arrow left
arrow right
  • DEBORAH MORALES VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DEBORAH MORALES VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ @ FENTATIVE RULING Hp) HEARING DATE: September 26, 2017 TRIAL: August 21, 2018 CASE: D eborah Morales v. Ford Motor Compan FILED Superior Court of California CASE NO.: BC656343 County of Los Angeles Opposed: Yes. SEP 262017 Sherr R_ Carter Ex, we Officer/Clerk Deputy MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION Anthon: MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Deborah Morales RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendant Ford Motor Company PROOF OF SERVICE: e Correct Address: Yes. e 16/21 (CCP § 1005(b)): OK. Served by overnight mail on August 11, 2017. sen” GRANT motion to compel deposition of Defendant’s PMK, however no order compelling production of documents will issue; ANALYSIS Motion to Compel Deposition of Person Most Knowledgeable Defendant has objected to the deposition notice on the ground that the PMK and counsel are not available and have not provided any available dates for this PMK deposition to take place. Barry Decl. 2-6. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling Defendant’s PMK deposition. The motion to compel the deposition of Defendant’s person most knowledgeable is GRANTED. However, Plaintiff.did not make a fact-specific showing of good cause justifying the production of documents sought to be produced in the notice of deposition. As such,-no order compelling production of documents will issue. 30 Defendant’s deposition is to take place within Maays of this order. ee a Be et ho ae Fe ~