arrow left
arrow right
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
  • Robert Sulzbach, Sandy Sulzbach VS. Jamera Custom Homes, Inc., Strucsure Home Warranty, LLCContract Consumer/Commercial/Debt >$200,000 document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. 20 ROBERT SULZBACH, AND SANDRA “SANDY” SULZBACH, vs. JAMERA CUSTOM HOMES, INC. vs. 457TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MAGDA GARZA, JUAN GARZA, ANA GARZA, AND BUILDERS, INC., Defendants, vs. CONRADO RAMIREZ; J. DOMINGO LOPEZ; JRI AIR INSTALL; GERADO LOPEZ; JOEL VILLARREAL; JOSE J. GARCIA; JOSE LORETO HUERTA; ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ; EL TIGRE CARPET, MACARIO de LEON, and METRO LIVING STUDIOS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS BUILDERS, INC.ORIGINAL ANSWER Magda Garza, Juan Garza, Ana Garza, and Garan Builders Inc. Original Answer to Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amended Petition and would respectfully ENERAL ENIAL As is their right pursuant to Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, s Magda Garza, Juan Garza, Ana Garza, and Garan Builders Inc. generally each and every allegation of Plaintiff Fifth Amended Petition and demand EFENDANTS RIGINAL NSWER AGE FFIRMATIVE EFENSES Subject to and without waiving the foregoing General Denial, Defendants assert, pursuant to Rule 94 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the following affirmative defenses, which singly or in combination, bar Plaintiff right to recover, in whole or in part, the damages alleged in Plaintiff Fixed Fifth Amended Petition Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, because Plaintiffs failed to use reasonable diligence to mitigate their damages, if any, resulting from Defendants’ alleged wrongdoing, if any. Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by Plaintiffs’ own negligent and/or intentional act(s) and/or omission(s); or, in the alternative, Plaintiffs’ recovery, if any, must be reduced in proportion to Plaintiffs’ own negligence, in the event that such negligence is insufficient to bar Plaintiffs’ recovery in its entirety. Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, because the act(s) and/or omission(s) of which Plaintiffs complain were committed by persons beyond Defendants’ supervision and control ntiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the applicable statues of limitations PECIAL XCEPTION to Rule 47(c) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants specially except to Paragraph 8 of Plaintiff Fixed Fifth Amended Original Petition in that it alleges only that Plaintiffs seek monetary relief over $1,000,000.00. Therefore, Defendants request that the Court require Plaintiffs to amend their petition to specify the maximum amount of unliquidated damages claimed. EFENDANTS RIGINAL NSWER AGE IGHT TO MEND Defendant reserve the right to amend their answer in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. RAYER For these reasons, Defendants Magda Garza, Juan Garza, Ana Garza, and Garan Builders Inc. pray that Plaintiff take nothing by their suit, and that Defen recover thei attorney’s fees and costs together with such other and further relief to which they may be justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael D. Moody Michael D. Moody State Bar No. 24041510 mmoody@cstrial.com Bethany G. Gingras State Bar No. 24120852 bgingras@cstrial.com AIN KARNULIS PLLC 303 Colorado Street, Suite 2850 Austin, Texas 78701 512 477 5000 512 477 5011 Facsimile ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been forwarded to all counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure on January /s/ Michael D. Moody Michael D. Moody EFENDANTS RIGINAL NSWER AGE