arrow left
arrow right
  • RUBEN GONZALEZ ET AL VS GEORGE WILSON ET AL Intentional PI/PD/WD (eg. assault) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • RUBEN GONZALEZ ET AL VS GEORGE WILSON ET AL Intentional PI/PD/WD (eg. assault) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

12/16/2016 13:33 Ivie, McNeil & Mya‘. FA, P.011/020 Byron M. Purcell, Esq. (#176410) Marie B. Maurice, Esq. (#258069) IVIE, McNEILL & WYATT A Professional Law Corporation FILED 444 S, Flower Street, Suite 1800 Los Angeles, California 90071 Souinty Court of Califomia of Los Angeles (213) 489-0028 / (213) 489-0552 Fax DEC 19 2016 E-mail: bpurcell@imwlaw.com Sherri R. . Cartes, Executive OfticeriClerk mmaurice@imwlaw.com plikDebraCa Attorneys for Plaintiffs, By, hn Roberson ———. Deputy RUBEN GONZALEZ and ALICE GONZALEZ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - UNLIMITED 1 WEST DISTRICT 12 RUBEN GONZALEZ and CASE NO.; BC570815 13 ALICE GONZALEZ {Complaint filed 1/29/15; Dept. R; Trial Date 9/8/16] 14 Plaintiffs, 15 PLAINTIFF RUBEN GONZALEZ’S vs, REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION 16 TO MOTION TO RECOVER COST OF GEORGE WILSON dba LA SHOE REPAIR & PROOF SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO 17 LUGGAGE; JUDY WILSON dba LA SHOE C.CLP, § 2033.420 18 REPAIR & LUGGAGE; LA SHOE REPAIR & LUGGAGE, business entity unknown; and Date: December 23, 2016 19 DOES 1-50; inclusive, Time: 9:00: a.m. par R 20 | 21; Defendants. ) 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: 23 Plaintiff RUBEN GONZALEZ hereby submits his Reply to Defendants’ Opposition to 25 Plaintiff's Motion to Recover Cost of Proof Sanctions Pursuant to C.C.P. §2033.420 as follows: 26 1] 27 28 Mf PLAINTIFF RUBEN GONZALEZ’S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO RECOVER COST OF PROOF SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.CP. § 2033.420- 1 13:35:19 2016-12-16