On September 07, 2021 a
Request,Application
was filed
involving a dispute between
The Right Spinal Clinic, Inc.,
and
Geico General Ins. Co.,
for Personal Injury Protection ($8,001 - $15,000)
in the District Court of Miami-Dade County.
Preview
Filing # 147203950 E-Filed 04/06/2022 05:30:29 PM
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
THE RIGHT SPINAL CLINIC, INC.
A/A/O LOIDA HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff, Case No.: 2021-009772-CC-21
Division: HI01
v.
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
_______________________________________/
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
Defendant, GEICO General Insurance Company (“GEICO”), pursuant to Rule 1.370,
Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, responds to Plaintiff’s First Request for Admissions to Defendant
as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed its Complaint against GEICO, broadly seeking PIP benefits for
medical services allegedly provided by Plaintiff.
2. Plaintiff filed its First Request for Admissions to Defendant (the “Request for
Admissions”) on March 15, 2022.
3. On January 19, 2022, GEICO filed its Motion and Supporting Memorandum to
Stay Proceedings (“Motion to Stay”) and Motion for Protective Order and Supporting
Memorandum of Law (“Motion for Protective Order”). GEICO’s Motion to Stay and Motion for
Protective Order seek a stay of these proceedings including any and all discovery. GEICO’s
Motions are based upon the principle of priority, which requires that the latter court to assume
jurisdiction is precluded from prosecuting a lawsuit, requiring the action be stayed – including all
discovery – while the prior action remains pending.
4. Based on the pending Motion to Stay and Motion for Protective Order, GEICO
objects to each request in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, and reserves the right to file amended
responses should the Court deny GEICO’s Motion to Stay and Motion for Protective Order and
allow discovery to proceed in this matter.
5. GEICO further objects to any discovery related to inquiries claiming that the
services were lawfully rendered or were reasonable, related and/or medically necessary as this case
should be stayed and to the extent that the services were provided at all.
6. GEICO files this response out of an abundance of caution, and contends that
GEICO’s Motion to Stay and Motion for Protective Order should be heard before any discovery
is conducted in this action.
Dated: April 6, 2022.
Respectfully submitted,
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
/s/ E. K. Cottrell
Edward K. Cottrell (FBN 13579)
ecottrell@sgrlaw.com
Drew Krieger (FBN 117800)
dkrieger@sgrlaw.com
50 N. Laura Street, Suite 2600
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Telephone: (904) 598-6100
Facsimile: (904) 598-6300
Primary Service Email: PIPeservice@sgrlaw.com
And
LAW OFFICE OF HAYDEE DE LA ROSA-
TOLGYESI
2600 Douglas Road, Suite 700
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Telephone: (786) 483-1830
Facsimile: (305) 373-3661
Primary Service Email: miamipipgeico@geico.com
Attorneys for Defendant
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been filed through the
Florida Court’s E-filing Portal this 6th day of April, 2022, which will send a copy of the filed
document to:
Kelly M Arias, Esq.
THE EVOLUTION LAW GROUP, P.A.
2700 Glades Circle, Suite 145
Weston, Florida 33327
Telephone: (954) 840-6665
Facsimile: (954) 840-6997
E-Mail: serviceelg@theevolutionlawgroup.com; george@bgelegal.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
/s/ E. K. Cottrell
Attorney
3
Document Filed Date
April 06, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 07, 2021
Category
Personal Injury Protection ($8,001 - $15,000)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.