On February 09, 2016 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Garcia Arnold Josue,
Garcia Miguel,
Garcia Reina,
and
Eddies Trucking & Messenger Service Llc,
Edward Barsoun,
Gray Tommie Jerome,
Hrant Vartzbedian,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
O! ..GINAL
FILED
Hill Arrow Booth, Esq., SBN: 125936 Superior Court of Callfornial
hbooth@boothllp.com. Connty af Ene Angeles
Tan P. Culver, FS. SBN: 245106
iculve
BOOT! ¢ LLP boothllp.com MAY 14 2018
<
1849 Sawtelle Blvd., Suite 500 Sherri R. Ca er, xecunve Officer/Clerk of Court
Los Angeles, By. sDepiity
Telephone: (310) 641-1800 Raul Sanchez
Facsimile: (310) 641-1818
Attorneys for Defendants, EDWARD BARSOUN dba EDDIES TRUCKING AND
MESSENGER SERVICE, LLC and HRANT VARTZBEDIAN and TOMMIE
JEROME GRAY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES -SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE
10
11 MIGUEL GARCIA; REINA GARCIA; and Case No.: BC618627
DAMARIS. GARCIA, Individually and as the
12 Surviving Heirs, Personal Representatives, Assigned to Dept. 5 Hon. Elaine Lu
Successors in Interest of Decedent, ARNOLD
13 JOSUE GARCIA, and/or as Administrators or
Executors of the Estate of Arnold Josue Garcia, DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL
14 OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS
Plaintiffs, MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 4 TO
15 EXCLUDE POLICE OFFICER EXPERT
Vv. OPINIONS
16
TOMMIE JEROME GRAY, VARTZBEDIAN
17 HRANT; BARSOUN EDWARD DBA
EDDIES TRUCKING AND MESSENGER Date: May 22, 2018
18 SERVICE, LLC and DOES 1 through 100, Time: 10:00 a.m.
inclusive; Place: Dept. 5
19
Defendants.
20 Action Filed: April 28, 2016
Trial Date: May 24, 2018
21
22
Plaintiffs served a “Supplemental Motion” in further support of their Motion in Limine
24
Ne
bow No. 4 on May 2 by mail. Defendants hereby submit this Supplemental Opposition to Plaintiffs
25
he motion in limine number 4, which seeks to exclude the testimony the police officers who have
been designed as experts by all parties.
27
28 ' Plaintiffs are seeking to preclude the expert testimony of witnesses that they themselves designated as
experts,
1
DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 4
TO EXCLUDE POLICE OFFICER EXPERT OPINIONS
Document Filed Date
May 14, 2018
Case Filing Date
February 09, 2016
Status
Jury Verdict 07/08/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
O! ..GINAL FILED Hill Arrow Booth, Esq., SBN: 125936 Superior Court of Callfornial hbooth@boothllp.com. Connty af Ene Angeles Tan P. Culver, FS. SBN: 245106 iculve BOOT! ¢ LLP boothllp.com MAY 14 2018 < 1849 Sawtelle Blvd., Suite 500 Sherri R. Ca er, xecunve Officer/Clerk of Court Los Angeles, By. sDepiity Telephone: (310) 641-1800 Raul Sanchez Facsimile: (310) 641-1818 Attorneys for Defendants, EDWARD BARSOUN dba EDDIES TRUCKING AND MESSENGER SERVICE, LLC and HRANT VARTZBEDIAN and TOMMIE JEROME GRAY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES -SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 10 11 MIGUEL GARCIA; REINA GARCIA; and Case No.: BC618627 DAMARIS. GARCIA, Individually and as the 12 Surviving Heirs, Personal Representatives, Assigned to Dept. 5 Hon. Elaine Lu Successors in Interest of Decedent, ARNOLD 13 JOSUE GARCIA, and/or as Administrators or Executors of the Estate of Arnold Josue Garcia, DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL 14 OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS Plaintiffs, MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 4 TO 15 EXCLUDE POLICE OFFICER EXPERT Vv. OPINIONS 16 TOMMIE JEROME GRAY, VARTZBEDIAN 17 HRANT; BARSOUN EDWARD DBA EDDIES TRUCKING AND MESSENGER Date: May 22, 2018 18 SERVICE, LLC and DOES 1 through 100, Time: 10:00 a.m. inclusive; Place: Dept. 5 19 Defendants. 20 Action Filed: April 28, 2016 Trial Date: May 24, 2018 21 22 Plaintiffs served a “Supplemental Motion” in further support of their Motion in Limine 24 Ne bow No. 4 on May 2 by mail. Defendants hereby submit this Supplemental Opposition to Plaintiffs 25 he motion in limine number 4, which seeks to exclude the testimony the police officers who have been designed as experts by all parties. 27 28 ' Plaintiffs are seeking to preclude the expert testimony of witnesses that they themselves designated as experts, 1 DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 4 TO EXCLUDE POLICE OFFICER EXPERT OPINIONS