On January 18, 2023 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
for Default Judgment
in the District Court of Chisago County.
Preview
13-CV-23-55
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF CHISAGO TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Fairview Health Services, Court File No:
Case Type: Default Judgment
Plaintiff, Judge:
v. ORDER
Daniel G Schultz,
Defendant.
The above-entitled matter came before the Court, in chambers, upon Plaintiff’s request for
Default Judgment.
The Court, based upon its entire file and the Affidavit submitted by Plaintiff, makes the
following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff served a Summons and Complaint upon Defendant on or about December 9, 2022
to which Defendant has not interposed an Answer.
2. Plaintiff has now filed the original Summons and Complaint and Affidavit of Service with
the Court.
3. Plaintiff has now filed its Affidavit of No Answer with the Court.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Defendant has failed to Answer or otherwise appear in this action, and Plaintiff is entitled
to Default Judgment pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 55.01(a).
2. Plaintiff is entitled to Default Judgment against Defendant for the amount sought in its
Affidavit of No Answer.
1
13-CV-23-55
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
1. Plaintiff shall have Judgment against Defendant in the amount of $2,560.39, per its
Affidavit of No Answer, which includes Plaintiff’s costs herein.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: __________________, 2023 BY THE COURT
______________________________
Judge of District Court
2
Document Filed Date
January 18, 2023
Case Filing Date
January 18, 2023
Category
Default Judgment
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
13-CV-23-55 STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF CHISAGO TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Fairview Health Services, Court File No: Case Type: Default Judgment Plaintiff, Judge: v. ORDER Daniel G Schultz, Defendant. The above-entitled matter came before the Court, in chambers, upon Plaintiff’s request for Default Judgment. The Court, based upon its entire file and the Affidavit submitted by Plaintiff, makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Plaintiff served a Summons and Complaint upon Defendant on or about December 9, 2022 to which Defendant has not interposed an Answer. 2. Plaintiff has now filed the original Summons and Complaint and Affidavit of Service with the Court. 3. Plaintiff has now filed its Affidavit of No Answer with the Court. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Defendant has failed to Answer or otherwise appear in this action, and Plaintiff is entitled to Default Judgment pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 55.01(a). 2. Plaintiff is entitled to Default Judgment against Defendant for the amount sought in its Affidavit of No Answer. 1 13-CV-23-55 ORDER FOR JUDGMENT 1. Plaintiff shall have Judgment against Defendant in the amount of $2,560.39, per its Affidavit of No Answer, which includes Plaintiff’s costs herein. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: __________________, 2023 BY THE COURT ______________________________ Judge of District Court 2