arrow left
arrow right
  • DAVID BALDERAS VS FERNANDO PEREZ ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DAVID BALDERAS VS FERNANDO PEREZ ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

e POOLE & SHAFFERY, LLP John Shaffery (Bar No. 160119) Superior Court of(California E-Mail: jshaffery@pooleshaffery.com Countyof, Jaion Chung (Bar No. 249772) E-Mail: jchung@pooleshaffery.com 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 JAN 25 2017 Los Angeles, California 90071 Sherri R. Carter, Bx (213) 439-5390 Telephone ti ive Officer/Clerk (213) 439-0183 Facsimile By, ee Deputy Attomeys for Defendant, JOSE FERNANDO PEREZ (erroneously served and sued as “Fernando Perez”) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BY FAX <8 11 Og oc DAVID BALDERAS. Case No. BC579755 a2 o8 12 [Assigned to Hon. Holly J. Fujie, Dept. “98”) ge Gy ss Plaintiff, os 13 DEFENDANT JOSE FERNANDO fg 2 PEREZ’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO oS Se VS. ae 14 EXCLUDE THE ACCIDENT FERNANDO PEREZ, et al INVESTIGATION REPORT PREPARED WSS aan BY PLAINTIFF’S EMPLOYER abd BS ge Defendants. aa 16 Complaint Filed: April 24, 2015 aa Trial Date: February 28, 2017 Ba 17 6 Zz ze 54 oa 18 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD Oe 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, JOSE FERNANDO PEREZ (“Defendant”), will 20 move this Court in limine for an Order precluding Plaintiff, DAVID BALDERAS (“Plaintiff”), his 21 counsel, and his witnesses from introducing or referring to a report entitled “Accident 22 Investigation Report” (the “Report”) prepared by Plaintiff's former employer, Ross Organic 23 Specialty Sales, Inc. (“Ross Organic”) at trial on the grounds that the Report, including its findings 24 and/or investigations, fails to meet the threshold requirement. of being trustworthy and the 25 marginal relevance of the Report is outweighed by extreme prejudice. and the -risk that, such 26 evidence will mislead and confuse the jury and be an unnecessary waste of time ae 27 Mt ee “Oo 28 FiClients2\102213600-BALDERAS v. PEREZ\TRIALIMILIMIL DOR ExelRosRepon. docx . DEFENDANT JOSE FERNANDO PEREZ’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE THE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT PREPARED. BY PLAINTIFF'S EMPLOYER ~ “ aon