arrow left
arrow right
  • PALLMAR AND COMPANY VS GAFF GROUP INC BREACH OF CONTRACT (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PALLMAR AND COMPANY VS GAFF GROUP INC BREACH OF CONTRACT (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

\ 1 D. Scott Abernethy (CA Bar #151014) _ LAW OFFICES OF D. SCOTT ABERNETHY . 2 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 550 _ _ J - Newport Beach, California 92660 3 Telephone: (714) 572-3034 3IIurtoEg@§ ‘- Cluty om,,An"g‘g;'=h Fax: (714) 572-3054 » 6 4 Attorney for: Plaintiff PALLMAR AND COMPANY sh . JUL 2 Q 2016 5 3:“ K C : “‘"’° Ofcer/Clezk '65 6 - lsllemu Deputy La, 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 _ 8 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT _ 9 LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION By F 1 N 10 * 3 Q PALLMAR AND COMPANY, a California 16 K Q 0 11 . Case No.2 corporation 12 Plainti VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR: 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT 13 vs. 2. OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT 14 GAFF GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation; 3. ACCOUNT STATED NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS 4. FORECLOSURE OF MECHANICS LIEN 15 CORPORATION (formerly known as NORTHROP ' 16 GRUMMAN CORPORATION), a Delaware [Amount in controversy does not exceed corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, $25,000] 17 Defendants 13 19 20 Plaintiff PALLMAR AND COMPANY (hereinafter “PALLMAR”) alleges as follows: 21 1. Plaintiff PALLMAR was at all times relevant herein and is now a California corporation. 22 p p _ 2. PALLMAR is and at all times relevant herein was licensed by the State of California to perform 23 the labor described herein, which is the subject matter ofthis complaint. 24 3. PALLMAR is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges that defendant GAFF GROUP, 25 INC. (hereinaer “GAFF GROUP”) is and at all times relevant herein was a Florida corporation 2 6 authorized to conduct business in the State of California and the County of Los Angeles. 27 . ‘ ‘ ENTERED .41; 29 gg A AUG 012015 COMPLAINT ::t_i.