arrow left
arrow right
  • DAVID NGUYEN  vs.  PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • DAVID NGUYEN  vs.  PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • DAVID NGUYEN  vs.  PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • DAVID NGUYEN  vs.  PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • DAVID NGUYEN  vs.  PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • DAVID NGUYEN  vs.  PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED 3/12/2020 1:39 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK DALLAS CO., TEXAS Rhonda Burks DEPUTY CAUSE NO. DC—19-2039l DAVID NGUYEN § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § VS. § 134m JUDICIAL DISTRICT § PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL § INSURANCE COMPANY § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION T0 TRANSFER VENUE. NOW COMES DAVID NGUYEN (“Plaintiff’) and files this response to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue and shows the following in support: 1. The case should not be transferred to Ellis County. 2. The Plaintiff resides in Dallas County. The contract between Plaintiff and Defendant upon which the basis 0f this lawsuit is formed, being the insurafice policy, was entered into and performable in Dallas County. The venue statute that controls the venue for this lawsuit is permissive. The law allows the lawsuit to be brought either: (1) in the county where the policyholder resided in at the time of the accident with an uhderinsured or uninsured motorist; 0r (2) where the accident occurred. Texas Ins. Code §1952.1 10. Likewise, §15.032 of the Texas Insurance Code allows for the same venue selection. In this case, it is undisputed that the accident occurred in Ellis County. In this case, Plaintiff resided in Dallas County at the time of the accident. In this case, Plaintiff resided in Dallas County at the time the insurance policy in controversy was issued. The evidence of the contract will be gathered in Dallas County and in Ellis County. Neither party resides or maintains its corporate offices in Ellis County. 10. §15.002(b) 0f the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code is not applicable because having the lawsuit in Dallas County will not inconvenience the parties or witnesses because: (1) Plaintiff’s attorney is in Tarrant County; (2) Defendant’s attorney is in Dallas County; (3) Plaintiff is in Dallas County; (4) Plaintiff’s Medical Witnesses are in Dallas 0r Tarrant Counties; (5) Defendant’s Corporate Representative is NOT 0r has NOT been shown t0 be in Ellis County; and (6) Other witnesses can be proven up by ‘ affidavit. 11. Plaintiff chose t0 file this lawsuit in Dallas County in acéordance with §1952.1 10 0f the Texas Insurance Code. 12. Therefore, Defendant will not be served by any form 0f injustice by the lawsuit being maintained in Dallas County. WHEREFORE PREMESIS CONSIDRED, Plaintiff prays the Court deny Defendant’s Motion t0 Transfer venue. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Anthony Green Anthony Green SBOT 24043702 David S. Kohm & Associates 1414 W. Randoll Mill Rd. Arlington, TX 76012 (817) 226-8100 (817) 861-8900 fax anthonyg@att0rneyk0hm .com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Certificate 0f Service: On March 12, 2020, a copy of this response was served on the following pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 21a. /s/ Anthony Green Anthony Green WALTERS, BALIDO & CRAIN, L.L.P. RANDALL WALTERS MEADOW PARK TOWER, STE. 1500 10440 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY DALLAS,TX 75231 WALTERSEDOCSNOTIFICATIONS@WB CLAWFIRMCOM