On April 10, 2015 a
DEFENDANT INNOVATIVE CARE?MANACEMENT, INC'S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS IN OPPOSITION TO INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTIO
was filed
involving a dispute between
90210 Surgery Medical Center Llc,
Lanman Todd M.D.,
and
Cigna Inc.,
Innovative Care Management Inc.,
Pacific Maritime Association,
Tc3 Health Inc.,
Zenith American Solutions Inc.,
for Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
PRINDLE, GOETZ, BARNES & REINHOLTZ LLP
Jack R. Reinholtz, Esq. (Bar No. 149884)
Cynthia A. Palin, Esq. (Bar No. 143486) FILED
Superior Court of California
310 Golden Shore, Fourth Floor
County af nc Anaeles
Long Beach, California 90802
Telephone: (562) 436-3946
Facsimile: (562) 495-0564 APR 16 2018
jreinholtz@prindlelaw.com Sherri. Ca Ce Utticer/Clerk of Cour
cpalin@prindlelaw.com
IRON 1004 By. TDenuty}
Raul Sanche-
Attorneys for Defendant,
INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
10
14 TODD LANMAN, M.D., CASE NO. BC578420
% (Consolidated with 90210 Surgery Medical Center,
12 Plaintiff, LLC v. Pacific Maritime Association, Case No.
BC578421)
13 V. (Case assigned to Judge Susan Bryant-Deason -
Dept. 52)
14 PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATON, in its
capacity as Trustee of the Coastwise Indemnity DEFENDANT INNOVATIVE CARE
15 Plan; ZENFFH AMERICAN SOLUTIONS; - I-MANAGEMENT, ING2S-OBJECTIONS.TO.. -
INC., a corporation; TC3 HEALTH, INC., a EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS IN
16 corporation; INNOVATIVE CARE OPPOSITION TO INNOVATIVE CARE
MANAGMENT, INC, a corporation; CIGNA, MANAGEMENT, INC.’S MOTION FOR
z 7 INC., a corporation and DOES 1 through 100, SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
inclusive ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY
18 ADJUDICATION
Defendants.
19 (CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE
3.1354)
20
fo
Reservation No. 171206272290
Hearing Date: April 27, 2018
Time: 8:30 a.m,
22 Dept.: 52
Y
O 24
25
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
April 10, 2015
May 16, 2018
26
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN,
27
28 Intervenor Plaintiff,
1
1CM’S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ EVIDENCE
9G2IONICM MSI Reolv Objection woEvidence
Category
Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 06/14/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
PRINDLE, GOETZ, BARNES & REINHOLTZ LLP Jack R. Reinholtz, Esq. (Bar No. 149884) Cynthia A. Palin, Esq. (Bar No. 143486) FILED Superior Court of California 310 Golden Shore, Fourth Floor County af nc Anaeles Long Beach, California 90802 Telephone: (562) 436-3946 Facsimile: (562) 495-0564 APR 16 2018 jreinholtz@prindlelaw.com Sherri. Ca Ce Utticer/Clerk of Cour cpalin@prindlelaw.com IRON 1004 By. TDenuty} Raul Sanche- Attorneys for Defendant, INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 14 TODD LANMAN, M.D., CASE NO. BC578420 % (Consolidated with 90210 Surgery Medical Center, 12 Plaintiff, LLC v. Pacific Maritime Association, Case No. BC578421) 13 V. (Case assigned to Judge Susan Bryant-Deason - Dept. 52) 14 PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATON, in its capacity as Trustee of the Coastwise Indemnity DEFENDANT INNOVATIVE CARE 15 Plan; ZENFFH AMERICAN SOLUTIONS; - I-MANAGEMENT, ING2S-OBJECTIONS.TO.. - INC., a corporation; TC3 HEALTH, INC., a EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS IN 16 corporation; INNOVATIVE CARE OPPOSITION TO INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGMENT, INC, a corporation; CIGNA, MANAGEMENT, INC.’S MOTION FOR z 7 INC., a corporation and DOES 1 through 100, SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE inclusive ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY 18 ADJUDICATION Defendants. 19 (CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.1354) 20 fo Reservation No. 171206272290 Hearing Date: April 27, 2018 Time: 8:30 a.m, 22 Dept.: 52 Y O 24 25 Complaint Filed: Trial Date: April 10, 2015 May 16, 2018 26 ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, 27 28 Intervenor Plaintiff, 1 1CM’S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ EVIDENCE 9G2IONICM MSI Reolv Objection woEvidence