arrow left
arrow right
  • MELISSA MICHELLE ALMEIDA ET AL VS GEN TORRANCE LLC Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MELISSA MICHELLE ALMEIDA ET AL VS GEN TORRANCE LLC Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Bm .= ® Kevin A. Lipeles (Bar No. 244275) Supertor Court Of California Thomas H. Schelly (Bar No. 217285) ‘County Of Los Angeles LIPELES LAW GROUP, APC 880 Apollo Street, Suite 336 JUN 19 2017 El Segundo, California 90245 Sh err RC} r, Executive Officer/Clerk Telephone: (310) 322-2211 Fax: (310) 322-2252 Deputy By. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BY FAX MELISSA MICHELLE ALMEIDA, et al, CASE NO.: BC576265 [Hon. Ernest M. Hiroshige] 10 Plaintiffs, vs. PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO 11 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY GEN TORRANCE, LLC, California limited FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 2 liability company; and DOES 1 through 13 100, inclusive, Hearing Date: June 29, 2017 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. 14 Defendants. Dept.: 54 15 Complaint Filed: March 20, 2015 16 Trial Date: None set 7 18 I INTRODUCTION 19 Defendant has the facts wrong and, with respect to this case, it has the law wrong. 20 Plaintiffs’ counse] did not stipulate or otherwise agree to stay the entire lawsuit and, despite the similarity between the plaintiffs’ respective claims, there are no overlapping issues such that 21 the entire action should be stayed. 22 For those plaintiffs that executed an arbitration agreement with the defendant, this action is stayed as per the parties’ stipulation; however as for those plaintiffs that did not sign 24 an arbitration agreement with the defendant — there are three — this action should NOT be 25 stayed and this action should proceed on its merits in Los Angeles County Superior Court. 27 28 od OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION