arrow left
arrow right
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
  • Odili U. Oputa vs. Bay Matrix, LLCOther Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. -306522 ODILI U. OPUTA IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, FORT BENDCOUNTY, TEXAS BAY MATRIX, LLC Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT, BAY MATRIX, LLC’S ORIGINAL ANSWER SUBJECT TO MOTION TO STAY Defendant Bay Matrix, LLC (“Defendant” or “Bay Matrix ) files this Original Answer Subject to Motion to Stay, and respectfully shows as follows: GENERAL DENIAL Pursuant to Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant generally denies all the allegations contained in Plaintiffs Original Petition (“Petition”) and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant further reserves any and all rights held under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure for subsequent amendment of this pleading. RAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant Bay Matrix, LLC respectfully requests that Plaintiff take nothing by way of his claims and that Defendant have such other and further reliefto which may justly be entitled or that the Court deems proper. Respectfully submitted, OHREER AW IRM PLLC E. Michelle Bohreer State Bar No. 06717100 Pritesh Soni State Bar No. 777 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 950 Houston, Texas 770 Telephone: 3006 Facsimile: michelle@bohreerlaw.com pritesh@bohreerlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT BAY MATRIX, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been delivered or forwarded to all counsel and unrepresented persons as listed below, ] by personal delivery or receipted delivery service, or [ ] by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, by depositing the same, postpaid, in an official deposit under the care and custody of the United States Postal Service, or [ | by facsimile to the recipient's facsimile number identified below, or [ X ] by service to the recipient’s email address identified below and the electronic transmission was reported as complete, on this the day of September , in accordance with the Rule 21a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure: George H. Rau III Henneman Rau Kirklin & Smith LLP 815 Walker Street, Suite 1440 Houston, TX Email: grau@hrkslaw.com Telephone: 6030 Facsimile: 6141 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF smb 40 E. Michelle Bohreer