of Collier County.
Preview
® @ %
cae 3 %,
5) mn
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT @. % S,
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2S y “Oo
CIVIL ACTION wae —
< ‘S % ‘gyn
ELLIS HANSON and 4% “oy %
VELTA HANSON 2% 0 7
Plaintiffs,
Case No: 09-6515-CA
Vv.
ALMA TETI
Defendants.
/
DEFENDANT’S MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 1.351(D) SEEKING A RULING ON
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-
PARTY, BANK OF AMERICA
Defendant, Alma Teti, moves, pursuant to Rule 1.351(d) for a ruling on the objection
made by Plaintiffs to the Notice of Production from Non-Party, Bank of America.
Defendant further states that the documents sought from Bank of America are relevant to
the issues in this case and are likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Respectfully submitted,
GRANT, FRIDKIN, PRARSON, ATHAN &
ey
By:
<
D. Keith Wickenden, Esq.
Florida Bar No. 0897280
5551 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 501
Naples, Florida 34108
(239) 514-1000
(239) 514-0377 (fax)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via facsimile
and U.S. Mail to:
Todd M. Rich, Esq.
Edmond E. Koester, Esq.
Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
4001 Tamiami Trail North
Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
(239) 435-3535
(239) 435- 6
on this day of May, 2010.
“2 heft
D. Keith Wickerlden
"daw _liuetrabmathansoa\ule3SImotion docx
Document Filed Date
May 06, 2010
Case Filing Date
July 23, 2009
Category
Negligence - Other Negligence
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
® @ % cae 3 %, 5) mn IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT @. % S, IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2S y “Oo CIVIL ACTION wae — < ‘S % ‘gyn ELLIS HANSON and 4% “oy % VELTA HANSON 2% 0 7 Plaintiffs, Case No: 09-6515-CA Vv. ALMA TETI Defendants. / DEFENDANT’S MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 1.351(D) SEEKING A RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON- PARTY, BANK OF AMERICA Defendant, Alma Teti, moves, pursuant to Rule 1.351(d) for a ruling on the objection made by Plaintiffs to the Notice of Production from Non-Party, Bank of America. Defendant further states that the documents sought from Bank of America are relevant to the issues in this case and are likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Respectfully submitted, GRANT, FRIDKIN, PRARSON, ATHAN & ey By: < D. Keith Wickenden, Esq. Florida Bar No. 0897280 5551 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 501 Naples, Florida 34108 (239) 514-1000 (239) 514-0377 (fax)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via facsimile and U.S. Mail to: Todd M. Rich, Esq. Edmond E. Koester, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 (239) 435-3535 (239) 435- 6 on this day of May, 2010. “2 heft D. Keith Wickerlden "daw _liuetrabmathansoa\ule3SImotion docx