arrow left
arrow right
  • GOLDEN WEST FOOD GROUP INC ET AL VS THOMAS P NAU ET AL Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • GOLDEN WEST FOOD GROUP INC ET AL VS THOMAS P NAU ET AL Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

e Scott Thomas Green, SBN 82220 - Stephen M. Sanders, SBN 242039 nw + Daniel J. Spurgeon, SBN 265915 Ronald J. Skocypec, P.E., Of Counsel, SBN 72690 THE GREEN LAW GROUP, LLP , 1777 E. Los Angeles Avenue FILE Superior Court of California Simi Valley, California 93065 ounty of Los Angeles Tel: (805) 306-1100; Fax: (805) 306-1300 Scott@thegreenlawgroup.com. SEP 28. 2016 Stephen@thegreenlawgroup.com Daniel@thegreenlawgroup.com Ree Carter, Exacutive Officer/Cletk et Sh eri Ron@thegreenlawgroup.com -By. Deput} Raul Sanchez Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant GOLDEN WEST FOOD GROUP, INC. and Plaintiff COLD GROUP, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES-UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 11 12 GOLDEN WEST FOOD GROUP, INC., a _) Case No.: BC555147 13 California corporation and COLD GROUP ) INC., a California corporation, doing ) PLAINTIFF COLD GROUP, INC.'S 14 business as SUPER COOL Refrigeration, ) COMPENDIUM OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO RAE 15 Plaintiffs, CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST vs. PLAINTIFFS; EXHIBITS 1-20 16 17 THOMAS P. NAU et al., Hearing Date: October 12, 2016 Time: 730 a.m. Defendants. Dept: 15 18 RESERVATION ID: 160715143800 19 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. Assigned to: Hon. Richard L. Fruin, Jr. 20 Department: 15 Complaint filed: August 19, 2014 21 Trial Date: March 6, 2017 22 FSC Date: February 24, 2017 23 4 TO: ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: : 25 Pursuant to California Rules of Court, 1350, subd. (g), Plaintiff Cold Group, Inc. we hereby submits its compendium of exhibits in support of its motion for summary 27 adjudication against RAE Corporation on the eleventh cause of action of the fourth 28 amended complaint: 1 PLAINTIFFS’ COMPENDIUM OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO RAE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST PLAINTIFFS