arrow left
arrow right
  • DANA SCOTT WILHELM ET AL VS YUK MING CHAN ET AL Quiet Title (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DANA SCOTT WILHELM ET AL VS YUK MING CHAN ET AL Quiet Title (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Be @ EUGENE S. ALKANA, ESQ., BAR NO. 60411 LAW OFFICES OF EUGENE S. ALKANA 131 N. EL MOLINO AVENUE SUITE 310 PASADENA, CA 91101 UDeriep IL BR TEL: (626) 796-8170 County oF Lg oF C, FAX: (626) 795-6138 litorn i E-mail: eugenealkana@mindspring.com SA Bele. She; Iti R. V4 2016 Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Complainant, YUK MING CHAN Mecutiy Udi Lap, Men Ch rh * Poputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 DANA SCOTT WILHELM AND DENICE CASE NO. BC 613976 LOUISE WILHELM, TRUSTEES OF THE 12 DANA AND DENICE WILHELM TRUST [Assigned for all purposes to the DATED 11-28-11, Hon. Barbara A. Meiers, Dept. 12] 13 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT AND CROSS- 14 COMPLAINANT YUK MING CHAN’S vs. (PROPOSED) CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR: 15 YUK MING CHAN, an individual; 1) NEGLIGENT INTERFERENCE WITH 16 AFFILIATED FUNDING CORPORATION, PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC a Nevada corporation, et al. and DOES 1 ADVANTAGE 17 through 100, inclusive, 2) NEGLIGENT INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT 18 Defendants. 3) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC 19 YUK MING CHAN, an individual, ADVANTAGE 4) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE 20 Cross-Complainant, ) WITH CONTRACT 5) TRESPASS 21 VS. ) Complaint Filed: March 17, 2016 22 DANA SCOTT WILHELM AND DENICE ) LOUISE WILHELM, INDIVIDUALLY AND) 23 AS TRUSTEES OF THE DANA AND ) DENICE WILHELM TRUST DATED 11- ) 24 28-11, and ROES 1 through 20, inclusive ) 25 Cross-Defendants. ) be 26 4 TO CROSS-DEFENDANTS AND THEIR af TORNEYS OF RECORD: 28 Defendant and Cross-Complainant YUK MING CHAN hereby complains against Cross- er 1 DEFENDANT AND CROSS-COMPLAINANT YUK MING CHAN’S CROSS-COMPLAINT