On November 05, 2015 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Abdul Fatima,
and
Access Services,
Blair Chris,
Does 1 Through 20,
Keolis Transit,
for Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
@
Superto Cour
Of
D Califo
trnia
Joseph S. Farzam, SBN 210817 Cou inty Of Los Angeles
Matthew Evans, SBN 258151
JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM SEP 22 2017
A Professional Law Corporation
11766 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 280 Sheri R. Caner, tive Of
Los Angeles, California 90025 By,
Deputy
Telephone: (310) 226-6890
Fax: (310) 226-6891
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
FATIMAH ABDUL
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
qi
FATIMAH ABDUL, Case No.: BC600040
12
(Unlimited)
13 Plaintiff, Dept. 91
Case filed 11/5/2015
14 vs. FSC 10/5/2017
15 Trial 10/16/2017
ACCESS SERVICES, etc., et al,
16 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
Defendants. DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE
17 NO. 6 TO EXCLUDE MENTION OF
18 DEFENDANT ACCESS SERVICES AS A
COMMON CARRIER
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
wD
WO
eo
wa
Wo
1D PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6 - 1
ve
Document Filed Date
September 22, 2017
Case Filing Date
November 05, 2015
Category
Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Jury Verdict 12/18/2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
@ Superto Cour Of D Califo trnia Joseph S. Farzam, SBN 210817 Cou inty Of Los Angeles Matthew Evans, SBN 258151 JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM SEP 22 2017 A Professional Law Corporation 11766 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 280 Sheri R. Caner, tive Of Los Angeles, California 90025 By, Deputy Telephone: (310) 226-6890 Fax: (310) 226-6891 Attorneys for Plaintiff, FATIMAH ABDUL SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT qi FATIMAH ABDUL, Case No.: BC600040 12 (Unlimited) 13 Plaintiff, Dept. 91 Case filed 11/5/2015 14 vs. FSC 10/5/2017 15 Trial 10/16/2017 ACCESS SERVICES, etc., et al, 16 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO Defendants. DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE 17 NO. 6 TO EXCLUDE MENTION OF 18 DEFENDANT ACCESS SERVICES AS A COMMON CARRIER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 wD WO eo wa Wo 1D PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6 - 1 ve