arrow left
arrow right
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
  • AA Sharp Investments, LTD, ET AL v. Eugene W. WalckReal Property - Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. AA SHARP INVESTMENTS, LTD, ET AL IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS EUGENE W. WALCK Defendant JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COME NOW, Plaintiffs, AA Sharp Investments, LTD Sheila A. Hurley Sechser, Linda Hurley Dotson, John H. Thompson Trust, Terrence Logue, William Logue, Robert Logue, Loren H. Willford Revocable Trust, Bruce Willford Family Trust, Jeffrey Martinov, Gene T. Oglesby, Paul Leonhart, Jalyne Leonhart, Kim Williams, James Williams, Susan Carney, Joseph C. Hoy, Kathleen Hoy Gass, Mary Ellen Hoy, Paul J. Hoy, Thomas J. Hoy, William E. Hoy, Richard J. Laube, Thomas Patrick Brey, Michael Thomas Brey, the Gene De Santis Living Trust Michelle Phelan, Deborah Jones, Jeanne Stokes, Richard Enright, James Hurley, Mary Kay Mahler, Dennis Hurley, HCCM, LLC, Terra Alma Investments, Ltd., Texica Holdings, LLC., Dennis C. Cory, Michele Marie Hurley Corrigan, Stephanie Sue Hazelton, Robert Lee Woods, IIl., Jade Megan Woods, Linda K. Cory, Diane M. Cory, Kevin P. Cory, Karen S. Field, Denice A. Schrock, John C. Hurley, Jr., Steven P. Hurley, and Diane E. Hurley complaining of Defendant Eugene W. Walck, Sr. would respectfully show the Court the following: |. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN This case should proceed as a Level 2 case pursuant to the Texas Rules of \Jacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx Civil Procedure. Il. PARTIES 2 PlaintiffAA Sharp Investments, LTD is the owner of a collective undivided 50% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 3 Plaintiff Sheila A. Hurley Sechser is the owner of a collective undivided 1.66% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 4 Plaintiff Linda Hurley Dotson is the owner of a collective undivided 1.66% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 5 Plaintiff John H. Thompson Trust is the owner of a collective undivided 1.66% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 6 Plaintiff Terrence Logue is the owner of a collective undivided .50% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 7 Plaintiff William Logue is the owner of a collective undivided .50% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 8 Plaintiff Robert Logue is the owner of a collective undivided .50% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, 2 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx Texas. 9 Plaintiff the Loren H. Willford Revocable Trust is the owner of a collective undivided .75% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 10. Plaintiff the Bruce Willford Family Trust is the owner of a collective undivided .75% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 11. Plaintiff Jeffrey Martinov is the owner of a collective undivided .75% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 12. Plaintiff Gene T. Oglesby is the owner of a collective undivided .75% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 13. Plaintiff Paul Leonhart is the owner of a collective undivided .39% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 14. Plaintiff Jalyne Leonhart is the owner of a collective undivided .39% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 15. Plaintiff Kim Williams is the owner of a collective undivided .39% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 16. Plaintiff James Williams is the owner of a collective undivided .39% interest in 3 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 17. Plaintiff Susan Carney is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 18. Plaintiff Joseph C. Hoy is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 19. Plaintiff Kathleen Hoy Gass is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 20. Plaintiff Mary Ellen Hoy is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 21. Plaintiff Paul J. Hoy is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 22. Plaintiff Thomas J. Hoy is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 23. Plaintiff William E. Hoy is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 4 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx 24. Plaintiff Richard J. Laube is the owner of a collective undivided .27% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 25. Plaintiff Thomas Patrick Brey is the owner of a collective undivided .30% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 26. Plaintiff Michael Thomas Brey is the owner of a collective undivided .30% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 27. Plaintiff the Gene De Santis Living Trust is the owner of a collective undivided .60% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 28. Plaintiff Michelle Phelan is the owner of a collective undivided .30% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 29. Plaintiff Deborah Jones is the owner of a collective undivided .30% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 30. Plaintiff Jeanne Stokes is the owner of a collective undivided .30% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 31. Plaintiff Richard Enright is the owner of a collective undivided .30% interest in 5 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 32. Plaintiff James Hurley is the owner of a collective undivided .50% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 33. Plaintiff Mary Kay Mahler is the owner of a collective undivided .33% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 34. Plaintiff Dennis Hurley is the owner of a collective undivided .50% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 35. Plaintiff HCCM, LLC is the owner of a collective undivided 14.97% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 36. Plaintiff Terra Alma Investments, Ltd. is the owner of a collective undivided 14.72% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 37. Plaintiff Texica Holdings, LLC. is the owner of a collective undivided .25% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 38. Plaintiff Dennis C. Cory is the owner of a collective undivided .40% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, 6 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx Texas. 39. Plaintiff Michele Marie Hurley Corrigan is the owner of a collective undivided .02% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 40. Plaintiff Stephanie Sue Hazelton is the owner of a collective undivided .02% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 41. Plaintiff Robert Lee Woods, Ill. is the owner of a collective undivided .02% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 42. Plaintiff Jade Megan Woods is the owner of a collective undivided .02% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 43. Plaintiff Linda K. Cory is the owner of a collective undivided .40% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 44. Plaintiff Diane M. Cory is the owner of a collective undivided .40% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 45. Plaintiff Kevin P. Cory is the owner of a collective undivided .10% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 7 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx 46. Plaintiff Karen S. Field is the owner of a collective undivided .40% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 47. Plaintiff Denice A. Schrock is the owner of a collective undivided .33% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 48. Plaintiff John C. Hurley, Jr. is the owner of a collective undivided .33% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 49. Plaintiff Steven P. Hurley is the owner of a collective undivided .33% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 50. Plaintiff Diane E. Hurley is the owner of a collective undivided .33% interest in the real property that is the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 51. Defendant Eugene W. Walck, Sr. is the owner of a collective undivided 1.3889000% interest in the real property that is the subject to this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. Defendant Walck can be served at his home at Saratoga, WY 82331 or wherever he may be found. Plaintiffs request that service of process by issued. Ill. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 52. Venue is proper in Fort Bend County, Texas pursuant to §15.011 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code as that is the county in which the property is located. 8 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx 53. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 23.002 of the Texas Property Code as this is a suit to partition the subject real property. In addition, the value of the real property as a whole is in excess of $100,000.00 and the non-monetary relief sought is the partitioned property, and thus, within the jurisdictional limits of the court. IV. FACTS 54. Plaintiffs and Defendant are co-owners of the real property in a certain parcel of real property situated in Fort Bend County, Texas described as 0082 C D SAYRE TRACT 4, Reference No. R38822 (hereinafter the “Property”). The Property consists of approximately 980 acres that is specifically identified on the Sayre Survey attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The Property is further described more specifically in the attached Special Warranty Deed, previously recorded in Fort Bend County, Texas in 1968. Exhibit 2. Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s co-ownership of the Property results from inheritance and succession from those owners identified in the Special Warranty Deed date 1968. V. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION 55. Based upon the facts set forth herein, Plaintiffs sue Defendant for Declaratory Judgment to declare legal title of the of the subject property. Jointly, Plaintiffs maintain 98.6111% interest in the Property. Defendant’s portion of the approximate 980 acres is 1.3889000%. Each Plaintiff should be judicially declared to be an individual who is the owner of their respective collective undivided interest in the real property the subject of this lawsuit which is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. 56. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiffs are entitled to bring this suit to determine the relative ownership and rights of the parties in and to the property. Plaintiffs seek 9 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx Declaratory Judgment to determine such interest and rights. VI. PARTITION 57. Plaintiffs seek partition of the Property as between all Plaintiffs and Defendant. Jointly, Plaintiffs maintain 98.6111% interest in the Property. Defendant's portion of the approximate 980 acres is 1.3889000%. Plaintiffs estimate the value of the undivided tract to be approximately $2,000,000.00. The property can easily be partitioned and provide Defendant a fair and equitable division. A. Appointment of Commissioners 58. Plaintiffs request that pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 761, the Court appoint three (3) commissioners, that are competent and disinterested, to prepare a report as to how the Property should be divided. B. Appointment of Surveyor 59. No appointment of a surveyor is requested at this time. Plaintiffs are engaging the services of a surveyor and will provide same to the Commissioners once appointed. c. Appointment of Appraiser 60. Currently, the appointment of an appraiser is not necessary. Plaintiffs engaging the services of an appraiser. Plaintiffs will have paid for that appraisal and will provide same to the Commissioners once appointed. D. Proposed Partition 61. Plaintiffs request that defendant Eugene W. Walck, Sr.’s interest of 1.388900% be partitioned as follows: approximate 10.00 acres as depicted on the attached survey, Ex. 1. 10 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx VIL RULE 193.7 NOTICE 62. Plaintiffs hereby give notice that all documents produced in this lawsuit are intended to be used against Defendant in the lawsuit including through the trial of the matter. Vill, ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS OF COURT 63. It was necessary for the Plaintiffs to hire legal counsel to seek partition of the Property. Plaintiffs hired Charles J. Jacobus and K. Annette Disch and have incurred reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and expenses in conjunction with the Partition. Pursuant to Section 37.009 and 42.001 of the Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, and Section 23.001 of the Texas Property Code Plaintiffs are entitled to recover their reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and costs associated with this partition action. Plaintiff request attorney's fees and cost of Court be assessed against Defendant as allowed by law through trial and appeal, IX. PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs prays that Defendant, be cited to appear and answer herein, and, that the Property be partitioned; that Defendant's 1.3889000% interest in the Property be partitioned; that Plaintiffs recover their expenses, attorney’s fees, costs, as well as pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest; and, any and all other such and further relief to which Plaintiff may be entitled. 11 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx Respectfully submitted, GAUNTT, KOEN, BINNEY& KIDD, LLP. K. Annette Disch State Bar No. 00785822 25700 I-45 North, Ste 130 Spring, TX 773880 281.367.6555 281.367.3705 Facsimile Annette.disch@gkbklaw.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF By: /s/ Charles J. Jacobus Charles J. Jacobus State Bar No. 10528700 6750 West Loop South, Suite 615 Bellaire, Texas 77401 713.839-8800 ext.1 Jacobusbellaire@aol.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 12 X:\KADWacobus Work\Partition - Snell\Plaintiffs' Original Petition.docx 0, «oe a2D D> XH T1 “ee > tn s ei“us ists an oy SAO xe % ye 2 e ro Nat ve A ty So eta Ar he “8 & o oN. YS,Shs oS S een gf Sy Xa sah ARE "A & Sos Se \ Ziss. its ". eece e reee &as s anhe, "5, \, OT as Ve 4 a 7 Be % 0 ” o> ”y Pe Koes x %, 3) DS Yc wf QP 22 aa3 en ~\~ ” 2 in 2,0 $8@ ° ° X ” Few %% ae YE we ” S8NSa eeas one ‘tyHe ays Len wy aS “= Roofs Bosas y3 % xX ”” os S y OX a9 SS Qa5 a's » Mi, Ny Yy ag SoD LSS<8) gl v a Ky oe We 710 Se 2 Pe, Rp #5 Kife 7X ‘NY \s “ OMe y aA 0%, “, 8, a ie , ——_—~F oe 4s \ 3 eA 2 *S 3P BM oe % ay ° woe Ais is eto os se ° = =f, es oe ,sae Ke esMop, oe,ne, ny“aS NN ot 3 ORSen ~ 7 of phyi % se Se Ki KX A 3) SetKs if ae,as,a @ oy 2met = ye ” oes oo aa Aats & SD) fs, &At 2s, ‘ sate Ss “ae zs, a Be ien> sods, (a as Oe fe, ee S< ey? ~ POS ses 32 frank bert \ et NGSee #Ss 23gs RGge Sigh al = i\2 $33 $32 - 7040 Pe <, ef i Bly Ps3s 83? ae SE 3), ook Ke AP borg 3 gt 32 gf dea s 2a Bele Bae [sh Sot Sn ast ot “s 8 508? 085 8 ofus ~ Ag 2 isl ese stsire Se=S ae ese, 1g! \ Be ” 09 S$ er e ef Pa i! if ne bn ne e Rcherenite, ge pe Al“al [ — —~ a soso o m2 7 ptet weit A Te ‘ul W635] SlEx 3r A Ns gN ik ¥a Bee ao ot wy Ss io WINSS af,ue a 3 04) QaG Sah 8 <5 iSgar | Poi eo Sng sos ae ipsa 218 ORs oo Qe #§32 ofl ‘al | fis, 33 Pe 3o = Sp S05 oe] S| WEym Ze/SaeT one A apy Bris 26 PEN 3 ay Nai i fi f& 8\ oy 8 is ee ay 33isles 338 esihe 3 Sy a2 <9 Go =p & ee zl 53 we % wD 32a Bob