arrow left
arrow right
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • JOSEPH  HENSLEY   vs.  XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE LLC , et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED 2/17/2023 9:46 AM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK DALLAS CO., TEXAS Brandon Keys DEPUTY CAUSE NO. DC-22-04072 Joseph Hensley, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintifi’, g V. g DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS XPO Logistics Drayage, LLC and g Madecael Rodriguez; § Defendants. g 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS XPO LOGISTICS DRAYAGE, LLC AND MADECAEL RODRIGUEZ’S APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF SCIRE FACIAS Plaintiff Joseph Hensley (“Plaintiff”) requests that this Court deny Defendants XPO Logistics Drayage, LLC (“XPO”) and Madecael Rodriguez (“Defendants”)’ Application for Writ of Scire Facias, or alternatively abate said application, because the appointment of an estate representative is well under way. Plaintiffs’ surviving spouse is working to file an application to Determine Heirship and for Letters of Administration and the court’s appointment of an ad litem is pending. I. BACKGROUND This lawsuit arises from the serious personal injuries suffered by Plaintiff as a result of a motor vehicle accident on March 8, 2022, wherein Defendant Rodriguez, operating an XTO vehicle, violently rear-ended Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed suit in this Court on April 14, 2022, bringing claims for negligence, negligence per se, and gross negligence against Defendants. However, Plaintiff died unexpectedly in November, 2022. Plaintiff’ s counsel notified the court and requested a 120-day continuance of all setting to sort out complications associated with Plaintiff’s death. The Court granted the Motion and set this case for trial on August 9, 2023. Since that time, Plaintiff’s counsel has diligently attended to his estate affairs. An Application to Determine Heirship and for Letters of Administration is pending. The parties are waiting on action from the probate court; an ad litem has yet to be appointed and no hearing has been set by the court. Plaintiffs’ surviving spouse has also had difficulty locating some of Plaintiffs’ adult children to receive their signatures. II. THE COURT SHOULD DENY THE APPLICATION Rule 151 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that if a plaintiff in a lawsuit dies, the heirs or the administrator or executor may appear in the lawsuit, and after filing a suggestion of death, may be substituted. Tex. R. Civ. P. 151. The defendant may only seek the issuance of scire facias requiring the heirs or administrator or executor to appear and prosecute the suit if a “reasonable time” has passed and no heirs or the administrator or executor has appeared and filed a suggestion of death. Id. A reasonable time has not passed here. An Application to Determine Heirship and for Letters of Administration has been filed. See Ex. A. But the parties are waiting on action from the probate court who has yet to appoint an ad litem or set the matter for hearing. Plaintiffs’ counsel has been diligent, but reasonably requires more time to complete the necessary probate tasks. Plaintiff submits that, upon the agreement of opposing counsel, discovery can proceed in due course while the appointment of Mrs. Hensley as administrator of Plaintiff’s estate is pending. III. CONCLUSION For these reasons, the Court should deny Defendants’ application or alternately abate any decision until an estate administrator can be established. Respectfully submitted, ARNOLD & ITKIN LLP /s/ Cassidv Viser Jason A. Itkin Texas State Bar No. 24032461 Caj Boatright Texas State Bar No. 24036237 Roland Christensen Texas State Bar No. 24101222 Cassidy Viser Texas State Bar No. 24130233 6009 Memorial Drive Houston, Texas 77007 Telephone: (713) 222-3 800 Facsimile: (713) 222—3850 iitkin@ArnoldItkin.com cboatright@ArnoldItkin.com rchristensen@AmoldItkin.com cviser@AmoldItkin.com eserVice@ArnoldItkin.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was forwarded to all counsel of record pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure on this 17th day of February 2023. /s/ Cassidy Viser Cassidy Viser Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Michelle Guillory on behalf of Cassidy Viser Bar No. 24130233 mguillory@arnolditkin.com Envelope ID: 72864061 Status as of 2/17/2023 10:16 AM CST Associated Case Party: JOSEPH HENSLEY Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Jason ltkin e-service@arnolditkin.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT Michelle Guillory mguillory@arnolditkin.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT Shanelle Stevenson sstevenson@arnolditkin.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT Cassidy Viser cviser@arnolditkin.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Mark S.Scudder mscudder@qs|wm.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT Kim Price kprice@qslwm.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT Ryan Funderburg rfunderburg@qslwm.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT Clayton Fitzgerald cfitzgerald@qslwm.com 2/17/2023 9:46:41 AM SENT