arrow left
arrow right
  • LEON TAYLOR VS. DOUGLAS MURAWSKI et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • LEON TAYLOR VS. DOUGLAS MURAWSKI et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • LEON TAYLOR VS. DOUGLAS MURAWSKI et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • LEON TAYLOR VS. DOUGLAS MURAWSKI et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • LEON TAYLOR VS. DOUGLAS MURAWSKI et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • LEON TAYLOR VS. DOUGLAS MURAWSKI et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
						
                                

Preview

ee HU NOURE OAT San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-01-2002 12:44 pm Case Number: CUD-02-603481 Filing Date: Oct-01-2002 12:44 Juke Box: 001 Image: 00518891 ORDER et al LEON TAYLOR VS. DOUGLAS MURAWSK| 001000518891 Instructions: documentto be scanned. Please place this sheet on to p of the / "Ny ANDREW M. ZACKS (SBN 147794) RONALD D. SCHIVO (SBN 139524) o, tt; Pry 2 CURTIS F. DOWLING (SBN 188091) ZO UD r 3 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW M. ZACKS 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 2002 gp y Seo 4 San Francisco, California 94104 COR, ae PH y 46 Telephone: (415) 956-8100 “hog gpA 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff LEON TAYLOR OPP ae 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA >> COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION 11 12 LEON TAYLOR, Case No.: 603481 13 Plaintiff, ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING OF PLAINTIFF LEON 14 Vv. TAYLOR’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO 15 DOUGLAS MURAWSKI, et al. WRITTEN DISCOVERY REQUESTS, AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff LEON TAYLOR’s ex parte application for an order shortening time for hearing 20 of his motion to compel defendants’ responses to written discovery requests was heard and 21 considered by the court on October 1, 2002, at 11:00 a.m., in the discovery department of the 22 above-entitled court, before the Honorable Everett A. Hewlett, Presiding, 23 The court, having considered plaintiff's ex parte application, and any opposition thereto, 24 and good cause appearing therefor; 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 26 1 Plaintiff's ex parte application is GRANTED. More specifically, plaintiff's 27 motion to compel responses to written discovery requests shall be heard on October ] ,» 2002, 28 Taylor v. Murawski, et al., Case #603481 Order Shortening Time for Hearing of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 1 NY ~~ at _ hb: 30 fas in department {2— 6 of the above-entitled court, Plaintiff shall file and serve his motion by hand-delivery or facsimile no later than 4:00 p.m. on October 2002, and defendants’ opposition, if any, to the motion shall be filed and served by hand-delivery or facsimile on opposing counsel no later than 4:00 p.m. on October e 2002, Plaintiff waives a Cnt 7g Cag es FZ bd pirgrt lel be lo dyed iN beam ee written reply. (Ge Ln, Dated: October | 2002 rot Honorable erett ewlett Commissioner of the Superior Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Taylor y. Murawski, et al., Case #603481 Order Shortening Time for Hearing of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses