On February 20, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Museum Tower, Lp,
and
Austin Building Company,
for CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. DC-18-02358
MUSEUM TOWER, LP IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
Plaintifl"
V.
AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY
Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff WWWWWWWWWWWW
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
V.
EGR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Third Party Defendant 162'“ JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY’S TRADITIONAL
AND NO-EVIDENCE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF
MUSEUM TOWER, LP
On this date came 0n for consideration Defendant Austin Building Company’s
Traditional and No-Evidence Motions for Summary Judgment as t0 Plaintiff Museum Tower, LP
(the “Motion”). The Court, after having considered the Motion, responses and replies thereto,
and arguments of counsel, determines that the Motion should be denied.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
SIGNED 0n this the day of September, 2019
Honorable Maricela Moore
162nd District Court Judge
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY’S TRADITIONAL AND NO-
EVIDENCE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF MUSEUM
TOWER, LP — Solo Page
Document Filed Date
August 29, 2019
Case Filing Date
February 20, 2018
Category
CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. DC-18-02358 MUSEUM TOWER, LP IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintifl" V. AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff WWWWWWWWWWWW DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS V. EGR CONSTRUCTION, INC. Third Party Defendant 162'“ JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY’S TRADITIONAL AND NO-EVIDENCE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF MUSEUM TOWER, LP On this date came 0n for consideration Defendant Austin Building Company’s Traditional and No-Evidence Motions for Summary Judgment as t0 Plaintiff Museum Tower, LP (the “Motion”). The Court, after having considered the Motion, responses and replies thereto, and arguments of counsel, determines that the Motion should be denied. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. SIGNED 0n this the day of September, 2019 Honorable Maricela Moore 162nd District Court Judge ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY’S TRADITIONAL AND NO- EVIDENCE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF MUSEUM TOWER, LP — Solo Page