arrow left
arrow right
  • TAL HASSID VS EYAL COHEN-BASHI ET AL Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • TAL HASSID VS EYAL COHEN-BASHI ET AL Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/16/2019 12:17 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk 1 Daniel Y. Zohar, SBN 177866 Todd M. Foreman SBN 229536 2 ZOHAR LAW FIRM, P.C. 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 1500 3 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Telephone: 213-689-1300 4 Facsimile: 213-689-1305 dzohar@zoharlawfirm.com 5 tforeman@zoharlawfirm.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff TAL HASSID 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 TAL HASSID, an individual, Case No. BC620530 12 Plaintiff, [Hon. Maureen Duffy Lewis, Dept. 38] 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ UNNOTICED AND 14 EYAL COHEN-BASHI, an individual; UNTIMELY “BENCH MOTION”1 TO ORDER MEITAL COHEN BASHI, an individual; HC DERIVATIVE CLAIMS TO BE TRIED BY THE 15 GARAGE DOORS CORP, a California COURT corporation; ETO GARAGE DOORS CORP, 16 a California corporation, sued herein as a 17 nominal defendant; and DOES 1 through 100, Hearing: September 23, 2019 inclusive, Time: 9:30 a.m. 18 Dept: 38 Defendants. 19 Complaint: May 16, 2016 20 Trial: September 23, 2019 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Plaintiff is unaware of any procedure known as a “bench motion.” Plaintiff conducted a Westlaw search for this phrase and could not find any reference to such a procedure in California law. 28 Plaintiff suspects this phrase was invented to disguise Defendants’ improper and untimely motion to bifurcate. -1- OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ UNNOTICED AND UNTIMELY “BENCH MOTION” TO ORDER DERIVATIVE CLAIMS TO BE TRIED BY THE COURT