arrow left
arrow right
  • TRO-X, L.P.  vs.  EAGLE OIL & GAS CO, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • TRO-X, L.P.  vs.  EAGLE OIL & GAS CO, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC- 1 6-01439 TRO-X, L.P., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, g V. g 116TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT EAGLE OIL & GAS CO., g Defendant. g DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF TRO-X. L.P.’S MOTION FOR CONTINUAN CE On this day, came on to be heard, Plaintiff TRO-X, L.P.’s (“TRO-X”) Motion for Continuance (the “Motion”). Having considered the pleadings on file, the response, if any, the admissible evidence on file, and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that TRO- X’s Motion should be GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant Eagle Oil & Gas Co.’s (“Eagle” or “Defendant”) Motion for Traditional Summary Judgment on Statute of Limitations and Laches is continued until Eagle has fully and completely responded to TRO-X's written discovery and TRO- X has been able to depose Pat Bolin and Matt Schroeder. Signed this day of , 2022. Hon. Tonya Parker, Presiding Judge, 116‘“ District Court, Dallas County, Texas ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF TRO—X, L.P.’s MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE - Page l