arrow left
arrow right
  • WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY VS RVRGON CORP ET AL Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY VS RVRGON CORP ET AL Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

pop ew ORIGINAL e Sy lor | ‘Ounty of Le of Califomja eS Timcthy Carl Aires, Esq. (138169) AIRES LAW FIRM SEP 29 2016 6 Hughes, Suite 205 Sherri R. C; Vo Irvine, California 92618 ive Otficey/Clork (9495 718-2020 By. Deputy (949) 718-2021 FAX Attorneys for Plaintiff, WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT (UNLIMITED) OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT, STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 10 11 WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Case No. BC 635474 12 Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF ) CONTRACT; BREACH OF CONTRACT 13 Vv. ) ($28,988.38 DEMANDED) 14 RVRGON CORP. and dba SO CAL FIRE PRCTECTION; RIGOBERTO GONZALEZ ) [C.C.P. §425.10] 15 aka RIGO GONZALEZ and dba SO CAL 16 FIRE PROTECTION; C.E.G. FIRE PROTECTION INC.; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, ) 32. Murphy, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff Wesco Insurance Company, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby alleges 21 against Defendants, and each of them, as follows: 22 AWN co ms ma 23 no240 ma PRELIMINARY ALLEGATIONS mamm no so 223 Tin ocoomaba 24 oa oD AEw mH Zire oo 25 1 Plaintiff Wesco Insurance Company is now, and at all times relévfit hereto eas, Q Ra mE ca a 26 corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and qualifiedtd336; a ho = no 2cn 97 business in the State of California. Qaa 28 Mt tr ba eewe om aus aoon a aaao0 COMPLAINT