On April 10, 2015 a
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
was filed
involving a dispute between
90210 Surgery Medical Center Llc ,
Lanman Todd M.D. ,
and
Cigna Inc. ,
Innovative Care Management Inc. ,
Pacific Maritime Association ,
Tc3 Health Inc. ,
Zenith American Solutions Inc. ,
for Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
a
@ ORIGINAL ®@
PRINDLE, GOETZ, BARNES & REINHOLTZ LLP
Jack R. Reinholtz, Esq. (Bar No. 149884)
FILED
Suj ior Court of Califomia
Cynthia A. Palin, Esq. (Bar No. 143486) ounty of Los Angétes
310 Golden Shore, Fourth Floor
Long Beach, California 90802 SEP 09 2016
Telephone: (562) 436-3946
Facsimile: (562) 495-0564 Shei miR. Cat
jreinholt: prindlelaw.com By.
cpalin@prindlelaw.com
TRON 1004
Attorneys for Defendant,
INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
11
12 TODD LANMAN, M_D., CASE NO. BCS78420
um
[Related to 90210 Surgery Medical Center, LLC v.
13 Plaintiffs, Pacific Maritime Association, Case No. BC578421]}
14 v (Case assigned to Judge Susan Bryant-Deason —
Dept. 52)
15 PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATON, in its
capacity as Trustee of the Coastwise Indemnity
16 Plan; ZENITH AMERICAN SOLUTIONS, REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
INC., a corporation; TC3 HEALTH, INC., a INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.’S
17 corporation; INNOVATIVE CARE MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF
MANAGMENT, INC, a corporation; CIGNA, PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
18 INC., a corporation and DOES 1 through 100, COMPLAINT
inclusive
19 Reservation No. 160627139213
Defendants. Date: September 13, 2016
20 Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept: 52
21
Complaint Filed: April 10, 2015
22 Trial Date: September 21, 2016
23
@ 24 Defendant, Innovative Care Management, Inc. ("ICM") replies to Plaintiff Todd Lanman,
$25 M_D. ("Lanman") opposition to ICM's Motion to Strike its claim for punitive as plead in Lanman's
Second Amended Complaint ("SAC").
° 97 MI
28 Mf
1
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Judge
Susan Bryant-Deason
Track Judge’s New Case
Document Filed Date
September 02, 2016
Case Filing Date
April 10, 2015
Category
Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 06/14/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
a @ ORIGINAL ®@ PRINDLE, GOETZ, BARNES & REINHOLTZ LLP Jack R. Reinholtz, Esq. (Bar No. 149884) FILED Suj ior Court of Califomia Cynthia A. Palin, Esq. (Bar No. 143486) ounty of Los Angétes 310 Golden Shore, Fourth Floor Long Beach, California 90802 SEP 09 2016 Telephone: (562) 436-3946 Facsimile: (562) 495-0564 Shei miR. Cat jreinholt: prindlelaw.com By. cpalin@prindlelaw.com TRON 1004 Attorneys for Defendant, INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 12 TODD LANMAN, M_D., CASE NO. BCS78420 um [Related to 90210 Surgery Medical Center, LLC v. 13 Plaintiffs, Pacific Maritime Association, Case No. BC578421]} 14 v (Case assigned to Judge Susan Bryant-Deason — Dept. 52) 15 PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATON, in its capacity as Trustee of the Coastwise Indemnity 16 Plan; ZENITH AMERICAN SOLUTIONS, REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT INC., a corporation; TC3 HEALTH, INC., a INNOVATIVE CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.’S 17 corporation; INNOVATIVE CARE MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF MANAGMENT, INC, a corporation; CIGNA, PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 18 INC., a corporation and DOES 1 through 100, COMPLAINT inclusive 19 Reservation No. 160627139213 Defendants. Date: September 13, 2016 20 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: 52 21 Complaint Filed: April 10, 2015 22 Trial Date: September 21, 2016 23 @ 24 Defendant, Innovative Care Management, Inc. ("ICM") replies to Plaintiff Todd Lanman, $25 M_D. ("Lanman") opposition to ICM's Motion to Strike its claim for punitive as plead in Lanman's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). ° 97 MI 28 Mf 1 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT