arrow left
arrow right
  • LOURDES SANCHEZ VS AUSTIN TAYLOR Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • LOURDES SANCHEZ VS AUSTIN TAYLOR Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

- at e L. Walker Van Antwerp III, SBN 112696 Van Antwerp Law Firm FILED 643 South Olive Street, Suite 220 Los Angeles, California 90014 éo Superior Court of California unty of Los Angeles (213) 688-8545 FEB 06 2017 (213) 784-0767 fax er Reo Sh erri Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk By. Deputy Attomey for Plaintiff Lourdes Sanchez Faut Sanchez SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL CIVIL UNLIMITED - PI 10 11 LOURDES SANCHEZ, CASE NO. BC 567333 12 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN 13 vs. LIMINE #11, TO EXCLUDE SANDBAGGING DAMAGE 14 |AUSTIN TAYLOR, MARY ITRI and DOES 1 TO 10, REQUEST UNTIL REBUTTAL Inclusive, : 15 DATE: February 7, 2017 TIME: 9:30 a.m. 16 Defendants. DEPT: 92 17 Hon. Michelle Williams Court - D 92 18 19 20 I 21 INTRODUCTION 22 Plaintiff does not oppose this request. 2 ne HeYih 23 Date: February 5, 2017 by 24 Walker Van Antwérp (II * tse i 25 Attorney for Plaintiff Lourdes Sanchez 26 27 28 1 PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO MiL #11 - 1* MENTION OF DAMAGES IN REBUTTAL