On May 14, 2015 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bautista Nathankan Rueasrichan,
Junthanun Sunnee,
and
Plb Mangement Llc,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
e
SEDGWICK LLP
STEVEN D. DI SAIA (State Bar No.158119)
steven.disaia@sedgwicklaw.com
ORIGINAL .
NICHOLAS A. WEISS (State Bar No. 260606)
nicholas.weiss@sedgwicklaw.com FILED
801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Superior Court of California
ounty of Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556
Telephone: 213.426.6900 JUL 29 2016
Facsimile: 213.426.6921 |
Sh eri Carter, Exacutive Officer/Clerk
Attorneys for Defendant PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC idolRaul
By. Kena
Sanchez
Oeputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
9
10
SUNNEE JUNTHANUN and NATHANKAN ) CASE NO. BC 581954
iW RUEASRICHAN BAUTISTA,
) Assigned for All Purposes to:
12 Plaintiffs, ) Hon. Howard L. Halm, Dept. 53
Vv
13
) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California ) AUTHORITIES BY DEFENDANT PLB
14 limited liability company; and DOES 1 to 20, ) MANAGEMENT, LLC IN REPLY TO
inclusive,
1S ) OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
Defendants. PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM FROM
16 ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
17 )
) DATE: August 5, 2016
18 ) TIME: 8:30 a.m.
) DEPT: 53
19
) Reservation ID: 160607134062
20 )
21
22
23 I INTRODUCTION
24 Though the Court generously gave plaintiffs an opportunity to amend in granting this
or
25 defendant’s initial Motion to Strike Punitive Damages, to allow some factual showing of malice,
ce
26 oppression, or fraud, as required to sustain the onerous demand made, the Opposition confirms
mt
ae
27 that plaintiffs are simply unable to meet this burden. Quite shockingly, plaintiffs do not even
28 make an effort to do so. Rather, the Opposition is a word for word regurgitation of the flawed
83590128v1 -le
REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM FROM PLAINTIFFS' FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Document Filed Date
July 29, 2016
Case Filing Date
May 14, 2015
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 12/20/2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
e SEDGWICK LLP STEVEN D. DI SAIA (State Bar No.158119) steven.disaia@sedgwicklaw.com ORIGINAL . NICHOLAS A. WEISS (State Bar No. 260606) nicholas.weiss@sedgwicklaw.com FILED 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Superior Court of California ounty of Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556 Telephone: 213.426.6900 JUL 29 2016 Facsimile: 213.426.6921 | Sh eri Carter, Exacutive Officer/Clerk Attorneys for Defendant PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC idolRaul By. Kena Sanchez Oeputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 9 10 SUNNEE JUNTHANUN and NATHANKAN ) CASE NO. BC 581954 iW RUEASRICHAN BAUTISTA, ) Assigned for All Purposes to: 12 Plaintiffs, ) Hon. Howard L. Halm, Dept. 53 Vv 13 ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California ) AUTHORITIES BY DEFENDANT PLB 14 limited liability company; and DOES 1 to 20, ) MANAGEMENT, LLC IN REPLY TO inclusive, 1S ) OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE Defendants. PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM FROM 16 ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 ) ) DATE: August 5, 2016 18 ) TIME: 8:30 a.m. ) DEPT: 53 19 ) Reservation ID: 160607134062 20 ) 21 22 23 I INTRODUCTION 24 Though the Court generously gave plaintiffs an opportunity to amend in granting this or 25 defendant’s initial Motion to Strike Punitive Damages, to allow some factual showing of malice, ce 26 oppression, or fraud, as required to sustain the onerous demand made, the Opposition confirms mt ae 27 that plaintiffs are simply unable to meet this burden. Quite shockingly, plaintiffs do not even 28 make an effort to do so. Rather, the Opposition is a word for word regurgitation of the flawed 83590128v1 -le REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM FROM PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT