On October 09, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Blanchard Refining Company Llc,
Marathon Petroleum Company Lp,
and
Industrial Specialists, Llc,
for Contract - Debt
in the District Court of Galveston County.
Preview
Received: : 2/8/2018 6:56
Envelope NO. 22407626
PM
‘
.
1-
_
'
_,__.__._..,——
17— CV- 1242
DCORDER
Order
fl
ififiiflix\\\\\m\\\\\\\\||\“\\\ W
20::Ii'a~;n-A:R I 3 AH I58
NO. 17-CV-1242
‘
BLANCHARD REFINING COMPANY § 1N THE DISTRIC ;.
016mm“ cm K
LLC and MARATHON PETROLEUM § GALVEC {3‘4 COU’aTY TEXAS
COMPANY LP '
§
§
v. § OF GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS
‘
§
5
INDUSTRIAL SPECIALISTS, LLC
W § 212TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
The Court has now considered the Motion for Protection from Discovery filed by defendant
Industrial Specialists, LLC’s (“ISI”). Upon due consideration, the Court is 0f the opiniofi that the
motion should be and hereby is DENIED.
The Court further finds that ISI’s objections, if any, t0 Plaintiffs’ First Requests for
t
Producfion have been waived and are, therefore, OVERRULED.
>
It is, further, ORDERED that ISI shall serve responses t0 Plaintiffs’ Request for Disclosure
and Plaintiffs’ First Requests for Production, and produce any and all documents responsive to
$uch requests, within seven (7) days of the date of this Order.
ORDERED that all
'
It is further, costs 0f production 0f responsive documents incurred in
connection with ISI’s response to Plaintiffs’ First Requestfor Production shall beibome by ISI.
SIGNED -
. f. M
'
JUDGE PRESIDING
Document Filed Date
March 12, 2018
Case Filing Date
October 09, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Received: : 2/8/2018 6:56 Envelope NO. 22407626 PM ‘ . 1- _ ' _,__.__._..,—— 17— CV- 1242 DCORDER Order fl ififiiflix\\\\\m\\\\\\\\||\“\\\ W 20::Ii'a~;n-A:R I 3 AH I58 NO. 17-CV-1242 ‘ BLANCHARD REFINING COMPANY § 1N THE DISTRIC ;. 016mm“ cm K LLC and MARATHON PETROLEUM § GALVEC {3‘4 COU’aTY TEXAS COMPANY LP ' § § v. § OF GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS ‘ § 5 INDUSTRIAL SPECIALISTS, LLC W § 212TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT The Court has now considered the Motion for Protection from Discovery filed by defendant Industrial Specialists, LLC’s (“ISI”). Upon due consideration, the Court is 0f the opiniofi that the motion should be and hereby is DENIED. The Court further finds that ISI’s objections, if any, t0 Plaintiffs’ First Requests for t Producfion have been waived and are, therefore, OVERRULED. > It is, further, ORDERED that ISI shall serve responses t0 Plaintiffs’ Request for Disclosure and Plaintiffs’ First Requests for Production, and produce any and all documents responsive to $uch requests, within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. ORDERED that all ' It is further, costs 0f production 0f responsive documents incurred in connection with ISI’s response to Plaintiffs’ First Requestfor Production shall beibome by ISI. SIGNED - . f. M ' JUDGE PRESIDING