arrow left
arrow right
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
  • RIVER OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS INC vs. BARBOUTI, HAIDAR OTHER CIVIL document preview
						
                                

Preview

INC. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS HAIDAR BARBOUTI, JUDICIAL DISTRICT HE DEPOSITION OF RIVER OAKS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE JERALYNN MANOR: Intervenor Mark Shinder (“Shinder”) files this Motion to Quash and Motion for Protection and would respectfu UASH AND “A person from whom discovery is sought, and any other person affected by the discovery request, may move within the time permitted for response to the discovery request for an order protecting that person from the discovery sought.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 192.6(a). Moreover, “a party may object to the time and place designated for an oral deposition by motion for protective order or by motion to quash the notice of deposition.” On August 16, 2023, Defendant 2300 River Oaks, Inc., (“Defendant”) issued a notice of deposition for Plaintiff River Oaks Property Owners, Inc.’s Corporate Representative for Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. as well as Melinda Lee’s deposition for the same time. ( Notice of Deposition of ROPOs Corporate Prior to that and after this Court Ordered the deposition of Aysar Barbouti, on August 10, 2023, Intervenor Mark Shinder issued a notice of deposition for Aysar Barbouti for August 25, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. ( Notice of Deposition of Aysar Barbouti; Despite multiple requests for Aysar Barbouti’s deposition following the Court’s Order, Defendant astoundingly refuses to comply with this Court’s Order. ( Order Compelling Deposition of Aysar Barbouti; Ex. D); ( Mahendru Emails; Ex. E and F). It is clear that Defendant will continue to utterly disregard this Court’s Orders, whether to produce Aysar Barbouti or produce the additional declaration of Phillipe Meyer in response to the motion to show authority. Because Aysar Barbouti’s deposition was set before any deposition notice for ROPO’s corporate representative, this Court must quash the deposition. The parties can certainly take Aysar Barbouti later in the day on August 25 following the conclusion of the ROPO corporate representative deposition, but as the Court can see from the correspondence above, Defendant refuses to provide any information on rescheduling Aysar Barbouti’s deposition. For this reason, this Court must quash the ROPO corporate repre deposition. II. ONCLUSION Intervenor respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion for protection and motion to quash. Because this motion to quash is served within three days of the service of the notice, River Oaks Property Owners, Inc’s corporate representative’s deposition is automatically stayed. Tex. R. Civ. P. 199.6. Intervenor further requests all such other and further relief to which he is entitled at law or in equity. Dated: August 17, 2023 Respectfully submitted, MAHENDRU, P.C. By: Ashish Mahendru State Bar No. Darren A. Braun State Bar No. Houston, Texas Tele Facsimile: amahendru@thelitigati dbraun@thelitigationgr CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been served on all counsel of record on this the 17th day of August, 2023 under the Texas Ashish Mahendru