On December 15, 2015 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Aguayo Abraham,
Dawson Derryck,
Stone Robert,
and
U.S. Security Associates Inc.,
for Other Commercial Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
To: Clerk Los Angtles Superior Court + Page 2 of 21 2020-08-10 17:04:40 (GMT) 18183382533 From: Peter Dion-Kindem
.
FILED
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
PETER R. DION-KINDEM (SBN 95267)
B THE DION-KINDEM LAW FIRM AUG 10 2020
PETER R. DION-KINDEM, P. C. Sherri RK. Curier, executive Officer/
2945 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 Clerk
Westlake Village, CA 91361
By. Deputy
Rita Navarvan
Telephone (818) 883-4900
Email: peter@dion-kindemlaw.com
5
LONNIE C, BLANCHARD, HI (SBN 93530)
THE BLANCHARD LAW Group, APC
11 East Washington Boulevard, No. 2262
Commerce, California 90040
Telephone (213) 599-8255
Fax (213) 402-3949
Email lonnieblanchard@gmail.com
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Stone
It
12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
13
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
14
15 Robert Stone, Derryck Dawson and Abraham Case No. BC604257
Aguayo on behalf of themselves and all others (Assigned to the Honorable David
16 similarly situated. Cunningham - Dept. 9)
17
Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum of Points
18 and Authorities in Support of Motion to
VS. Amend; Declaration of Derryck Dawson
19
U.S. Security Associates, Inc., a Delaware Date August 19, 2020
20 corporation, and Does | through 10 Time 10:00 a.m
Dept: 9
21
Defendant.
22
1 IT Is INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE COURT TO CONSIDER DEFENDANT’S SUBSTANTIVE ARGUMENTS
23 REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED AMENDMENT
24 Ordinarily, the judge will nor consider the validity of the proposed amended pleading in
25 deciding whether to grant leave to amend. For a motion to amend pleadings, grounds for demurrer or
26 motion to strike are premature. After leave to amend is granted, the opposing party will have the
27 opportunity to attack the validity of the amended pleading; 6:688. [See Kittredge Sports Co. v. Sup.Ct
28
Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum re Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint
I
10:20:04 2020-08-10
Document Filed Date
August 10, 2020
Case Filing Date
December 15, 2015
Category
Other Commercial Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Summary Judgment 02/16/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
To: Clerk Los Angtles Superior Court + Page 2 of 21 2020-08-10 17:04:40 (GMT) 18183382533 From: Peter Dion-Kindem . FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles PETER R. DION-KINDEM (SBN 95267) B THE DION-KINDEM LAW FIRM AUG 10 2020 PETER R. DION-KINDEM, P. C. Sherri RK. Curier, executive Officer/ 2945 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 Clerk Westlake Village, CA 91361 By. Deputy Rita Navarvan Telephone (818) 883-4900 Email: peter@dion-kindemlaw.com 5 LONNIE C, BLANCHARD, HI (SBN 93530) THE BLANCHARD LAW Group, APC 11 East Washington Boulevard, No. 2262 Commerce, California 90040 Telephone (213) 599-8255 Fax (213) 402-3949 Email lonnieblanchard@gmail.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Stone It 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 14 15 Robert Stone, Derryck Dawson and Abraham Case No. BC604257 Aguayo on behalf of themselves and all others (Assigned to the Honorable David 16 similarly situated. Cunningham - Dept. 9) 17 Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum of Points 18 and Authorities in Support of Motion to VS. Amend; Declaration of Derryck Dawson 19 U.S. Security Associates, Inc., a Delaware Date August 19, 2020 20 corporation, and Does | through 10 Time 10:00 a.m Dept: 9 21 Defendant. 22 1 IT Is INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE COURT TO CONSIDER DEFENDANT’S SUBSTANTIVE ARGUMENTS 23 REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED AMENDMENT 24 Ordinarily, the judge will nor consider the validity of the proposed amended pleading in 25 deciding whether to grant leave to amend. For a motion to amend pleadings, grounds for demurrer or 26 motion to strike are premature. After leave to amend is granted, the opposing party will have the 27 opportunity to attack the validity of the amended pleading; 6:688. [See Kittredge Sports Co. v. Sup.Ct 28 Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum re Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint I 10:20:04 2020-08-10