On May 14, 2015 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bautista Nathankan Rueasrichan,
Junthanun Sunnee,
and
Plb Mangement Llc,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Be
'
anyhea aps Af
wadUag GA wt
SEDGWICK LLP
STEVEN D. DI SAIA (State Bar No.158119) FILED
steven.disaia@sedgwicklaw.com Superior Court of California
NICHOLAS A. WEISS (State Bar No. 260606) County of Los Angeles
nicholas. weiss@sedgwicklaw.com
801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor JUL 29 2016
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556
Sh lerti Carter, Exgcutive Officer/Clerk
Telephone: 213.426.6900
Facsimile 213.426.6921 aadRaul
By, eee
Sanchez
Deputy
Attorneys for Defendant PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
9
10
SUNNEE JUNTHANUN and NATHANKAN ) CASE NO. BC 581954
11 RUEASRICHAN BAUTISTA.
Assigned for All Purposes to:
12 Plaintiffs, Hon. Howard L. Halm, Dept. 53
v
13
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
14
PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California ) AUTHORITIES BY DEFENDANT PLB
limited liability company; and DOES 1 to 20. ) MANAGEMENT, LLC IN REPLY TO
inclusive,
15 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
Defendants DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED
16 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
17
DATE:
August 5, 2016
18 ) TIME: 8:30 am
) DEPT: 53
19 ) RESERVATION ID: 160607134062
20 )
)
21 )
22 I INTRODUCTION
23 Though the Court generously gave plaintiffs an opportunity to amend, in granting this
24 defendant’s initial Demurrer, to allow the requisite showing to support their Intentional Infliction
ox
25 of Emotional Distress, Fraud, and Deceit Causes of Action, the Opposition confirms plaintiffs
ee
26 are once again unable to carry this burden. Instead, plaintiffs rely entirely on the same flawed
27 legal arguments that this Court has already deemed to be insufficient, in sustaining the initial
28 Demurrer.
83590158v1 -1-
REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
DAMAGES
Document Filed Date
July 29, 2016
Case Filing Date
May 14, 2015
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 12/20/2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Be ' anyhea aps Af wadUag GA wt SEDGWICK LLP STEVEN D. DI SAIA (State Bar No.158119) FILED steven.disaia@sedgwicklaw.com Superior Court of California NICHOLAS A. WEISS (State Bar No. 260606) County of Los Angeles nicholas. weiss@sedgwicklaw.com 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor JUL 29 2016 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556 Sh lerti Carter, Exgcutive Officer/Clerk Telephone: 213.426.6900 Facsimile 213.426.6921 aadRaul By, eee Sanchez Deputy Attorneys for Defendant PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 9 10 SUNNEE JUNTHANUN and NATHANKAN ) CASE NO. BC 581954 11 RUEASRICHAN BAUTISTA. Assigned for All Purposes to: 12 Plaintiffs, Hon. Howard L. Halm, Dept. 53 v 13 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 14 PLB MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California ) AUTHORITIES BY DEFENDANT PLB limited liability company; and DOES 1 to 20. ) MANAGEMENT, LLC IN REPLY TO inclusive, 15 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO Defendants DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED 16 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 17 DATE: August 5, 2016 18 ) TIME: 8:30 am ) DEPT: 53 19 ) RESERVATION ID: 160607134062 20 ) ) 21 ) 22 I INTRODUCTION 23 Though the Court generously gave plaintiffs an opportunity to amend, in granting this 24 defendant’s initial Demurrer, to allow the requisite showing to support their Intentional Infliction ox 25 of Emotional Distress, Fraud, and Deceit Causes of Action, the Opposition confirms plaintiffs ee 26 are once again unable to carry this burden. Instead, plaintiffs rely entirely on the same flawed 27 legal arguments that this Court has already deemed to be insufficient, in sustaining the initial 28 Demurrer. 83590158v1 -1- REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES