Preview
CAUSE NO. 20
ROBERT SULZBACH, AND SANDRA
“SANDY” SULZBACH,
vs.
JAMERA CUSTOM HOMES, INC.
vs.
457TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
MAGDA GARZA, JUAN GARZA,
ANA GARZA, AND
BUILDERS, INC.,
Defendants,
vs.
CONRADO RAMIREZ; J. DOMINGO
LOPEZ; JRI AIR INSTALL; GERADO
LOPEZ; JOEL VILLARREAL; JOSE J.
GARCIA; JOSE LORETO HUERTA;
ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ; EL TIGRE
CARPET, MACARIO de LEON, and
METRO LIVING STUDIOS,
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS
BUILDERS, INC.ORIGINAL ANSWER
Magda Garza, Juan Garza, Ana Garza, and Garan Builders Inc.
Original Answer to Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amended Petition and would respectfully
ENERAL ENIAL
As is their right pursuant to Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure,
s Magda Garza, Juan Garza, Ana Garza, and Garan Builders Inc. generally
each and every allegation of Plaintiff Fifth Amended Petition and demand
EFENDANTS RIGINAL NSWER AGE
FFIRMATIVE EFENSES
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing General Denial, Defendants
assert, pursuant to Rule 94 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the following affirmative
defenses, which singly or in combination, bar Plaintiff right to recover, in whole or in
part, the damages alleged in Plaintiff Fixed Fifth Amended Petition
Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, because Plaintiffs failed to
use reasonable diligence to mitigate their damages, if any, resulting from Defendants’
alleged wrongdoing, if any.
Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by Plaintiffs’ own negligent and/or intentional
act(s) and/or omission(s); or, in the alternative, Plaintiffs’ recovery, if any, must be
reduced in proportion to Plaintiffs’ own negligence, in the event that such negligence is
insufficient to bar Plaintiffs’ recovery in its entirety.
Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, because the act(s) and/or
omission(s) of which Plaintiffs complain were committed by persons beyond Defendants’
supervision and control
ntiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the applicable statues of
limitations
PECIAL XCEPTION
to Rule 47(c) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants
specially except to Paragraph 8 of Plaintiff Fixed Fifth Amended Original Petition in
that it alleges only that Plaintiffs seek monetary relief over $1,000,000.00. Therefore,
Defendants request that the Court require Plaintiffs to amend their petition to specify the
maximum amount of unliquidated damages claimed.
EFENDANTS RIGINAL NSWER AGE
IGHT TO MEND
Defendant reserve the right to amend their answer in accordance with the
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
RAYER
For these reasons, Defendants Magda Garza, Juan Garza, Ana Garza, and Garan
Builders Inc. pray that Plaintiff take nothing by their suit, and that Defen recover
thei attorney’s fees and costs together with such other and further relief to which they
may be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Michael D. Moody
Michael D. Moody
State Bar No. 24041510
mmoody@cstrial.com
Bethany G. Gingras
State Bar No. 24120852
bgingras@cstrial.com
AIN KARNULIS PLLC
303 Colorado Street, Suite 2850
Austin, Texas 78701
512 477 5000
512 477 5011 Facsimile
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been forwarded to all
counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure on January
/s/ Michael D. Moody
Michael D. Moody
EFENDANTS RIGINAL NSWER AGE