On July 18, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Acg Industries Inc.,
Misle Howard,
and
Rollins Properties,
Rollins Stephen,
for Other Writ /Judicial Review (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
*
Robert G. Klein, Esq., State Bar No. 128550
LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT G. KLEIN
8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 510 FILED
oavine Coun of Cx
Beverly Hills, California 90211 ue
County of tac Onn,
Telephone: (323) 653-3900
Facsimile: (213) 947-1441 JUN 16 2017
Sherzi Crusoe Uilicer/Cierk
Attorneys for Plaintiff ACG Industries, Inc., Howard Misle Deputy
Raul Sanchez
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
10
11 ACG INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nevada CASE NO. BC627525 Related to Cross
corporation, HOWARD MISLE, an individual ) Complaint in TC028534
12
Oa
BE p<8 13
Plaintiff, ) Hon. Rita Miller/Dept. 16
a5Z%
a*ss
mobs 14
vs. ) Action Filed: July 18, 2016
O22
wase
aesz 1S
ROLLINS PROPERTIES, a California general ) OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S
Ozrag partnership, STEPHEN ROLLINS, an ) MOTION IN LIMINE 2-PRECLUDE
aor
go>4
O33 16
individual; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive. ) EVIDENCE OF DAMAGES
&eoe
gas
BB Defendants. Date: June 30, 2017
17 Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept.: 16
18 ACG ENTERPRISES, INC., a corporation;
HOWARD MISLE, an individual. Discovery Cutoff: June 12, 2017
19 Motion Cutoff: June 26, 2017
Cross Complainant Trial Date: July 11, 2017
20 VS.
21 JULIET DORAN ROLLINS, an individual and )
22
ROES | through 10. )
)
23
)
Cross Defendants. )
be 24
)
Plaintiffs ACG Industries, Inc. (“ACG”) and Howard Misle (“Misle”) oppose defendants?
25
motion in limine to preclude the plaintiffs from offering evidence of damages claiming that any such
Moat 26
damages would be speculative. Defendants filed this motion before he even took plaintiffs’ expert
27
witness, Stan Smith, PhD. A copy of Dr. Smith’s CV is attached as Exhibit 1.
28
1
Opposition To Defendant's Motion In Limine 2-Preclude Evidence Of Damages
Document Filed Date
June 16, 2017
Case Filing Date
July 18, 2016
Category
Other Writ /Judicial Review (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 04/24/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
* Robert G. Klein, Esq., State Bar No. 128550 LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT G. KLEIN 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 510 FILED oavine Coun of Cx Beverly Hills, California 90211 ue County of tac Onn, Telephone: (323) 653-3900 Facsimile: (213) 947-1441 JUN 16 2017 Sherzi Crusoe Uilicer/Cierk Attorneys for Plaintiff ACG Industries, Inc., Howard Misle Deputy Raul Sanchez SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 ACG INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nevada CASE NO. BC627525 Related to Cross corporation, HOWARD MISLE, an individual ) Complaint in TC028534 12 Oa BE p<8 13 Plaintiff, ) Hon. Rita Miller/Dept. 16 a5Z% a*ss mobs 14 vs. ) Action Filed: July 18, 2016 O22 wase aesz 1S ROLLINS PROPERTIES, a California general ) OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S Ozrag partnership, STEPHEN ROLLINS, an ) MOTION IN LIMINE 2-PRECLUDE aor go>4 O33 16 individual; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive. ) EVIDENCE OF DAMAGES &eoe gas BB Defendants. Date: June 30, 2017 17 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 16 18 ACG ENTERPRISES, INC., a corporation; HOWARD MISLE, an individual. Discovery Cutoff: June 12, 2017 19 Motion Cutoff: June 26, 2017 Cross Complainant Trial Date: July 11, 2017 20 VS. 21 JULIET DORAN ROLLINS, an individual and ) 22 ROES | through 10. ) ) 23 ) Cross Defendants. ) be 24 ) Plaintiffs ACG Industries, Inc. (“ACG”) and Howard Misle (“Misle”) oppose defendants? 25 motion in limine to preclude the plaintiffs from offering evidence of damages claiming that any such Moat 26 damages would be speculative. Defendants filed this motion before he even took plaintiffs’ expert 27 witness, Stan Smith, PhD. A copy of Dr. Smith’s CV is attached as Exhibit 1. 28 1 Opposition To Defendant's Motion In Limine 2-Preclude Evidence Of Damages