arrow left
arrow right
  • ISRAA BITAR ET AL VS MUHAMMED ABDELAAL Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ISRAA BITAR ET AL VS MUHAMMED ABDELAAL Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

—,) COURT @ @ CoP LAW OFFICES OF STEVE LARKIN STEVE LARKIN, ESQ. SBN 112934 FILED 2931 12™ Avenue Superior Court of Cal ifornia County of Los Angeles Los Angeles, California 90018 818 984 8544 sl3esq@yahoo.com OCT 17 2016 Sherri R. Garter, Executive Officer/Clerk By.on" oes Attorney for Plaintiff ISRAA BITAR K. Thomas Deputy 10 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT 12 13 14 ISRAA BITAR Case No.: BC586002 15 Plaintiff PLAINTIFF ISRAA BITAR’S OPPOSITION TO EX-PARTE MOTION 16 VS. TO CONTINUE TRIAL 17 MUHAMMED. ABDELAAL DECLARATION OF STEVE LARKIN DECLARATION OF ISRAA BITAR 18 Defendant DECL. OF RENEE SCHWARTZ PH.D 19 DATE: OCTOBER 17. 2016 TIME: 8:30A.M. 20 DEPT: 91 21 JUDGE: Hon. Patricia Nieto 22 COMES NOW PLAINTIFF ISRAA BITAR and files this response to defendant’ 2 ex-parte motion to continue trial of this matter. 24 I= INTRODUCTION 25: This is a personal injury case wherein plaintiffs nose was severely bitten off by defendants’ 26. dog in a backyard pool party. The plaintiff suffered several hospitalizations and two plastic an; ‘4| reconstruetive surgeries. Thereafter she continues to the present day with mental health 28" treatments for the emotional distress, anxiety, fears and nightmares associated with the incident. PLAINTIFF’ S OPPOSITION TO EX-PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL