On August 20, 2019 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rideout, Carolyn Monette,
and
for Petition for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
LANAK & HANNA, P.C.
Amber N. Kim, Esq. (Bar No. 305247)
Tracy A. Stevenson, Esq. (Bar N0. 162408)
Natasha K. Buchanan, Esq. (Bar No. 267353) I LE D
625 The City Drive South, Suite 190 sUPERIORFCEUR'T‘gESnggfigm
orange, CA 92868 CQXSEESNARDNQ mSTRICT
Telephone: (714) 620-2350
Facsimile: (714) 703—1610 OCT 3 1 2m
ankim@1anak-hanna.com
tastevenson@lanak-hanna.com
”
@
nkbuchanan 1anak—hanna.com BY
BR‘TTNEY SPEARS,
DEPUTY
Attorneys for
Surety, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
p—A
o COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
h-d ’—‘
H N In re the Estate of Case N0. PROPS 1900719
lanak&hanna
a SURETY’S OPPOSITION TO DORIS
th z
a
FRIEDRICH WILHEM GRABHORN,
Decedent.
REUSCH’S PETITION TO ENFORCE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
REQUEST FOR SURCHARGE, CONTEMPT
AND DAMAGES
a Date: October 31, 2022
Time: 9:00 AM
3 Dept: S37
,_; OO
19
20
Surety, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company (“USSIC” or “Surety”), submits the following
21
Opposition to Doris Reusch’s Petition t0 Enforce Settlement Agreement and Request For Surcharge,
22
Contempt and Damages (“Petition”).
23
I. INTRODUCTION
24
The Surety was not served with the Petition, but upon its review of the Petition, the Opposition
25
by Carolyn Rideout, the Reply to the Opposition, and the transcript 0f the April 21, 2022 hearing in this
26
matter, USSIC opposes the requests made by Ms. Reusch.
27
The Petition is procedurally improper and moot since the settlement agreement between Ms.
28
{1933 29308} 1
SURETY’S OPPOSITION TO DORIS REUSCH’S PETITION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR
SURCHARGE, CONTEMPT AND DAMAGES
a
1
Document Filed Date
October 31, 2022
Case Filing Date
August 20, 2019
Category
Petition for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary
Status
Under Court Supervision
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
LANAK & HANNA, P.C. Amber N. Kim, Esq. (Bar No. 305247) Tracy A. Stevenson, Esq. (Bar N0. 162408) Natasha K. Buchanan, Esq. (Bar No. 267353) I LE D 625 The City Drive South, Suite 190 sUPERIORFCEUR'T‘gESnggfigm orange, CA 92868 CQXSEESNARDNQ mSTRICT Telephone: (714) 620-2350 Facsimile: (714) 703—1610 OCT 3 1 2m ankim@1anak-hanna.com tastevenson@lanak-hanna.com ” @ nkbuchanan 1anak—hanna.com BY BR‘TTNEY SPEARS, DEPUTY Attorneys for Surety, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA p—A o COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO h-d ’—‘ H N In re the Estate of Case N0. PROPS 1900719 lanak&hanna a SURETY’S OPPOSITION TO DORIS th z a FRIEDRICH WILHEM GRABHORN, Decedent. REUSCH’S PETITION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR SURCHARGE, CONTEMPT AND DAMAGES a Date: October 31, 2022 Time: 9:00 AM 3 Dept: S37 ,_; OO 19 20 Surety, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company (“USSIC” or “Surety”), submits the following 21 Opposition to Doris Reusch’s Petition t0 Enforce Settlement Agreement and Request For Surcharge, 22 Contempt and Damages (“Petition”). 23 I. INTRODUCTION 24 The Surety was not served with the Petition, but upon its review of the Petition, the Opposition 25 by Carolyn Rideout, the Reply to the Opposition, and the transcript 0f the April 21, 2022 hearing in this 26 matter, USSIC opposes the requests made by Ms. Reusch. 27 The Petition is procedurally improper and moot since the settlement agreement between Ms. 28 {1933 29308} 1 SURETY’S OPPOSITION TO DORIS REUSCH’S PETITION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR SURCHARGE, CONTEMPT AND DAMAGES a 1