arrow left
arrow right
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC, et al  vs.  VENKAT SETHURAMAN, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED 8/28/2023 9:03 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK DALLAS CO., TEXAS Kellie Juricek DEPUTY Cause No. DC-22-11966 USA SURGICAL INC. d/b/a USA IN THE DISTRICT COURT §§§§§§§§§§§§ Consultobiz Inc. And USA CONSULTOBIZ, INC. Plaintiffs, V. 162ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT VENKAT SETHURAMAN and CHRISTY JENKINS, Defendants. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO SEVER TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW Venkat Sethuraman (“Respondent”), Counter and Third-Party Plaintiff in the above-styled and numbered cause of action and files this is response to the Motion to Sever (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendants (“Movants”). In support of the foregoing, Respondents would respectfully show the Court as follows: I. Motion for Continuance This matter is set for hearing on September l, 2023. The undersigned has been called to trial in Wintergreen TH, LLC v. MHM-Fulgrum, LLC, et al.; Cause No. DC-22-06194; in the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas, County Texas. Trial in the Wintergreen matter starts on August 29, 2023 and is expected to last 2-3 days. Respondent moves to continue the hearing on this matter due to counsel’s trial conflict. RESPONSE T0 MOTION TO SEVER PAGE 1 II. Arguments and Authorities Severance is a procedural means used by the trial court to separate a single case into two or more separate and independent lawsuits. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 41. “[A]Voiding prejudice, doing justice, and increasing convenience are the controlling reasons to allow a severance.” Guaranty Fed. Sav. Bank v. Horseshoe Operating C0., 793 S.W.2d 652, 658 (Tex. 1990). A claim is properly severable only if: (1) the controversy involves more than one cause of action, (2) the severed claim is one that would be the proper subject of a lawsuit if independently asserted, and (3) the severed claim is not so interwoven with the remaining actions that they involve the same issues and facts. Id. Although this controversy involves more than one cause of action, the remaining factors make it abundantly clear that severance would be improper. The claims raised against Third-Party Defendants are inextricable interwoven with Defendants defenses to the claims made by Plaintiffs. In essence, Respondent claim that Mohamad Asim Shamim was really the person running Defendants, Mas Marvel, and the rest of Dr. Sethuraman’s investments. At Paragraph 22 of the Counterclaim and Third-Party Claim, Respondent alleges that “the fimds that Plaintiffs claim were stolen or converted by Counter- Plaintiff were voluntarily released by or on behalf of Shamim, as Plaintiffs’ authorized representatives, as payments and distributions from Counter-Plaintiff’s non-medical investments with Shamim.” As a result, severance is improper and the Motion should be denied. In the alternative, Respondent moves for leave to replead to better establish the interwoven nature of the claims. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Respondent respectfully requests that the Court deny the Motion and grant him such further and additional relief to which he may show himself to be justly entitled. RESPONSE T0 MOTION TO SEVER PAGE 2 Respectfully submitted, HOLMGREN JOHNSON: MITCHELL MADDEN, LLP By: /s/ Dennis Holmgren Dennis Holmgren State Bar No. 24036799 Email: dennis@hjmmlegal.com 12801 N. Central Expressway, Suite 140 Dallas, Texas 75243 Telephone: 972-484-7780 Facsimile: 972-484-7743 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS AND COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on counsel of record according to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure on August 28, 2023. /s/ Dennis Holmgren Dennis Holmgren RESPONSE TO MOTION TO SEVER PAGE 3 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Tania Flores on behalf of Dennis Holmgren Bar No. 24036799 tflores@hjmmlegal.com Envelope ID: 79000191 Filing Code Description: Response Filing Description: DEF/RESPONSE TO MOTION SEVER Status as of 8/29/2023 8:56 AM CST Associated Case Party: USA SURGICAL INC. D/B/A CONSULTOBIZ, INC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status JOSHUA CARPENTER josh@carplawfirm.com 8/28/2023 9:03:38 PM SENT Josh Carpenter filing@carp|awfirm.com 8/28/2023 9:03:38 PM SENT Todd Cohen toddcohen@carplawfirm.com 8/28/2023 9:03:38 PM SENT KURT SELIESON KURTE@CARPLAWFIRM.COM 8/28/2023 9:03:38 PM SENT Christopher J.Snyder chris@carplawfirm.com 8/28/2023 9:03:38 PM SENT Associated Case Party: VENKAT SETHURAMAN Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Dennis Holmgren dennis@hjmmlegal.com 8/28/2023 9:03:38 PM SENT Tania Flores tflores@hjmmlegal.com 8/28/2023 9:03:38 PM SENT