On February 09, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Garcia Arnold Josue,
Garcia Miguel,
Garcia Reina,
and
Eddies Trucking & Messenger Service Llc,
Edward Barsoun,
Gray Tommie Jerome,
Hrant Vartzbedian,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
OR. SINAL
FILED
Cou
of Cal
rifotmia
Hill Arrow Booth, Esq., SBN: 125936 of Los Angeles
hbooth@pboothllp.com
Tan P. Culver, Esq., SBN: 245106 © APR 23 2018
iculve:
BOOT:
r(
¢ boothllp.com
LLP
1849 Sawtelle Blvd., Suite 500
SheriR.
Los Angeles, CA 90!
Telephone: (310) 641-1800
Facsimile: (310) 641-1818
Attorneys for Defendants, EDWARD BARSOUN dba EDDIES TRUCKING AND
MESSENGER SERVICE, LLC and HRANT VARTZBEDIAN and TOMMI
JEROME GRAY E
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE
10
11 MIGUEL GARCIA; REINA GARCIA; and Case No.: BC618627
DAMARIS GARCIA, Individually and as the
12 Surviving Heirs, Personal Representatives, Assigned to Hon. Elaine Lu, Dept. 5
Successors in Interest of Decedent, ARNOLD
13 JOSUE GARCIA, and/or as Administrators or REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
Executors of the Estate of Amold Josue Garcia, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE
14 NUMBER 8 TO PRECLUDE “GOLDEN
Plaintiffs, RULE” AND “REPTILE” THEORIES
15 AT TRIAL
v.
16
TOMMIE JEROME GRAY, VARTZBEDIAN Date: April 27, 2018
17 HRANT; BARSOUN EDWARD DBA Time: 10:00 a.m.
EDDIES TRUCKING AND MESSENGER Place: Dept. 5.
18 SERVICE, LLC and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
19 Action Filed: April 28, 2016
Defendants. Trial Date: May 14
20
21
22
23
I INTRODUCTION
24
"25 Defendants submit this Reply in support of their Motion in Limine Number 8 to prevent
4m
26 Plaintiffs from utilizing the improper “Golden Rule” and “Reptile” theories at trial. Plaintiffs’
op
he,
27 opposition to this motion raises issues and makes arguments unrelated to the issues raised by this
28 Motion, which arguments will be disregarded.
1
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 3
Document Filed Date
April 23, 2018
Case Filing Date
February 09, 2016
Status
Jury Verdict 07/08/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OR. SINAL FILED Cou of Cal rifotmia Hill Arrow Booth, Esq., SBN: 125936 of Los Angeles hbooth@pboothllp.com Tan P. Culver, Esq., SBN: 245106 © APR 23 2018 iculve: BOOT: r( ¢ boothllp.com LLP 1849 Sawtelle Blvd., Suite 500 SheriR. Los Angeles, CA 90! Telephone: (310) 641-1800 Facsimile: (310) 641-1818 Attorneys for Defendants, EDWARD BARSOUN dba EDDIES TRUCKING AND MESSENGER SERVICE, LLC and HRANT VARTZBEDIAN and TOMMI JEROME GRAY E SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 10 11 MIGUEL GARCIA; REINA GARCIA; and Case No.: BC618627 DAMARIS GARCIA, Individually and as the 12 Surviving Heirs, Personal Representatives, Assigned to Hon. Elaine Lu, Dept. 5 Successors in Interest of Decedent, ARNOLD 13 JOSUE GARCIA, and/or as Administrators or REPLY IN SUPPORT OF Executors of the Estate of Amold Josue Garcia, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE 14 NUMBER 8 TO PRECLUDE “GOLDEN Plaintiffs, RULE” AND “REPTILE” THEORIES 15 AT TRIAL v. 16 TOMMIE JEROME GRAY, VARTZBEDIAN Date: April 27, 2018 17 HRANT; BARSOUN EDWARD DBA Time: 10:00 a.m. EDDIES TRUCKING AND MESSENGER Place: Dept. 5. 18 SERVICE, LLC and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 19 Action Filed: April 28, 2016 Defendants. Trial Date: May 14 20 21 22 23 I INTRODUCTION 24 "25 Defendants submit this Reply in support of their Motion in Limine Number 8 to prevent 4m 26 Plaintiffs from utilizing the improper “Golden Rule” and “Reptile” theories at trial. Plaintiffs’ op he, 27 opposition to this motion raises issues and makes arguments unrelated to the issues raised by this 28 Motion, which arguments will be disregarded. 1 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 3