arrow left
arrow right
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Paul R. Markley, Esq. , Bar No. 102784 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARKLEY F California 2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 106 Super ior Court of Ange les Torrance, CA 90505 Coun’ tv af Tns 310-325-4004 310-325-9301 (fax) MAR 23.2018 : Attorney for Plaintiff, Tanaz Zamani serk of Coury SherriR. , Deputy By. BY FAX SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 TANAZ ZAMANI, an individual, CASE NO. BC637727 Assigned to Hon. Holly J. Fujie 12 Plaintiff, Dept. 98 13 vs. MOTION IN LIMINE PRECLUDING DEFENDANTS FROM INTRODUCING 14 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH; GILBERT ANY WITNESSES, EVIDENCE OR COTA; ROSA COTA and DOES 1-20, CONTENTIONS NOT DISCLOSED IN 15 RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY Inclusive, 16 Defendants. NUMBER SEVEN 17 Complaint filed: 10/19/16 Trial Date: 4/19/18 18 19 TO ALL PARTIES, THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND TO THE COURT: 20 This matter is set for Trial on April 19, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. in the above-entitled Court. , Plaintiff will move on that date or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard to exclude through a Motion in Limine for Order Precluding Defendants from Introducing any Witnesses, Evidence or Contentions Not Disclosed in Responses to Discovery. 24 - 25 This motion will be based upon the attached Declaration of Paul R. Markley, 26 27 -1- MOTION IN LIMINE PRECLUDING DEFENDANTS FROM INTRODUCING 28 ANY WITNESSES, EVIDENCE OR CONTENTIONS NOT DISCLOSED IN RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY NUMBER SEVEN