arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT STONE VS U S SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC Other Commercial Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ROBERT STONE VS U S SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC Other Commercial Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

DK PETER R. DION-KINDEM (SBN 95267) THE DION-KINDEM LAW FIRM PETER R. DION-KINDEM, P. C. 2945 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 FILED Sup erior Court of California Westlake Village, CA 91361 ounty of Los Angeles Telephone: (818) 883-4900 Email: peter@dion-kindemlaw.com JUL 30 2021 Sherri Exegptive Otficer/Clerk of Court LONNIE C. BLANCHARD, III (SBN 93530) By. Deputy THE BLANCHARD LAW Group, APC 5211 East Washington Boulevard, No. 2262 Commerce, California 90040 Telephone: (213) 599-8255 Fax: (213) 402-3949 Email: lonnicblanchard@gmail.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Robert Stone, 11 Derryck Dawson and Abraham Aguayo 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 14 15 Robert Stone, Derryck Dawson and Abraham Case No. BC604257 16 Aguayo on behalfof themselves and all others CLASS ACTION similarly situated, (Assigned to the Honorable Yvette M. 17 Palazuelos - Dept. 9) Plaintiffs, 18 Declaration of Brandon J. Hill in Support vs. of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s 19 Motion for Summary Adjudication and 20 U.S. Security Associates, Inc., a Delaware Summary Judgment corporation, and Does | through 10 21 Date: August 13, 2021 Defendant. Time: 10:00 a.m. 22 Dept.: 9 23 24 I, Brandon J. Hill, declare: 1am more than 18 years of age. I have personal knowledge of the following facts. 25 1am a licensed attorney in Florida, Illinois, and the District of Columbia. I am a partner at 26 Wenzel Fenton & Cabassa, P.A. | am admitted in this case pro hac vice for Plaintiffs. 27 I did not represent Mr. Stone in the consolidated action in Georgia. I represented Mr. Decaro. 28 Declaration of Brandon J. Hill in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication and Summary Judgment 1