arrow left
arrow right
  • RECOVERY FUNDING SERVICE LLC  vs.  JAMES AMOS, Jr, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RECOVERY FUNDING SERVICE LLC  vs.  JAMES AMOS, Jr, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RECOVERY FUNDING SERVICE LLC  vs.  JAMES AMOS, Jr, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RECOVERY FUNDING SERVICE LLC  vs.  JAMES AMOS, Jr, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RECOVERY FUNDING SERVICE LLC  vs.  JAMES AMOS, Jr, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RECOVERY FUNDING SERVICE LLC  vs.  JAMES AMOS, Jr, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-21-11479 RECOVERY FUNDING SERVICE, IN THE DISTRICT COURT §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ LLC as assignee of HATTON W. SUMNERS FOUNDATION FOR THE STUDY AND TEACHING OF THE SCIENCE OF SELF-GOVERNMENT, INC. d/b/a SUMNERS FOUNDATION, Plainttffl v. 162ml JUDICIAL DISTRICT JAMES AMOS, JR., STEPHEN A. BATMAN, WILLIAM D. GROSS, DENNIS MCCUISTION, REAGAN STEWART, AND MICHAEL L. WHALEN, Defendants. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS AMOS, BATMAN. STEWART, AND WHALEN’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS Came on for consideration Defendants James Amos, Jr., Stephen A. Batman, Reagan Stewart, and Michael L. Whalen’s ("Defendants”) Original Chapter 27 Anti—SLAPP Motion to Dismiss, Amended Chapter 27 Anti—SLAP? Motion to Dismiss, and Amended Rule 91a Motion to Dismiss (collectively, the “Motions”). The Court, having considered the Motions, responses, replies, pleadings, arguments of counsel, and law, is of the opinion that the Motions should be GRANTED. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants” Original Chapter 27 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, due to Defendants’ Original Chapter 27 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff Recovery Funding Service LLC, as assignee of Hatton W. Sumners Foundation for the Stud},r and Teaching of the Science of Self-Government, lnc. di’b/a Sumners ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND A‘WARDING FEES PAGE I Foundation’s claims against Defendants James Amos, Jr., Stephen A. Batman, Reagan Stewart, and Michael L. Whalen are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Recovery Funding Service LLC, as assignee ofHatton W. Sumners Foundation for the Study and Teaching ofthe Science of Self-Government, inc. d/b/a Sumners Foundation’s must pay Defendants” reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and costs incurred through the filing and prosecution of its Original Chapter 27 Anti—SLAPP Motion to Dismiss the amount of$49,141.80. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Del’endants‘ Amended Chapter 27 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, due to Defendants’ Amended Chapter 27 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff Recovery Funding Service LLC, as assignee of Hatton W. Sumners Foundation for the Study and Teaching of the Science of Self-Government, Inc. d/b/a Sumners Foundation’s claims against Defendants James Amos, J11, Stephen A. Batman, Reagan Stewart, and Michael L. Whalen are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Recovery Funding Service LLC, as assignee of Hatton W. Sumners Foundation for the Study and Teaching ofthe Science of Self—Government, Inc. d/b/a Sumners Foundation’s must pay Defendants’ reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and costs incurred through the filing and prosecution of its Amended Chapter 27 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss (separate from the fees incurred through the Original Chapter 27 Anti-SLAP? Motion to Dismiss) the amount of$18,651.l2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Amended Rule 91a Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ . MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND A\VARDING FEES PAGE 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, due to Defendants’ Amended Rule 9la Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff Recovery Funding Service LLC, as assignee of Hatton W. Sumners Foundation for the Study and Teaching of the Science of Self—Government, inc. d/b/a Sumners Foundation’s claims against Defendants James Amos, Jr., Stephen A. Batman, Reagan Stewart, and Michael I... Whalen are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Recovery Funding Service LLC, as assignee of Hatton W. Sumners Foundation for the Study and Teaching ofthe Science ofSelf—Government, Inc. d/b/a Sumners Foundation’s must pay Defendants’ reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and costs incurred through the filing and prosecution of its Amended Rule 91a Motion to Dismiss the amount of $45, 95.28. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that additional reasonable attorneys’ fees should be awarded in the following principal amounts under the following conditions: $10,000.00 in the event a motion for new trial is filed and denied; in the event of an unsuccessful appeal 351100000. to the Court of Appeals; an additional $20,000.00 in the event a petition for review is filed with the Texas Supreme Court and denied; and an additional $25,000.00 in the event the petition for review is granted by the Texas Supreme Court, or briefs on the merits are requested, and this Order is upheld, for which let execution issue. It is further IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all relief requested by any party to this action not expressly granted herein1s DENIED. SIGNEDthisthe lg dig/Dim, 2022. UlhllMW/l/l/ \hllnfll/li JUDGEV MOORE HONORABLE ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND AW’ARDINC FEES PAGE 3