arrow left
arrow right
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
  • Marshall Smith vs. Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision ATVConsumer/Commercial Debt - Under $250,000 document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. 23-05-07559 MARSHALL SMITH IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff , JUDICIAL DISTRICT DYNAMIC ENGINE SOLUTIONS, LLC d/b/a PRECISION A Defendant MONTGOMERYCOUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANTDYNAMIC ENGINE SOLUTIONS LLC D/B/A PRECISION A ’S ORIGINAL ANSWER Defendant Dynamic Engine Solutions, LLC d/b/a Precision A (“Defendant”/ Precision”) file this Original Answer and respectfully show the Court as follows: GENERAL DENIAL Precision generally denies the allegations in Plaintiff’s Original Petition as is authorized by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and respectfully request that Plaintiff be required to prove his charges and allegations against them by a preponderance of the evidence as required by the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Plaintiff’s claims fail in whole or in part due to Plaintiff’s consent. Plaintiff’s claims fail in whole or in part due to waiver on the part of Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s claims fail in whole or in part due to Plaintiff’s own acts or omissions. aintiff’s claims fail in whole or in part due to the doctrine of estoppel. DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER Plaintiff’s claims fail in whole or in part due to Defendant’s reliance on the representations of Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s claims fail in whole or in part due Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. URY REQUEST Precision asserts their right to a trial by jury and tender the required fee in accordance with the Local Rules and Rules of Civil Procedure. PRAYER WHEREFORE, premises considered, Defendant Precision prays that Plaintiff take nothing by this lawsuit, that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice, and that Defendants be awarded their reasonable attorneys’ fees costs of court, and all other relief to which it may be entitled under CPRC 37.009, or as otherwise allowed by law. Dated: June 28, 2023 Respectfully submitted, QUADROS, MIGL & CROSBY, PLLC By: /s/ Shannon A.S. Quadros Shannon A.S. Quadros Texas Bar No.: 24072766 Email: squadros@qmclaw.com Boyd S. Hoekel Texas Bar No.: 24002298 Email: bhoekel@qmclaw.com 712 Main Street, Ste. 1100 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: 713-300-9662 Fax: 214-731-3117 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT PRECISION ATV DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregone pleading has been served on May 26, 2023, to the parties listed below as follows: Travis Owens Conner Tichota Owens Law Group, PLLC P.O. Box 8605 The Woodlands, TX 77387 Via the Court’s Efiling System Shannon A.S. Quadros Shannon A.S. Quadros DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER