Motion-Secondary: Cho -v- Thom et al Print

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                ~
                                                                         FILe       5

     WIECHERT, MUNK & GOLDSTEIN, PC                                  BEA   AY   i
                                                                           DINGY oyF ‘AOI
                                                                                     ISTAI
     David W. Wiechert, SBN 94607
     William J. Migler, SBN 318518                                   AUG
                                                                       1 8 yyy:
     27136 Paseo Espada, Suite B1123
     San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675                           Ac              dake
     Telephone: (949) 361-2822
     Email: dwiechert@aol.com                                                           Deputy
     Email: william@wmgattorneys.com

     Attorneys for Plaintiff Duk Ho Cho

                  SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                           FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

10
                                                Case No. CIVSB2111313
11
     DUK HO CHO,
12                                              Hon. Donald L. Alvarez
                Plaintiff,
13   vs.

14                                              Department S23
     CLAYTON     THOM, an individual; CNC
15   MOTORS, INC., a California
     Corporation, LOTUS OF UPLAND,              PLAINTIFF DUK HO CHO’S
16
     LLC, a California limited liability        OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
     company; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,         MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
17

18              Defendants.
                                                Hearing Date: September 1, 2021
19                                              Time: 9:00 A.M.
20
21

22

23         Plaintiff Duk Ho Cho (‘Plaintiff’) hereby submits the following opposition to
4 | Defendants Clayton Thom, CNC Motors, Inc. (“CNC”), and Lotus of Upland,

25   LLC’s (“Lotus” and collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Stay.

26
27

28

                                      1
           PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
—

                                 Respectfully submitted:


     Date: August 19, 2021       WIECHERT, MUNK & GOLDSTEIN, PC


                                 By: /s/William J. Migler
                                     David W. Wiechert
                                     William J. Migler
                                     Attorneys for Plaintiff
                                     Duk Ho Cho



10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18
19

20
21
22

23

24

25

26

27

28

                                     2
          PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY