arrow left
arrow right
  • SHANNON GRIFFITH VS JESSICA WAGSTAFF Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SHANNON GRIFFITH VS JESSICA WAGSTAFF Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically John C. Taylor, State Bar No. 78389 Robert R. Clayton, State Bar No. 202899 TAYLOR & ING, LLP FILED by Superior Court of California 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 360 County of Los Angeles on Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Tel.: Fax: (310) 209-4100 (310) 208-5052 03/7/18 ”ee Sheri R. Carter, ecutive Offic ert ler Majid Hashemi, State Bar No. 233623 Thach Tran, State Bar No. 310800 By Deputy HASHEMI LAW GROUP Christopher Aquino 1541 Ocean Avenue, Suite 200 Santa Monica, California 90401 Tel.: 310) 458-1076 Fax: (310) 458-1276 Attorneys for Plaintiff, SHANNON GRIFFITH 10 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 14 15 SHANNON GRIFFITH, CASE NO. BC609667 16 Plaintiff, [Complaint filed 02/09/2016; Assigned for all purposes to Dept. 97 17 vs, Opposition to Defendant’s MIL No. 10 18 JESSICA WAGSTAFF, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO 19 DEFENDANT JESSICA WAGSTAFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE 20 Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S USE OF IRRELEVANT AND PREJUDICIAL EVIDENCE OR 21 ARGUMENT AT TRIAL OR DURING VOIR DIRE EMPLOYING THE “REPTILE 22 THEORY” 23 Trial Date: March 26. 2018 24 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 25 Plaintiff, SHANNON GRIFFITH hereby submits her opposition to Defendant Jessica Wagstaff’s 26 Motion In Limine Number 10 to Preclude Plaintiffs Use of Irrelevant and Prejudicial Evidence or 27 Argument at Trial or During Voir Dire Employing the “Reptile Theory.” 28 Mt 1 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT WAGSTAFF’S MIL NO. 10