arrow left
arrow right
  • SHANNON GRIFFITH VS JESSICA WAGSTAFF Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SHANNON GRIFFITH VS JESSICA WAGSTAFF Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

ORIGINAL ROBERT J. ROMERO (SBN 136539) FILED BRADLEY M. ZAMCZYK (SBN 151753) Superb!'Court Of California CASEY A. HATTON (SBN 246081) County Of Lot Angeles HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LIT One California Street, 18th Floor FEB 1 5 2018 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6000 Sherri R. Carter, Ha cfive Gem/Clerk Facsimile: 415-834-9070 lit v, , BY-11°Ar ___________le ?tit eaten __________4 De l ) M Y Attorneys for Defendant JESSICA WAGSTAFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SHANNON GRIFFITH, Case No. BC 609667 Plaintiff, MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 vs. DEFENDANT JESSICA WAGSTAFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO JESSICA WAGSTAFF, DOES 1 TO 10, EXCLUDE ANY.AND ALL EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY AND ARGUMENT THAT Defendants. PLAINTIFF IS AN "EGGSHELL PLAINTIFF" Date: March 26, 2018 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 97 Complaint Filed: February 9, 2016 L -J Trial Date: March 26, 2018 TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 26,2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 97 of the above entitled court, Defendant Jessica Wagstaff ("Wagstaff') will move this court in limine for an r•.,) order excluding any and all evidence, testimony and argument that plaintiff Shannon Griffith ..„ ("Griffith" or "Plaintiff') is an "eggshell plaintiff," "thin skull plaintiff' or "eggshell skull plaintiff." This motion is being made pursuant to California Evidence Code sections 350 and 352 on the grounds that argument related to Plaintiff as an "eggshell skull plaintiff' is irrelevant, immaterial, confusing, and will create a substantial danger of undue prejudice to Defendant. As such, Defendant 1 DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE ANY AND ALL EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY ANg ARGUMENT THAT PLAINTIFF IS AN "EGGSHELL PLAINTIFF" — Case No. BC 6096671