Preview
CAUSE N0. DC-19-14274
FRIES RESTAURANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MANAGEMENT LLC, FRIES
RESTAURANT MGMT, FRIES
RESTAURANTS MANAGEMENT
LLC, P0P RESTAURANT LLC, P0P
RESTAURANTS LLC, TACO
BUENO, AND SUN HOLDINGS INC.,
Plaintiff(s),
v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL
DISTRICT,
Defendant. 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
AGREED JUDGMENT
On this day came Plaintiff(s), by and through its/their attorney of record, and aiso came
Defendant, Dallas Central Appraisal District, by and through its attorney of record, and all parties
having announced ready for trial and jury having been waived, all matters of fact and law were
submitted to the Court.
The undersigned parties agree and stipulate that bona flde disputes and controversies exist
between the parties concerning the market or appraised value of the subject property. These
stipulations are entered into by the parties solely for the purpose of compromising and settling their
various claims, each as to the other. No other use of this stipulation may be made by the parties
hereto as concerns the claim of either party as to the other, whether having arisen in the past, now
pending, or to arise in the future, including, without limitation, subsequent disputes as to the market
or appraised value of the subject property within the DCAD’s appraisal jurisdiction in any
subsequent years. This agreement is not intended by either party as an admission of the market
value of the subject property, nor shall same be represented by either party as to the other, as an
admission. Further, the existence, terms, and contents of this Agreed Judgment shall not be
Agreed Judgment — Page 1
admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding as against either party, except as may be
necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of said judgment, either party as to the other.
The Court, having reviewed the pleadings on file herein and having reviewed the terms of
the parties’ settlement which is fully outlined herein, is of the belief that it should be in all ways
approved, accordingly;
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1. The 2019 appraised value for ad valorem taxation purposes for the property located in
Dallas County, Texas and assigned the following DCAD Account Number(s) shall be as
follows:
Account Number 2019 Appraised Value
99000000215189900 $102,030.00
99000000215190150 $101,180.00
99000000215190500 $100,000.00
99071 107207000000 $79,670.00
99130509130000000 $101,250.00
99151022380000000 $106,190.00
99151029330000000 $108,260.00
99160506230000000 $88,130.00
99160509300000000 $104,030.00
99170126100000000 $114,360.00
99832510000372800 $103,800.00
99860020000450950 $102,450.00
99870060000203100 $100,400.00
99910070000108400 $106,160.00
99980370000132650 $44,950.00
99983420000101200 $99,880.00
99992310000031100 $101,650.00
It is further Ordered that the Dallas Central Appraisal District, and its Chief Appraiser,
shall, pursuant to §42.41 of the Tax Code, correct the 2019 Appraisal Roll and other
appropriate records, as necessary, to reflect the above appraised values; and shall provide
notice of the above appraised value to the assessor for each affected taxing unit so that the
assessors can perform the post-appeal procedures required in §42.41, §42.42 and §42.43 of
the Tax Code.
3. It is further Ordered that no interest will be paid on any refund by the applicable taxing
units to the Plaintiff(s) under §42.43(b) of the Tax Code if the refund is paid within ninety
(90) days after the date the chief appraiser certifies the correction to the appraisal roll under
§42.4l of the Tax Code.
—
Agreed Judgment Page 2
4. All costs of Court are taxed against the party incurring the same.
5. This is a final and appealablejudgment disposing of all claims and all parties.
6. Each party in this action shall bear its own attorney’s fees.
7. All relief not expressly granted herein is hereby denied.
SIGNED this day of , 2021.
JUDGE PRESIDING
AGREED AS TO FORM & SUBSTANCE:
RYAN LAW
BY ”77/
EWISEALE
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
NICHOLS, JACKSON, DILLARD,
HAGER & SMITH, L.L.P.
By: gm
PETER G. SMITH
4?
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
Agreed Judgment - Page 3
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Kristi Love on behalf of Braden Metcalf
Bar No. 24055969
klove@njdhs.com
Envelope ID: 53414745
Status as of 5/14/2021 12:01 PM CST
Associated Case Party: FRIES RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT LLC
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
Dallas OfficeFilings dallasofficefilings@ryanlawyers.com 5/13/2021 1:45:05 PM SENT
Mary Cross mary.cross@ryanlawyers.com 5/13/2021 1:45:05 PM SENT
Emily Seale emily.seale@ryanlawyers.com 5/13/2021 1:45:05 PM SENT
Preview
CAUSE N0. DC-19-14274 FRIES RESTAURANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ MANAGEMENT LLC, FRIES RESTAURANT MGMT, FRIES RESTAURANTS MANAGEMENT LLC, P0P RESTAURANT LLC, P0P RESTAURANTS LLC, TACO BUENO, AND SUN HOLDINGS INC., Plaintiff(s), v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Defendant. 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AGREED JUDGMENT On this day came Plaintiff(s), by and through its/their attorney of record, and aiso came Defendant, Dallas Central Appraisal District, by and through its attorney of record, and all parties having announced ready for trial and jury having been waived, all matters of fact and law were submitted to the Court. The undersigned parties agree and stipulate that bona flde disputes and controversies exist between the parties concerning the market or appraised value of the subject property. These stipulations are entered into by the parties solely for the purpose of compromising and settling their various claims, each as to the other. No other use of this stipulation may be made by the parties hereto as concerns the claim of either party as to the other, whether having arisen in the past, now pending, or to arise in the future, including, without limitation, subsequent disputes as to the market or appraised value of the subject property within the DCAD’s appraisal jurisdiction in any subsequent years. This agreement is not intended by either party as an admission of the market value of the subject property, nor shall same be represented by either party as to the other, as an admission. Further, the existence, terms, and contents of this Agreed Judgment shall not be Agreed Judgment — Page 1 admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding as against either party, except as may be necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of said judgment, either party as to the other. The Court, having reviewed the pleadings on file herein and having reviewed the terms of the parties’ settlement which is fully outlined herein, is of the belief that it should be in all ways approved, accordingly; IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. The 2019 appraised value for ad valorem taxation purposes for the property located in Dallas County, Texas and assigned the following DCAD Account Number(s) shall be as follows: Account Number 2019 Appraised Value 99000000215189900 $102,030.00 99000000215190150 $101,180.00 99000000215190500 $100,000.00 99071 107207000000 $79,670.00 99130509130000000 $101,250.00 99151022380000000 $106,190.00 99151029330000000 $108,260.00 99160506230000000 $88,130.00 99160509300000000 $104,030.00 99170126100000000 $114,360.00 99832510000372800 $103,800.00 99860020000450950 $102,450.00 99870060000203100 $100,400.00 99910070000108400 $106,160.00 99980370000132650 $44,950.00 99983420000101200 $99,880.00 99992310000031100 $101,650.00 It is further Ordered that the Dallas Central Appraisal District, and its Chief Appraiser, shall, pursuant to §42.41 of the Tax Code, correct the 2019 Appraisal Roll and other appropriate records, as necessary, to reflect the above appraised values; and shall provide notice of the above appraised value to the assessor for each affected taxing unit so that the assessors can perform the post-appeal procedures required in §42.41, §42.42 and §42.43 of the Tax Code. 3. It is further Ordered that no interest will be paid on any refund by the applicable taxing units to the Plaintiff(s) under §42.43(b) of the Tax Code if the refund is paid within ninety (90) days after the date the chief appraiser certifies the correction to the appraisal roll under §42.4l of the Tax Code. — Agreed Judgment Page 2 4. All costs of Court are taxed against the party incurring the same. 5. This is a final and appealablejudgment disposing of all claims and all parties. 6. Each party in this action shall bear its own attorney’s fees. 7. All relief not expressly granted herein is hereby denied. SIGNED this day of , 2021. JUDGE PRESIDING AGREED AS TO FORM & SUBSTANCE: RYAN LAW BY ”77/ EWISEALE ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF(S) NICHOLS, JACKSON, DILLARD, HAGER & SMITH, L.L.P. By: gm PETER G. SMITH 4? ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Agreed Judgment - Page 3 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Kristi Love on behalf of Braden Metcalf Bar No. 24055969 klove@njdhs.com Envelope ID: 53414745 Status as of 5/14/2021 12:01 PM CST Associated Case Party: FRIES RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT LLC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Dallas OfficeFilings dallasofficefilings@ryanlawyers.com 5/13/2021 1:45:05 PM SENT Mary Cross mary.cross@ryanlawyers.com 5/13/2021 1:45:05 PM SENT Emily Seale emily.seale@ryanlawyers.com 5/13/2021 1:45:05 PM SENT