On March 20, 2014 a
NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT SIMON LAVI, D.O.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SPECIALLY SET A HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY TO CONTINUE TRIAL
was filed
involving a dispute between
Houlihan Brent,
and
Does 1-100,
Kolpin Edward C. D.O,
Koplin Edward C. D.O.,
Lavi Simon D.O.,
Lavi Simon. D.O,
Southe California Hospital Of Culver City,
Southern California Healthcare System Inc,
Southern California Hospital At Culver,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Be
e
George E. Peterson, Esq., Bar No.: 054310
Sherry M. Gregorio, Esq., Bar No.: 263856
Kyle Maland, Esq., Bar No. 292210
PETERSON - BRADFORD « BURKWITZ
100 North First Street, Suite 300
Burbank, California 91502
818.562.5800 FILED
Sup enor Court of Caliicmia
Attorneys for Defendant ounty of Los Angeles
SIMON LAVI, D.O.
JUN 80 2017
Sherri Carter, Exgouive Ulicor/Clerk
oa
By_\s.% ye
Rau! Sanchez
eputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
14
BRENT HOULIHAN, Case No.: BC606185
12 Assigned to the Honorable: HON. ROBERT B.
Ze
Plaintiff, BROADBELT, DEPT. 93
ESa
13
Z2s
SS vs. NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT SIMON
Ba 14 LAVI, D.0.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO
S26
Zs
OSES
essSn SIMON LAVI, D.O.; EDWARD C. KOLPIN, D.O.; SPECIALLY SET A HEARING DATE FOR MOTION
faz38 15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL OF CULVER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR
2OS
ze CITY and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ALTERNATIVELY TO CONTINUE TRIAL
z5s
seem 16
se Defendants. Date: June 29, 2017
use 17 Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept: 93
18
19 Complaint Filed: January 5, 2016
Trial Date: March 20, 2018
20
21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant SIMON LAVI, D.0.’s ex parte application to specially set a
23 hearing date for a motion for summary judgment or alternatively to continue trial came on for hearing on
24 Thursday, June 29, 2017, at 8:30 a.m., in Department 93 of the above-entitled court. The Court ruled as
25 follows:
26 1 The ex parte application to specially set a hearing date for a motion for summary judgment
2 27 was denied;
3 28 2. Alternatively, defendant's ex parte application to continue trial was granted based on good
w
1
bad
2 NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT SIMON LAVI, D.O,’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SPECIALLY SET A HEARING
ho DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY TO CONTINUE TRIAL
‘fles\1814-houlihan (cap)ipleadings\p-nte ruling ex parte. docx
Document Filed Date
June 30, 2017
Case Filing Date
March 20, 2014
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Be e George E. Peterson, Esq., Bar No.: 054310 Sherry M. Gregorio, Esq., Bar No.: 263856 Kyle Maland, Esq., Bar No. 292210 PETERSON - BRADFORD « BURKWITZ 100 North First Street, Suite 300 Burbank, California 91502 818.562.5800 FILED Sup enor Court of Caliicmia Attorneys for Defendant ounty of Los Angeles SIMON LAVI, D.O. JUN 80 2017 Sherri Carter, Exgouive Ulicor/Clerk oa By_\s.% ye Rau! Sanchez eputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 14 BRENT HOULIHAN, Case No.: BC606185 12 Assigned to the Honorable: HON. ROBERT B. Ze Plaintiff, BROADBELT, DEPT. 93 ESa 13 Z2s SS vs. NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT SIMON Ba 14 LAVI, D.0.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO S26 Zs OSES essSn SIMON LAVI, D.O.; EDWARD C. KOLPIN, D.O.; SPECIALLY SET A HEARING DATE FOR MOTION faz38 15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL OF CULVER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR 2OS ze CITY and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ALTERNATIVELY TO CONTINUE TRIAL z5s seem 16 se Defendants. Date: June 29, 2017 use 17 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: 93 18 19 Complaint Filed: January 5, 2016 Trial Date: March 20, 2018 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant SIMON LAVI, D.0.’s ex parte application to specially set a 23 hearing date for a motion for summary judgment or alternatively to continue trial came on for hearing on 24 Thursday, June 29, 2017, at 8:30 a.m., in Department 93 of the above-entitled court. The Court ruled as 25 follows: 26 1 The ex parte application to specially set a hearing date for a motion for summary judgment 2 27 was denied; 3 28 2. Alternatively, defendant's ex parte application to continue trial was granted based on good w 1 bad 2 NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT SIMON LAVI, D.O,’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SPECIALLY SET A HEARING ho DATE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY TO CONTINUE TRIAL ‘fles\1814-houlihan (cap)ipleadings\p-nte ruling ex parte. docx